Mar 26, 2013 | Branding, Marketing, Social Media
Everybody has something to say, and the democratisation of the web means everyone has the opportunity.
Just take a look at the twitter feeds of some of the big brands, some inane crap written by a 10 year old intellect can attract thousands of “likes”, and the wombats breed just to provide more of them.
So what?. Why should these big brands bother? Surely such nonsense detracts from their brand?
Well, to my mind they shouldn’t do it, building and maintaining a brand is hard enough without putting extra lead in the saddlebags.
On the contrary, the opportunity to say something of value, pass on some wisdom, offer useful advice is now easier than it has ever been. Those thoughts need to be heard, debated, and they add to our lives.
Just a pity that we have to wade through the mountains of crap, despite all the filtering and prioritisation tools available, to find the interesting stuff.
Mar 22, 2013 | Branding, Communication, Marketing, Social Media
Digital communication is now a major consideration in any marketing budget, depending on whose numbers you believe, digital may now be even bigger than “traditional” communication channels.
So how should you develop your creative and communication briefs?
- Concentrate on traditional channels and adapt for Digital?
- Focus on digital and use traditional as the adjunct?
- Split the budget and treat them separately, or consider the cart and horse to be the one integrated delivery vehicle?
Making these choices, deciding which is the horse, the one that provides the “grunt,” you need and requiring real feeding, and which is the cart, which just needs some maintanence, is the key decision. Then you need to decide how you are going to manage the processes of feeding and maintaining, as they require very different strategies and capabilities.
Traditional media is passive, one way, the objective is to disrupt to gain attention and only then deliver a message with no effective feedback mechanism.
Digital media is wholly different. It has the native capability to be two way, a “conversation,” it cannot disrupt as the initiative is with the receiver rather than the sender, the originator can micro-target to the level of individuals, and there are immediate and hugely detailed feedback loops.
All this means that the manner in which the proposition is presented is entirely different, passive, mass creative Vs a message demanding action of an individual.
When put like that, the dilemma becomes more transparent, relatively easily addressed by a few simple questions:
- Is it a commodity, mass market product, or are you building a market customer by customer?
- Are you aiming to build awareness amongst a wide market profile or engagement of a niche?
- Can you identify and target the behavioral characteristics of your target market, or just the demographic ones?
The answers to these questions will offer insight not just to which is the horse, but how much, and what it needs to be fed to deliver the optimum result.
Mar 4, 2013 | Branding, Communication, Marketing, Social Media
Most of my networks are small businesses, and pretty much everyone I talk to who is using social media in some way consider it as a part of their sales strategy, a tool to increase sales. Many would concede it is a marketing tool first, but why do it if sales do not come, and how do you measure success other than by sales?
The marketers amongst you will shudder.
What social media is good at is raising awareness, creating engagement and advocacy, what it is not good at is being a transactional process. Social media is not transactional at all, it does not create sales, rather it creates a conversation, the environment in which sales can be made, but the sales process itself is separate.
A subtle difference perhaps, but hugely important in any consideration of the return that comes from an investment in Social Media.
Mar 1, 2013 | Branding, Communication, Social Media
I recently sat through what should have been a very interesting presentation. The proposition fascinating, the data extensive, the qualifications of the presenter exemplarity. It is a pity, but a few minutes after it was over, none of the data was remembered.
All I can now recall is the scene setter the presenter used, the story he told which in his mind was just a warm up to the real stuff, the data that made the argument.
To me, the scene setter was the whole story, the data just a way to fill in a boring 25 minutes, and almost completely dispensable.
The lesson in this is that the social interaction we experience, or that are shared with us, are powerful conveyors of a message we recall, understand, and possibly act upon.
All the data in the world cannot do more than support the case, fill in the detail, and create quantitative foundations out of qualitative hypotheses. but it will always be the stories that stick in our memories.
Feb 27, 2013 | Branding, Communication, Marketing, Social Media
Social media is a part of the marketing toolbox, an increasingly important one, so why does it so often get shuffled out to the side, assigned to the 20 year old intern, when it can have a profound impact on your customers and market?.
Marketing is all about demand generation, it is a very wide set of activities, behaviors, and attitudes that build an expectation of brand and pr0oduct performance. It covers everything from the usual promotional and advertising stuff people think about, to the little things, the cleanliness of the company logoed delivery truck, ( I always recall the shiny red Arnotts vans, to me they are a metaphor for the brand, sadly, there is not even a good photo on the web) to the way the receptionist answers the phone, and many other things. The “welcome quotient” of the brand.
We do all this stuff in the real world, but ignore much of it in the digital one, simply by ignoring the expectation that visitors want to feel as welcome digitally as they are personally.
Many websites are distinctly unwelcoming, muddled, untidy, hard to navigate and offering little encouragement to engage further. This post by Jay Baer lists 11 reasons people do not engage, and is a great list of the common problems I see, most of which are r4elatively easily addressed.
Feb 18, 2013 | Branding, Communication, Marketing, Strategy
Marketers are becoming increasingly sophisticated in the ways they leverage understanding of how the brain works to build competitive advantage.
20 years ago most marketing positioning, segmentation and communication was based around demographic factors, but we have been increasingly understanding the linkages between a whole range of factors and individual behavior in a rang of circumstances as we have been able to collect and analyse data. This understanding has evolved to the point where the old fashioned demographic segmentation and positioning now looks like a Model T in the 2012 Paris motor show.
The evolving marketing skill is understanding how the brain works in order to gain commercial advantage, work that is based on academic medical research. But this research is just conforming what good marketers have known for some time, albeit intuitively. Simon Sinek’s simple “Why What How” presentation that has garnered almost 10 million YouTube views is just a marketers interpretation of Neuromarketing being applied.
