May 26, 2015 | Governance, Leadership, Strategy
cartoon courtesy Hugh McLeod www.gapingvoid.com
Part of what I do day to day is made up of business reviews. Whilst every business is different, and the competitive environment is different, there are some common questions to be asked that tend to reveal the effectiveness and impact of strategic and business planning.
Strategic planning has become a cliché, often just meaning the three day off site that stuffs up your week, and takes some preparation in case you are asked some difficult questions, but following is a checklist of things I look for in a plan, which may assist your thinking.
Major trends. What are the external, big picture things that are, or will impact on your business. Trends such as technology, the regulatory environment, trade barriers, et al that have the potential to change the context in which the plan has to live. These are generally much “bigger” than a one year time frame, although the pace of technical change often gives the lie to that generality.
AAR on previous forecasts. “AAR” is an acronym, “After Action Review” which emerged from the US army after the debacle of Vietnam. They sought to quickly, and from a grass roots perspective, understand what went wrong, what worked, and how it could have been improved. In effect is it a continuous improvement cycle. Applying the same thinking to the previous years forecasts and assumptions always reveals opportunities for learning. If it is the first time, do it for the last 2 or three years, and analyse what the businesses did, or should have learnt from these experiences.
How and why the differences. Planning should be a rolling, self improving process, but so often I see planning done in isolation of the opportunities to learn from the past. Understanding the reasons why forecasts are different from one planning period to another requires an explicit understanding of the assumptions made. This step builds on the AAR above.
How would you double the business. Most business planning tends to be incremental, a 3% increase in sales, a 2% decrease in costs, it is all easy to agree to in a planning meeting, after all, who would not agree to increments of improvement? To get away from incrementalism, consider what it would take to double, or triple the business. What would you need to do differently, what new products, markets, customers would you have to acquire. I like to change the perspective to this by adopting a position 3 years down the track, imagining the business has doubled, and imagining what changes had been necessary, and how they had been implemented. With the benefit of imagined hindsight, what did we do right, what mistakes were made, what capabilities and capacities did we have to increase, how did we fund the increase, all sorts of confronting questions that in the answering offer insights to the planning process.
Where is the growth coming from. Everyone predicts growth, it is part of the commercial DNA, but articulating where it is coming from introduces some reality checks. If it is from a competitor, why will they just let the volume go? what will their reactions be, and how will you in turn react to their responses? If it is from new products, why would a customer buy yours instead of the one they had been buying, and if it is a new market you are creating, how is your value proposition sufficiently compelling to get the attention of a potential customer, and how are you going to justify the new expenditure in a market that they are unfamiliar with?
What are your distinctive strengths, and how does the plan leverage them? It is astonishing to me how often when I ask this question that the responses are reflections of the market table stakes the things you have to do well just to survive and be competitive, they are not distinctive. It is like a watchmaker proudly claiming that their watch tells exact time. So what, to be a watch, you have to be able to reliably tell the time, it is not distinctive, it is table stakes. What makes you distinctive, does something really different, passes Seth Godins “purple cow” test. It may be that your watch is waterproof to 200 meters. Not many will take advantage of this strength, but to some, the guarantee of waterproof performance will be distinctive. The problem now becomes how you reach the small number of those who care at the time the are considering a purchase.
What differentiates you from the competition, and importantly, the potential left field competition? This question is often confused with the one above, a strength is not necessarily a distinctive capability that adds value to a customer that would drive them into your arms. To continue the watch analogy, when the Japanese started delivering digital watches, the Swiss that at that time absolutely dominated the watch market failed to recognise the attraction of the differentiation that had just taken place, and were decimated.
What would a private equity owner do with this business?. This can be a confronting question, but a very useful one. If you look at the business from an entirely different perspective, one whose time frame and investment return metrics are both aggressive, and usually entirely different to the prevailing horizons, it can stimulate some thinking that is very useful, and informs the rest of the discussion.
Creating a strategy that has real “grunt” and articulating that plan to all stakeholders that are impacted, and can contribute is a huge challenge, and takes time, commitment and brain power to achieve. Unfortunately, the success rate of strategic planning is very low, testament to the difficulty, and the number of things that can go wrong.
May 21, 2015 | Customers, Sales
Making an offer they cannot refuse is the ultimate selling outcome, notwithstanding the limitations of the law, and common decency.
So how do you make a Godfather offer?
- Know your customer intimately
- Know their business intimately
- Know their pain-points like they were your own
- Create an offer that removes the pain-points for them
- Make the payoff compelling
- Make the payoff unique
- Present the offer like your life depended on it, with passion, conviction, and from the receivers perspective.
- Create tension in the decision by ensuring there is a decision time after which the offer is off the table.
This works pretty much all the time.
When you are able to the identify components of a problem a potential customer has, for which you have a solution that is both valuable to them, and unique, and you clearly understand all the challenges in their situation, why would they not buy from you?
May 18, 2015 | Change, Customers, Sales
mindset switch
Access to information, the tools to make up our own minds has not just changed our behaviour in the way the sales process works, it has changed our mindset.
In a fundamental way.
We believe information we source ourselves, and distrust anything we are told.
We filter the available information and make up our own minds about the bits we will accept, and blend into our version of the truth.
The power to say no” has never been stronger because there are a myriad of options available to us to get the information ourselves.
I work from a home office, and usually do not answer the home phone, as most of the time it is an unwanted cold sales call, and those who I need to be able to contact me almost always do it via the mobile or email.
However, last week I did answer the phone, and yes it was a sales call, but a pretty good one. A very nice Aussie lady, so her first language was English, rang and politely inquired if she could take a moment to speak about how her insurance company could save me a heap of money.
As it happens, I had been considering just that proposition, I am over 60, work from home, but still pay full whack contents insurance, so I had concluded that I should save some money by changing, or at least negotiating rather than just paying the auto premium.
So what happens when the nice lady rings, I surprise even myself given I had concluded that I should change and said “No thanks”.
It was not her, she did a good job, unlike most cold phone sales calls.
It was not that the timing was wrong, I had decided to do the research and take some action.
It was my mindset.
Being given information on a plate by someone who I saw as having a vested interest was automatically rejected.
Yes, I understood she could help, and that it was great timing, but the opportunity was still rejected almost without thought.
Imagine how hard it is to make a sale when all the stars are not aligned, when you cannot even get past the front door when they are!
Selling used to be a staged process with information delivered by someone who had the access you did not have, but needed to make a purchase decision.
No more.
The process has been completely disrupted and reversed, all the power is with the buyer, and if you try and sell them, even the if tools you use smell of you trying to sell them, you lose because the automatic response now is “No”
Think about it the next time you set about motivating the sales force at the Friday rev up, as you will probably just be wasting everyone’s time if you do not recognise and accommodate the mindset change that has occurred in the last decade.
May 15, 2015 | Branding, Customers, Innovation, Marketing
innovation comes from dot joining
Before 3M came out with the now ubiquitous little yellow pad of semi stuck sheets, nobody realised they needed them.
There was no clamour for sticky note papers to use as messages, place-holders, and the thousand other uses we have found for them, no market research pointed at the opportunity.
Someone connected the unconnected dots.
The story goes that there was a failed glue experiment in the 3M lab archives. One of the product lines of 3M is glue, sticky stuff used as a joining agent with uses from the home to building sites and industrial applications. Researcher Spencer Silver was seeking a super strong adhesive, the line of experiments was deemed a failure, it was not glue, it did not stick, although it seemed to be re-useable, the stickiness was not strong. It was however, long lived. One of 3M’s employees who was also the member of a local church congregation choir, frustrated that his placeholders kept dropping out of his hymn book made the connection, and a product was born.
Point is the research had been done, there was a solution in the archives in search of a problem.
The challenging task for innovators and marketers is to put ourselves in the position where we can connect the solution with the problem.
That does not happen in the office, it happens where there are conversations happening, often random conversations, between people with vaguely connected networks and ideas.
The science of networking indicates we get more from those we know vaguely than from our very close peers.
Why?
Because those close to us are typically the same as us, similar views, experiences and attitudes, exposed to the same sorts of stimuli, that is why they are close to us.
The revelations, the connection of the unconnected dots usually comes from left field those who we know, but not well, who circulate in different groups to us, have different knowledge, networks and interests to us.
Go talk to them, network, engage, step out of your comfort zone, and with time, curiosity, and yes, lady luck does play a role, you might find your Post-it-note. You will almost certainly not find it if the only place you look is inside your own patch.
May 13, 2015 | Branding, Marketing
Courtesy: Tom Fishburne
Putting together a good brief is a foundation of successful business, whether it be a brief to a creative agency, engineering team, or outsourced service of some type, and irrespective of the platform to be used, a great brief plays a key role in achieving your goals.
Following are some simple rules to follow. The weight you put on them may differ depending on circumstances, but the principals remain.
- Describe what you are setting out to do. Sell a service, create a product, evoke a feeling, whatever it is, if the reader does not know in detail what you are setting out to do, how can you expect them to deliver.
- What do you want the receiver to do with the information we are giving them. When developing a creative brief, it helps the creatives to know what your choices of media are, how you want your logo to be displayed, and any cultural imperatives. Do not expect them to be able to read your mind. An engineering brief will be different, but same idea, give as much specific information as possible.
- Who is the audience for the final product. The greater the level of detail, the better. “Women over 35” is better than “all women”, and “women between 35 and 50 with executive jobs in the private sector with two children” is better still. The greater the level of detail the better the potential outcomes from the briefed activity can be.
- What does the target audience feel about the existing products and categories they buy. Having an idea of the current state of mind of the target audience is pretty important if you are setting out to change their behaviour and as a result their long term attitudes and preferences.
- What do you want them to feel about this new offer. In other words, after they have seen our offer, how do we want them to feel, and as a result, act?
- What are the key differentiators of our offer? What makes this alternative better than the others?
- How will this differentiator make a difference to the lives of those who buy it? Even if it a box of soap powder, this rule holds. It is the answer to the consumers question “Why should I buy this?
- Finally, any specific things that must be there, or indeed, cannot be there.
Sorting all this stuff out for the brief also ensures that you have thought about all the alternatives and issues before you take up the resources of the “brifees” in considering the brief.
Better yet, having a great brief gives you a basis to make an objective decision about the best alternative offered, and whether or not it meets your commercial needs.
