Yesterday’s fish wrapper?

Yesterday’s fish wrapper?

 

 

Blog posts live on, as does anything posted to the net.

Sometimes they come back to bite us, sometimes they merge from a long hibernation to live again.

Last thing you want is for that Facebook photo from that wild party at university to emerge a decade later when interviewing for that ‘ideal job’.

On the other hand, a simple idea in hibernation for a decade can suddenly wake up and add new value. For someone, its time has come!

It happened yesterday.

A simple blog post from 14 years ago that has hibernated without being disturbed for most of those 14 years woke up yesterday, and went ‘ballistic’.

(Ballistic is a relative term, but in the context of the billions of posts out there, and the usual readership numbers of StrategyAudit, it was ballistic)

Whoever you are that stumbled across this old post, and obviously shared it to your networks, thanks, and I hope you are able to leverage the idea to your great benefit.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Is Taylor Swift the greatest marketer of the last 20 years?

Is Taylor Swift the greatest marketer of the last 20 years?

 

 

There are many contenders from around the globe for the mantle of ‘GOAT”, or at least of the last 20 years.

The obvious choice might be Steve Jobs, whose single-minded pursuit of all the factors that coalesce into great, long lasting, and commercially effective marketing culture is unparalleled.

You might nominate Elon Musk. He reshaped the auto industry worldwide, made batteries sexy, and figured out how to create a reuseable rocket, before imploding by renaming Twitter ‘X’.

How about Jeff Bezos who figured we would buy books online and turned that idea into a retail behemoth that has reshaped markets.

Some might add the foul mothed Gary Vaynerchuck to the list, whose ability to promote himself while talking about himself is unmatched.

Then there is a small number of genuinely original marketing thinkers and academics: Seth Godin, Mark Ritson, Byron Sharp, Roger Martin, and Scott Galloway.

Add in a few hands-on practitioners like Angela Ahrendts, Richard Branson, Marc Pritchard, and a trio of Aussies who changed the world, Melanie Perkins, and the Atlassian duo of Farquhar and Cannon-Brookes (whose core values include ‘don’t F%@k the customer’) and you have a good list.

However, my nomination would be from outside the usual ‘who is the GOAT’ box. It is a 34-year-old musician, songwriter, entrepreneur, and publicity machine, who has added tens of billions to the GNP of the US.

Taylor Swift.

I could not identify one Taylor Swift song, and I do not know if she even has any musical talent, but she certainly is a truly great marketer!!

To have the world talking about you, (even a 72-year-old bloke in a blog post) to have massive fan clubs of ‘Swifties’ salivating over every new piece of iconography, hordes fighting to pay eyewatering amounts to get nosebleed seats in a 100,000 seat stadium, takes some talent.

What makes her so great? Indeed, what are the common characteristics of all those in the list?

  • Understands who her customers are, and applies relentless focus. Swifts core market is young women and girls. She has demonstrated mastery in engaging with that audience with the music, visual extravaganza, and personal storytelling that resonates. She is also a powerful role model, encouraging independence, ambition, creativity and determination, emotions to which those in her market all aspire.
  • Consistently creates value for customers, individually. It seems the ‘Swifties’ out there all see Taylor as someone they easily relate to personally, across a wide range of channels and media. She is consistently delivering experiences, based on the music and extravaganza shows, but supported by all sorts of adjacent activities, such as having Kobe Bryant, a superstar in his field, come on stage at a concert and wax lyrical about her kindness, generosity, and ‘grounded’ personal values. She tells Swifties what they want to hear, and even their parents have trouble arguing!
  • Is ‘the only one’. Marketing success is an outcome of meticulous attention to detail, and the communication of all those details in a package. It requires two types of activity that is an extremely difficult mix to get right. On one hand, you need to ensure ‘activation’. The calls to action that today generate the motivation to spend money to be a part of the party. On the other, it requires that long term investment be made that build a brand, an identity that engages and creates a long-term platform from which the activation and short-term revenue generators are launched. When done well, as in this case, there will be ‘only one’. Where else can a teenage girl find the excitement, engagement, communal vibe she gets from being part of a ‘Swiftie’ fan community?
  • Swift applies compounding leverage. Taylor has executed a masterful commercial strategy. Unlike almost all other entertainers, she has retained control of everything, and runs the whole shebang as the CEO of a large, volatile and very complex business entity. Her uncanny ability to generate ‘Buzz’ around everything she does, which is spread by wildfire word of mouth and unpaid media enables a continuous stream of ‘Swift-news’ which has fans hanging out for more. She provides the creativity, leadership, and alignment most CEO’s can only dream of across the diverse range of activity her business embraces.

Swift is touring Australia, starting later this month, with multiple sold out shows in Sydney and Melbourne. The hype is becoming all consuming: you even have to reserve a spot in the line to pick up your merch and get to the cash register at the exit of the ‘pop-up’ merchandise stores.

Header illustration is via DALL-E, everything else is ‘organic’

 

4 crucial questions to unlock the power of your advertising.

4 crucial questions to unlock the power of your advertising.

 

 

Last week I provided a template for a Customer Value Proposition. The template works well, but ‘Customer Value Proposition’ is a piece of marketing jargon which just means making a promise to your customers.

This presupposes that you actually know who your ideal customers are, and what sort of promise would be attractive to them.

In the January February 2024 Harvard Business Review there is an article called ‘The right way to build your brand‘ written by Roger Martin and two Co-authors. The article sets out research that proves the hypothesis that making a specific promise to customers is more attractive than a generic claim of some level of excellence. The specific promise is about the benefit a customer will receive with use of the product. A generic claim to greatness is just about the product.

It does not surprise that the first is more powerful than the second.

‘Your promise is your strategy’ is a sub headline towards the end of the article. When you think about it, the observation must be right. Strategy is a process of influencing factors over which you have no control in such a way that the subsequent behaviour of the customers benefits your enterprise rather than an alternative. Making a promise of performance in delivering an outcome desired by a customer is about the strongest driver of short-term behaviour I can think of.

Delivering on the promise, will build trust.

Right at the end the authors ask four crucial but simple questions that can be used to determine if a proposed advertising campaign is worth investing in:

  • Is the campaign based on a clear unambiguous customer promise?
  • Were customer insights used to identify a promise the customers value?
  • Is the promise framed in a way that is truly memorable?
  • Were product marketing, sales, operations, and customer service involved to ensure the promise will be consistently fulfilled?

To me, this sounds like a comprehensive framework by which to decide if a proposed communication campaign is a worthwhile investment.

 

 

 

 

A simple template for a killer Value Proposition

A simple template for a killer Value Proposition

 

Almost everyone has trouble with this most basic of marketing jobs, articulating your ‘Value Proposition’. It is a simple statement of the benefit a customer gets from using your product, rather than an alternative.

Internally it also plays a role, in aligning staff and other stakeholders to a common purpose.

For …………….. (your ideal customer)

Who……………..(define the specific need, pain point)

Name……………(of the service or product)

Provides…..…. (The key benefit)

For example, the simplified Value Proposition for StrategyAudit might be:

For small to medium manufacturing business leaders,

Who do not have the resources to hire deeply experienced management,

Allen Roberts from StrategyAudit,

Provides that deep experience across all functional areas of your business on an ad hoc, part time, project, or on-call basis that is guaranteed to lift your profitability.

This simple template works well for just about any product or service.

It forces you to articulate why your ideal customer should deal with you rather than an alternative, and the value they will derive from that choice.

Generating the best possible value proposition is an iterative process. Rarely do I see the ‘perfect’ one emerge quickly. Often there are several that look OK, which can be tested and improved.

 

 

A better way to segment your customer base.

A better way to segment your customer base.

 

Every customer segmentation exercise I have ever seen is based on geography, demographics, some combination of behavioural characteristics, or all of the foregoing.

‘Young women, 25-35, single, who live in the Eastern suburbs, earn more than 80k, and eat out a lot’ sort of analysis.

Misses the point.

There are five types of customers in every business I have ever seen

Unhappy. These will often tell you and anyone else they can grab, of their unhappiness.  Usually these are users, rather than the ones who make the purchase choice. This means they can be a fantastic source of improvement ideas, but can also consume lot of your time with things that cannot be changed.

Satisfied. When a customer is satisfied, they go away happy and you rarely hear from them. The more time you spend understanding the drivers of their satisfaction, and doubling down on them, the better.

 Loyal. This group of people usually quite small will not go anywhere else and will generally pay premium to you in the knowledge that you will not fail them. In effect, it is in effect a risk mitigation strategy for them.

Apostles.  Apostle customers these are generally small subsection of your loyal customers and occasionally just a satisfied customer when conditions are right who are prepared to aggressively push your case to others in their various networks. These people are your best salesman and also your cheapest, although there is a cost get him to getting them to the point where they will proselytise on your behalf

Cheapskates. The fifth type, the one you can probably do without, is the one who dips in and out of your product, chasing the cheapest price irrespective of other considerations. It  also seems to me from experience, that they are also the ones who complain a lot.

Think about it.

I am prepared to bet there will be nuggets of value hiding in plain sight you can use.

Header credit: My thanks to the exiled Scott Adams, and sidekick, Dilbert.

 

2023 top 10 StrategyAudit posts.

2023 top 10 StrategyAudit posts.

 

This is an indulgence, but who cares, it is that time of the year.

I do not spend too much time worrying about numbers, this blog is my personal ‘journal’ of the stuff I am thinking about. If others get some benefit from that great, if not, nobody cares.

However, contrary to the above, there are some lessons for me in the numbers, and learning from the past, and improving is what it is all about.

The obvious skew in numbers that arises from posts early in the year having more time to gather readers than those posted later, has been ignored. Most posts see the vast majority of views in the first week or so, so timing should not be a huge influencer. However, there are a few exceptions to that rule.

Number 8 on the list is a post on the business model of supermarkets written in 2014. This has been in the top 10, usually the top 3 every year since. Number 7 is a thought starter on the budgeting process, that annually added job everyone except accountants hate, which was posted in January 2020. Every other post on the list is from 2023.

There are a few common characteristics of the top posts.

  • Most promise a silver bullet of some sort in the headline. This may attract readers, but sadly, does not make the meat of the post any better. I can only hope that having been attracted, some might take some value out of the post.
  • They are generally shorter than the average. This may reflect the focus and promise of the headline, or alternatively, I just did a better editing job.
  • This characteristic is both a surprise and a worry to me. Apart from the two posts from previous years, and number 10 on the list, all have as a header a ‘Dilbert’ cartoon. Perhaps the presence of Dilbert is a strong motivator to readership? There was no intent here, and that correlation (or is it causation?) came as a complete surprise to me.
  • Almost half the readers come from the subscription list, which is not big, about 35% from LinkedIn, and the balance from search engines, mostly from Google, but a surprising number from random engines. Readers come 70% from Australia, next biggest is the US, followed by (presumably) taxi drivers in Mumbai looking to emigrate, and a few from places I have to consult an Atlas (remember those) to find.
  • Linkedin attracts a varying number on the platform, from a few to in some cases many thousands. The ‘views’ which misleadingly just counts the number of feeds a post has been shown in, bearing no relationship to being read, varies between a few, and many thousands. I only take account of the number of comments and reposts as an indicator of value, with a lesser value on ‘likes’. Linkedin discourages links leading off the platform by sticking offenders in ‘Linkedin gaol’, meaning they squeeze the algorithm so fewer  people on the platform have the chance to see it. Suffice to say, I expect my gaol sentence to be ‘life’.
  • As I run my eye down the full list, there is an increasing number of posts from previous years, some delivering very regular cadence of readership, years after publication. This is gratifying, and indicates that unlike a newspaper, a useful blog post is not just tomorrow’s fish wrapper. One that does continue to amuse is ‘Public Sector Flatulence’ published in 2013. It can go months without any readers, then suddenly, and suspiciously coincidental to some politicians brain-fart, it generates a bunch of views, and the odd comment.

 

For those interested, the list from top to number 10 is:

The simple choice marketers must make.

Plans never reflect what happens, so why bother?

The single key to great success.

Enduring culture change demands action.

The easiest and most effective way to build carbon emission compliance.

How to maximise the return from your investment in sales personnel.

5 Key factors to consider when planning your budgeting process.

3 essential pieces of the supermarket business model.

Equity or loans: The entrepreneurs funding dilemma.

The two key building blocks of strategy.

Thanks to all my readers, have a safe and merry Christmas, or whatever it is you celebrate (a valued friend is a Hindu, and Hindu’s traditionally marry on the last Sunday of the month. Guess  what he and his wife of 30 years are celebrating)

Note: Given the number of links in the post, Linkedin will send me to their gaol for life, ensuring as few as possible casual lookers get to see the posts. So, please encourage those who might be interested to subscribe on the StrategyAudit site. That way they can continue to have the chance of seeing the outcomes of my addled musings.

Header courtesy of Dilbert, and Scott Adams, again.  It just seemed right.