Paper-clip marketing.

paperclip marketing

When you have nothing else  to offer, price is what people use to make a judgement about which alternative to buy.

Yours or someone else’s alternative?

However, most people also recognise that you get what you pay for, and that what you pay for is not always just more widgets in the box. Sometimes the widgets last longer, fit better, are not the same as everyone else has, are the first seen, the box just looks better,  and sometimes it is a bit of all of these, and many more factors that may influence the purchase.

Every person will have a different definition of what constitutes value in any given set of circumstances. Purchase of a box of paper clips has a different set of circumstances driving it than the purchase of a new car, but the process is the same.

Last week I watched a lady in one of those supermarket type office supplies places make a choice of a box of coloured paper clips over  the standard ones, paying a substantially higher price for her choice. Same number of clips, same size and shape box, just a more colourful design on the box, and of course, the coloured clips.

Well you say, it may be just a couple of dollars,  so it does not matter much, which is true, but when I chatted to her at the checkout and asked why she chose the coloured clips,  she did not say they were only a dollar or two more, she said she “just liked them better”

Surely our job as marketers is to find those little things that lead our customers to say those magic words  “I just like it better”, and give them what they like.

Price is so often used as an excuse for a lack of imagination that it makes me cry.

 

Three simple rules of blogging

blogging

Hunt around in Google, and there are thousands of posts out there giving you lists of things to do to have a successful blog. A few Are pretty good,  but most a just lists of the blindingly obvious, hoping that the headline “Top 20 tips for success” and their ilk attract attention.

My contribution to the  pile is a really simple list of three:

  1. Know who you are talking to well enough to, well, talk to them. It is after all just a conversation.
  2. Be original, relevant, interesting, and engaging, by reading widely, building on the ideas, looking for angles and unexpected applications, and offering connections to your readers.
  3. Do not forget rules 1 and 2.

Pretty simple, but like most seemingly simple things, there is much to distract from the simplicity that needs to be distilled out, hard choices need to be made, and focus found.

Never easy, but rewarding.

 

 

Managements single greatest failure

time waste

Many years ago, pre-digital,  I gave time to a sales rep who rang up and promised to bring in some samples of brand new products from Europe that had changed the dynamics of the market segments they were in. I presumed that all contained the stuff he sold, but the pitch was persuasive.

The upshot was that he brought in some examples that were at  best mundane,  that I had seen before,  were not innovative in any way, and that I was not interested in hearing about. Then I had to be rude to get rid of him and his lying pitch,  but was further subjected to a stream calls, letters, offers, and promises from him and his superiors that “spoke ” to me as if I was a red hot prospect,  desperate to throw myself at their shitty product.

He wasted my time, misled me, and then continued to irritate by trying to waste more of my time and presumed a relationship that did not exist, and that I would not have, and I have never forgotten the lesson.

Don’t waste peoples time!

The older I get, the more intolerant I seem to get when someone consumes that most valuable of all our resources, time, and I was pretty “bolshie”  25 years ago when this happened.

Whilst today everything moves so much faster than before, our time is if anything more valuable, but the presumption of those who want our attention seems to be that we all have plenty to share and usually waste.

One of the most effective sales people I have ever seen made appointments for 10 minutes each. He promised not to take more than the 10, and to deliver something of value while he was there, and he always did. No coffee, no chat about last nights football, straight to the point in 10 minutes or less, and any more time spent was entirely at the discretion of the appointee, he was always ready to leave, having delivered his pitch.

He valued peoples time and attention, so he got more of it.

Are you asking your people to waste not just their time, but that of those with whom they are paid to interact?

Have we lost it?

community gardens

Until I was about 10 years old, I lived in a little cottage at North Avalon, and used to walk to primary school through the sandhills, along the beach, then to  school, and back. It sometimes took longer than it should have, as there was simply so much to see and do.

Those with children who have been to a farm nursery will understand the joy, the wonder of it to those kids, yet, this is not a normal part of our landscape, as it was just a very few years ago. This connection to the world around us has been replaced by apartment blocks, video games, and concern about the safety, both physical and emotional, of our kids.

Somewhere along the line we have lost something, real engagement with the natural world has been lost, replaced by coverage by David Attenborough.

Imagine the urban  landscape that included again, those opportunities for the production of a bit of food for the family, and neighbours, how much reconnection might occur?.

Man is a social animal, and at some level we all understand that the most powerful motivator is recognition, not money, so social collaboration when enabled and recognised can change the world.

Look at what had happened with the town of Todmorden in Yorkshire, England, the productive gardens in our own backyard, have the potential to again be social glue, a force for the benefit of us all.

Problem is, the short term, financially driven mind set that dictates the usage if land around out cities, as well as in them mitigates against this opportunity to once again create the enablers of the production of social glue, and our children and grandchildren will be the worse for it.

 

 

Where is the ‘Why”

Simon Sinek

Simon Sinek

For 35 years as a corporate  manager and consultant I have been an advocate of, amongst other things, personal accountability, marketing ROI, extensive use of data in decision-making but without eliminating the wisdom of individuals who have “been there, done that”,  socialising businesses with various digital platforms, turning your supply chains around so they become demand chains, and much more.

Many of the 1,100 odd StrategyAudit posts to date have as the core idea the notion of “doing” something rather than just accepting the status quo.

It is only in the last few years that I have come to realise that while the advocacy was based on good solid reasoning coming from domain experience, technical expertise, and common sense, it is not enough by itself.

I have spent lots of time articulating various cases for change considering the “WIFM” (What’s in it for me) question explaining why the proposal was in not only the best interests of the individual, but of the organisation, but fell short of connecting into the reasons the organisation exists, why it deserves the commitment of the individual. Lots about commercial survival, innovation being the only sustainable competitive advantage, the commercial and personal value of simplicity and transparency, but little, as I said, about the big “Why” question.

Now, in a homogenised, connected, and integrating  world, little is more important than articulating the ‘Why” . Spend the time to watch Simon Sinek’s seminal presentation, your competitors almost  certainly have.