Sep 6, 2013 | Governance, Management
How often have you been in a position of trying to get something done in the face of an illogical or bureaucratic impediment ?
It is enormously frustrating, Authority being exercised.
On the other hand when faced with complexity, ambiguity, or technology beyond our knowledge and understanding, sensible people seek advice from an authority, someone who knows more than us, and can clarify and explain.
This person often has no authority, but is an authority.
So often these two things get tangled up. Someone “in authority” exercises that authority as would “an authority”, and the outcome is usually rubbish.
As management of our institutions has become flatter, more collaborative and individually accountable, this distinction has become more important as those with the authority are less and less likely to also be an authority on any given topic.
Failure to recognise the distinction is a huge burden on productivity.
Sep 5, 2013 | Customers, Demand chains, Marketing
Creating a demand chain out of an environment forged by a competitive and opaque supply chain mentality is no small task.
This change is particularly challenging in agriculture where there is considerable regulatory and interest group oversight and thousands of years of trading DNA pre-digital.
However, why should the agricultural supply chain be immune to the collaborative revolution spawned by the availability of digital data sweeping every other industry. Clearly, agriculture should not, so those who can conceive the future will have the opportunity to own it.
The characteristics of successful collaborative ventures appear to be similar irrespective of the market they operate in. Accommodation to car hire to books, where there is a market that can benefit from information, a logistic chain that is suboptimal, and a supplier base that opens up to change, the characteristics of a successful demand chain are similar.
- They are Transparent. End to end, the availability, costs, and value add is clear to all who can benefit from the knowledge.
- They are collaborative. Each component of the chain recognizes that their individual best interests are best served by serving the best interests of the chain.
- They are consumer centric. Delivering to consumers is at the core of the drivers of the chain. Sometimes this requires re-engineering of an existing chain, in effect innovating the delivery of an existing product or service, but increasingly emerging are value propositions made possible by new technology, driving development of demand chains that would not have been possible just a few years ago, like airbnb, Lyft, and Zappos.
Each of these characteristics adds to the capacity of the chain to reflect demand back through the chain, igniting the activity required to fill the demand.
Sep 3, 2013 | Governance, Innovation, Marketing, Operations, Strategy
I have just been a part of a post investment review with a client, looking at what a significant investment in capital equipment has delivered, compared to the planned outcomes, that underpinned the Capex.
Not a pretty sight, and now they have to learn the lessons to avoid repeating the mistakes.
Over the course of the exercise, the marketing manager consistently blathered about the accountability of the engineering staff in the process, but when cornered on marketing accountability to the product and market specifications against which the investment was made, and the effectiveness of the launch, and post launch activity, he had nothing.
Marketers have cried forever that the money spent on marketing is an investment, not an expense, but often this has a hint of self preservation about it.
However, if we are fair dinkum (Aussie for honest with ourselves) we should also be prepared to undergo a rigorous process to measure the effectiveness of our marketing investment.
Marketing however, has substantial elements of the “qualitative” about it. Creativity, being different, a better approach, all of which are best measured in hindsight.
Having measured, and with the benefit of hindsight seen a better way, surely the gap could be termed a “Marketing Debt”, the amount pissed away because the idea, execution, CVP, or something else was not up to scratch.
If we figure out how to keep a running score, weighted by hindsight and the continuous improvement enabled by the analytics and A/B testing now possible, we might even convince the beanies that marketing really is an investment.
Sep 2, 2013 | Communication, Management, Small business, Social Media
Digital technology has offered all of us an astounding range of opportunities to challenge and interact with our social environment, creating as we go. Gary Hamel has summarised them into a “5 C” list,:
Contribution
Connection
Creation
Choice
Challenge.
You read them, you just know the truth of it, but the next step, the really hard one, is how to harness the potential energy unleashed by these revolutions.
As a consultant to small businesses, I find no lack of energy, determination, and intelligent, informed risk taking, but I do find that the digital revolution has marched past the capabilities of many of the established businesses, and as time passes, the gap just becomes wider.
Recognising the presence of the capability gap, and finding a way to bridge it is rapidly becoming the most significant challenge faced by SME’s. Until that bridging has happened, digital is a millstone rather than a freedom, and freedom feels great!.
Go for it.
Aug 30, 2013 | Change, Marketing, Social Media
As a boy, I used to go to the local grocer with a few bob in a knotted handkerchief, get a standard bag of goodies, bread, butter, and a few chops in return. The grocer knew what my Mum had sent me to get, and she knew about how much it would cost, and any discrepencies were fixed up later.
Those days are gone, the days when there was a personal relationship, when people were the centre of business, and trust was not something we thought about, it just was there.
In today’s terminology, business was social.
What replaced it was an industrial model where scale and machines dominated. It does not matter much weather you are thinking about cars, supermarkets, or farming, the analogy holds, just the timing changes a bit.
Impersonal, disconnected, and trust has disappeared, which is perhaps the greatest loss.
Now however, the people seem to be making a comeback.
The advent of social media was at first just another “mechanical” thing, it offered scale and access with little humanity, but as it has evolved, and the platforms developed, so have our behavior patterns and expectations.
Social media is becoming a “humanity enabler” that offers the benefits of scale and automation, but that is enabling the reconnection of people. Trust is also making a comeback, just think about the value you put into the reviews on Amazon or Ebay, whilst you do not know anybody who has done the reviews personally, they are way better than a paid advertisement.
I do not see the pendulam swinging back again, as we are becoming so re-engaged with people, but I guess it will, and those that see the inflexion points first will be, as usual, those that have the opportunity to make the most of them.
