The golden rule of marketing in regulated markets.

The golden rule of marketing in regulated markets.

‘He who has the gold makes the rules’

I had to go to Sydney airport last week, and needed to park for a while, the plane was late.
It almost required an extension of the limit on my credit card.

It was just another brush with the cost of doing business with someone who has the inside running in a regulated market that I have had the misfortune to tangle with over the last few months. In this case, the airport is a monopoly, that was privatised. Governments seem to think that when they sell off a public asset to the private sector, the buyer will continue to price it at ‘social’ levels. They then act all surprised when the new owner with the regulated monopoly suddenly starts pricing at monopoly levels.

Consider what has happened to your power bills since the ‘privatisation’ process kicked in. Pretty obvious that the sale process included some sort of ring-fencing of competition to beef up the price so the press release looked better, as in the case of the sale of Port Botany and Port Kembla now being brought to court by the ACCC.

Pretty much all markets are regulated to some degree, from a very little to a whole lot, on top of the basics of incorporation, and paying taxes (which seems to be increasingly optional for MNC’s). Adding to the complication, there are three levels of government in this country all regulating different things in different ways creating an alphabet soup of bodies that have to be navigated before you can trade.

In highly regulated markets, it is reasonable to assume that most if not all incumbents will move aggressively and creatively to protect what they have. Claims of public interest, safety, loss of employment, are common, and are generally the reason the monopolies are there in the first place. However, what they have is a position that enables them to charge rent, rather than achieve success through a superior value proposition.

Understanding the structure of the rent seekers business model will help to see ways to invigorate or disrupt it.
The taxi industry is a classic. Around the world it was a regulated market that delivered regulated profits to the few who owned the licences, which therefore accrued a capital value, until Uber came along. Similarly, the milk industry in NSW was regulated until it became unmanageable to continue, and then there was a decade long 10 cents/litre levy to pay down the capital value of the regulated milk runs.

Having an understanding of who has the power in any market, the basis of that power, and the means by which it can be wielded, is vital to the construction of a viable business model and value proposition.

Header Photo credit: courtesy Jason Heller.

Focus delivers productivity

Focus delivers productivity

When you fail to focus, you are scattering your capital.

Most importantly,  you scatter the vital Intellectual Capital it takes to succeed, as well as the financial capital that is a vital enabler of success.

Limited resources need to be focused on the point where they will do the most good, generate the most leverage.

The familiar investment advice to spread your investments, ‘do not put all your eggs in one basket’ holds when you are a passive financial investor.

However, when you are an active investor, not just of your financial resources, but of your limited time and energy, it is better to follow Andrew Carnegie’s advice to ‘Put all your eggs in the one basket, then do not take your eyes off the basket’

This advice holds equally as you consider your long term plans, what outcome do you truly want, to planning your day today. Ask yourself ‘What is the one thing I really need to get done today that will take me one step closer to the goal’

As Confucius is reported to have said somewhere around 500 BC, ‘Every journey starts with a single step’. That advice is as valid in today’s world as it was then, so make sure you take that step every day, and that it is one step closer to the goal.

 

 

Anatomy of a sales effective website

Anatomy of a sales effective website

People search Google for 1 of 2 reasons:

  • They have a problem to solve, they need information, guidance, options, and are looking for help in some form.
  • They are bored and too lazy to go and have a game of golf, tennis, or mow the lawns, so they look for cat photos to amuse themselves.

It follows therefore that if you are setting out to be of interest to those in the first group, it helps if they recognise quickly that you have something of what they are seeking. Any Google search will throw up multiple options for the searcher to have a quick look at.

Most times when an SME recognises the need for a website, they hire a web designer, and stand back and let them run.

Wrong strategy.

The technology of websites these days is largely commoditised, the 18 year old down the road can often do the ‘techie’ end of a site construction quicker and better than many of the ‘professionals’ around.

The challenge is the  marketing and graphic design of the site.  This is all about the combination of the words being not only the right words for the visitor, but in the right place so they get seen, and the graphic design that makes the site visually interesting and engaging, and importantly, makes some  sort of offer that leads towards the transaction.

The following has nothing to do with SEO, it assumes that you have been found, by one means or another, and your task is now to engage the casual visitor, and very particularly, that casual visitor who fits the profile of your ideal customer, in some sort of process that may lead to  a (first) transaction. The reality is that if you are not attracting your ideal customer, the whole exercise will be at best, sub-optimal. The objective should be to get these people to step through the site to a positive conclusion.

The natural progression of eyes across a website is outlined below, as they seek the answer to the question in their minds ‘Will I find what I am looking for here?’

 

The basic principal.

Top left, to right, across towards middle left, then back to bottom right.

All of this is ‘above the fold’. Many of the more recent sites have a ‘rolling’ architecture, but that does not  eliminate the old adage of ‘be above the fold’.

Let’s go into a little more detail.

The header.

The all important header, or headline, has to be specific, and deliver the value proposition that is directed towards the ideal customer, the answer to their question. Evolutionary biology plays a key role in the construction of the header. Our built in survival mechanisms register automatically the elements around us, is it dangerous, is it food, shelter, a potential partner, without us recognising at a conscious level these automatic choices. If your ideal customer registers in their ‘lizard’ brain that you are good for them, a significant part of your work is done.

The cost of failure.

Highlighting the pain points most likely to be felt by your ideal customer provides a barrier to them just moving on. The more you can highlight the problem they feel, the greater the chance that they will ‘stick’ on your site instead of moving on.

The Solution.

In the simplest words possible, how does your product/service solve the problem.

The plan.

Having established the ideal outcome, offer a plan, create the steps to achieve it. Making it easy to progress to the transaction and beyond by making the process transparent and easy is the equivalent of a ‘Close’.

Testimonials.

‘Social proof’ to use the psychological jargon is an extremely powerful tool. People, prepared to be identified and tell a listener how great  your product or service is, how it delivered for them, are better than almost anything else in closing a sale. Even if the video is a bit amateurish, that is OK.  get those testimonials.

Call to Action.

Make sure that you ask for the order, or the progression through the funnel to the next stage. Often asking several times lifts the closure rates significantly.

 

There is  no need for clever graphics or fancy advertising slogans. Your ideal customer is looking to see if you can help them, or if they should speak to one of your competitors. The task of your website is therefore clear, by presenting a credible way of solving their problem.

No fancy embellishments, industry jargon to establish your creds, unintelligible sentences, words of 5 syllables, just simple, clear, uncluttered communication.

Help them to help themselves!

Header: is a common  ‘wire-frame’ 

 

Your three most valuable assets are not on your balance sheet.

Your three most valuable assets are not on your balance sheet.

 

The first is the value of your brands, the second is your customer list, the third is the ‘culture’ that exists, a fragile qualitative asset which is a vital part of commercial sustainability.

A balance sheet is a snapshot in time of the financial value of your business. It is based on standard accounting practice which fails to recognise the non financial assets that may be present.  Some may include an element of ‘goodwill’ but that is usually just an accounting treatment of the difference paid for a business compared to its tangible asset backing.

The value of a business is the future cash flow that will come from providing goods and services to customers. While that cash flow does come from the tangible assets of the business, in these days of ‘knowledge work’ most of it comes from the three sources noted above, not included on the balance sheet.

A professional services firm has very few tangible assets. A few desks and computers, they probably lease their premises, and their most valuable assets walk out of the office every afternoon.

In the case of a B2C business, your customers are generally different from your consumers, which just serves to increase the relative value of your brand. Consumers make the vital choice of which product to purchase, the intermediaries, wholesalers and retailers are just anticipating what choices they might make, and profiting from the arbitrage.

An acquaintance sold his business some months ago for a tidy sum. The business had been established for a considerable time, was successful, and he had kept up  the level of investment, particularly in his employees, so that it had every prospect of continuing to be successful.

The new owner closed it down.

They took on a few key employees, but locked the gates, broke the operating leases, and sold off the remaining assets.

All they wanted were the customer lists, along with what was in the heads of those few employees who had the direct relationships with the key customers, and the potential scale that was on offer with the elimination of a competitor.  The whole value of the business was tied up in the Intellectual Capital of those in the business, and the manner in which it delivered value to customers, not in the hard assets recorded in the balance sheet. However, in failing to recognise the value of the culture in the business which they destroyed, they ensured that the transaction would be a financial failure over the medium term.

Be sure you understand the full value of those assets not on your balance sheet, and invest in them, as ultimately, they will be the core of the value of the business.

 

The ‘Collaboration trap’

The ‘Collaboration trap’

 

Collaboration has become a standard mantra, ‘do it or die’.

I see all sorts of collaboration being put in place, most of it leads to wasted time, energy, lost opportunity, and suboptimal outcomes.

Why

The collaboration teams are thrown together from a pool in an enterprise where everyone thinks in a similar manner. There is little diversity of thought, and often those co-opted are the ones who appear to have the time to do a bit more, or alternatively they are really effective, so they get given more to do.

You know  the old saying, ‘to get something done, give it to a busy person‘.

Utter nonsense.

We are collaborating too much, but rather than real collaboration, we have groups of people  in close proximity who are not adding value.

What we need is ‘Disciplined Collaboration’.

Collaborating teams that are constructed for diversity in skills and thinking styles, such they  can all add value, and the scope of the collaboration is set by a planned outcome of some sort.

To get a useful result from a collaboration, you need people  who have the capability to contribute to that outcome, not just someone who happens to be walking past at the time a seat needs to be filled.

You need a focus of activity, a problem to be solved, and intent, not a series of meetings of individuals who are not really sure why they are there.