A marketers explanation of Economic Value Added.

A marketers explanation of Economic Value Added.

 

Economic Value Added, EVA, is another of those annoying acronyms accountants tend to use to confuse simple marketers. Therefore, it is a term marketers must understand if they are to hold their own in the boardroom.

EVA is a calculation used to measure the net cash flow from an asset, after taking into account the cost of the capital necessary to acquire that asset. It is often a part of a business case made to support a major investment or M&A proposition.

There are a couple of calculations that need to be made, all from the standard company accounts.

  • The net cash flow is obvious, what comes in versus what goes out, as a result of deploying the asset.
  • The cost of capital will be some combination of the cost of equity and the cost of necessary borrowings.

When the net cash flow is greater than the cost of capital, the asset is generating value. When it is less, it is destroying value.

The formula is simple: EVA = Net cash after tax – capital invested X the weighted cost of that capital.

The shortcomings of an EVA calculation are twofold:

  • It is based on the past. The cost of capital yesterday is unlikely to be the same tomorrow. Interest rates bounce around, and the mix of debt and equity while not as volatile does change with circumstances.
  • Increasingly business transactions are being done on the basis of intangibles. Costing the replacement value of intangibles, is a practise lacking discipline, consistency, and financial rigor.

Building a business case for an investment always requires deep consideration of the cash flow results of that investment. By definition, that requires a forecast of the future be done as the driver of that cash flow.

It is always easier to take the past and extrapolate, than to spend the time and energy building a strategic case for an investment. A strategic case requires that the relative costs and benefits of differing choices be articulated, in an environment of information scarcity. A much more demanding task than constructing a future that is the same as the past, and hoping that this time, it will be.

Header illustration by AI, in a few minutes. 

Four basic strategies to maximise the effectiveness of your marketing investment.

Four basic strategies to maximise the effectiveness of your marketing investment.

 

 

‘Marketing’ & ‘Communication’ are two words that should not be compounded. They have entirely different meanings.

The confusion of meaning amongst quasi marketers is the beginning of wasted marketing budgets. It is also the source of much of the dumb rubbish clogging up the digital pipes.

Following are 4 strategies to increase effectiveness.

Define the objective of the communication.

What seems to happen here is that the tactics become confused with the objectives. This is not about optimising your website, or deciding whether or not to use Facebook ads, it is about creating the outcomes you want. Create demand for a product, generate awareness of the company, attract funding, and many  others may be the objectives of a marketing investment, but they are not the tools for implementation. Lack of clarity of objectives, time frame, and performance metrics, is a basic marketing sin. I always advocate for a SMART framework.

Who is the audience?

Having figured out why you are communicating, the obvious next step is who you need to communicate with. Who is your ideal customer, and who do you need to engage to generate a transaction?

Your ideal customer may be hospitals with specialist surgical services. A relatively specific ideal customer, but inside that customer, there are those who sign the order, engineers who assess regulatory compliance, accountants who have control over budgets, and the medical staff who use the product. All have different concerns and motivations, and all require differing communications.  Understanding the audiences, crafting messages and selecting the channels by which they will be delivered should be second nature.

What does your audience want and need to hear?

Often these are two different communications. They may want to hear about the prices and delivery times, but they need to hear about the regulatory status, availability, and detailed specifications of the range of options being presented to them.

Your task is to clearly communicate what it is you are offering, the benefit it delivers, and why they should care, along with presenting a call to action that is compelling.

How do you communicate?

What is the tone of the messages, and how do you reach the target is the oldest marketing challenge in the book.

Every successful marketing communication is in some form a story. Do you use drama, comedy, a villain, testimonial, or do you use an academic approach to the copy?  This even applies to the blazing headline of a huge price reduction, where that is the only thing in the ad. Even that tells a story to those that see it.

What media is used, newspapers, magazines, social platforms, direct mail, email, digital advertising, face to face? In most cases it will be some combination of these, and many other options available to deliver messages.

While writing this post, it was constantly in my mind that ‘everyone knows this stuff’ and ‘nobody out there needs to be told, again, how to suck eggs’.

However, the weight of crap I see floating across the web, and sadly into my inbox, unsolicited, told me otherwise.

I am confident nobody reading this needs to hear it again, but perhaps you could share it to your less enlightened comrades.

If you want to get noticed, lift your game!

 

Header illustration via DALL-E in 5 seconds.

 

 

 

Why you should be up front with price.

Why you should be up front with price.

 

 

Imagine the difference.

You go into a sales call and the first item on the agenda is the price. The potential buyer knows that the price stated is the price, without variation. The whole conversation therefore is about quality, delivery, and all the other things that make up value to the buyer. It may also save you time by quickly eliminating those for whom the price is beyond their budget or expectations.

On the other hand, when you go into a conversation with the other party believing that price is negotiable, the whole conversation then becomes about price, and not about all the other elements that create value for both parties.

What if we’re undercut by a competitor you cry?

Inevitably that will happen from time to time.

Get used to it.

Two strategic questions about price to ask yourself:

  • Do I want this customer who is prepared to swap supplies for a few bob in the absence of the other services that we provide?
  • Who is it that this competitive supplier is overcharging that we should be talking to?

Most sales conversations I have seen default to debates on price. This does no party any good, as price is only one element of value.

As Benjamin Franklin noted: The bitterness of poor quality remains long after the sweetness of low price is forgotten’.

Header cartoon credit: Tom Fishburne at Marketoonist.com. Thanks Tom!. 

 

 

The critical trade-off made in a remote work environment.

The critical trade-off made in a remote work environment.

 

Amongst the tsunami of gratuitous advice on the web about how to manage remotely, whether you be the team leader, or a team member, there is a critical piece missing.

Depth of strategic thinking.

Regular and managed team video gatherings, as well as a range of individual catch ups for assistance, follow up, mentoring, and all the other things that go on, are tactical.

Particularly in times of crisis and high stress, it is sensible and natural to focus on tactical execution. However, tactical can only take you so far, and in the absence of a strategic framework, can lead you astray quickly.

Consider breaking out specific sessions for the discussion of the strategic issues and questions that emerge. They remain in place irrespective of the current crisis, whatever that may be.

Strategic depth is not something generated in a series of quick meetings. It requires data, forecasts, scenarios and deep discussion and contemplation by people who know the box from the outside, as well as from the inside.

These deeper questions of strategy usually reside in the ‘very important but not urgent‘ basket. In the absence of being addressed, they will be forgotten. Worse still, they will be over-ridden by short term tactical outcomes that would not have been allowed to evolve with sensible strategic oversight in place.

We are social animals, our best work is done when people get together, and together look to solve problems and pressure test assumptions. This takes time and human engagement.  Verbalisation of ideas, questions, and explanations is only a small part of ‘Communication’. Face to face, there are a myriad of non-verbal nuances and contextual contributors to ‘communication’ that are lost over Zoom or Teams.

Failing to accommodate these human interactions will destroy your capacity to generate the insight necessary for deep and productive strategic thinking.

Header credit: Tom Fishburne at Marketoonist. Thanks again for encapsulating a difficult idea in a cartoon.

 

 

 

The huge cost that never shows up in the accounts.

The huge cost that never shows up in the accounts.

Opportunity cost.

The mistakes you make of Commission are the ones by which performance is judged. They show up in a profit and loss and balance sheets of businesses. However, when you pass up a golden opportunity that turns out to be a winner, that ‘cost of potential profit’ does not show up anywhere.

It is a mistake of omission, not commission.

Those of us who failed to buy Apple shares when they were less than a dollar in 2003, and similarly, NVIDIA shares when they were $1.30, might see a missed opportunity. Both now trade at well over 100 times those prices.

However, such mistakes are acceptable when the opportunity is outside what Warren Buffett calls a ‘Circle of competence’. This is the area where you have the expertise to understand the opportunity being offered, but fail to accept it.

In the case of Apple and Nvidia, they are both outside my circle of competence. Therefore, I did not know enough to recognise the opportunity. Had I been immersed in the IT industry it might have been clearer.

Buffett’s seven rules for successful investing, summarised, are:

  • Hire only intelligent people with integrity.
  • Pay attention to facts, not emotions.
  • Buy wonderful businesses, but not ‘cigar butts’
  • Buy only stocks you understand.
  • Seize the opportunity.
  • Don’t sell because of price fluctuations.
  • Buy stocks below what they are worth.

Passing up an opportunity that turns out to be something you should have grabbed, with the benefit of hindsight, means you have failed to give yourself an adequate answer to one, or more, of three simple questions.

  • How much cash would the opportunity deliver to you?
  • When are you going to get it?
  • How sure are you?

Buffett and his late side-kick Charlie Munger are widely seen as geniuses. I suspect Mr Buffett would be embarrassed by that label. He might respond that all he did was follow the simple 7 rules, something most cannot do.