Oct 19, 2015 | Customers, Marketing, Sales, Small business
Strategic Key Account Planning
Almost every organisation I have dealt with uses some variation of the accepted sales funnel model.
Start by gathering as many leads as possible, then progressively whittle them down through the funnel until you have a customer. The practice is always way more chaotic than the nicely drawn funnel, as leads enter and exit the funnel at various times for various reasons. Chaotic is usually an appropriate expression.
When you think about it, there is a huge amount of waste in the process.
You start with many, and expend considerable resources to turn leads, of which a large majority are unlikely ever to be customers, into prospects, into hot prospects, (or whatever creative name you call them) then create a transaction, then hopefully to build a relationship.
In most B2B situations, this simply does not make sense.
Would it not be far better to spend a fraction of the resources identifying your ideal customer based on your value proposition, then identifying the decision makers and their procurement processes in those ideal customers, then setting out to engage them with personalised marketing?
This is in effect turning the funnel upside down, but recognising that prospect behaviour is unpredictable if not chaotic, it may be that the pyramid, in what ever orientation is the wrong metaphor.
Why not use a cycle of some sort, with the central objective of creating a relationship with the key customers and prospects in your industry.
Digital technology is making this easier by the day to execute, but the foundations of good marketing have not changed. Digital technology cannot change those foundations, the things you simply have to get right to earn the confidence of a prospect to give you their money.
Oct 16, 2015 | Collaboration, Customers, Marketing, Small business
local business is your business
Small business owners seem always struggle to find the ways to build their business. B2B, B2C, does not matter, the challenges are similar.
How do you identify, engage, then build towards a transaction and relationship with people to whom your product or service solves a problem, and adds value too their lives?.
In my local area, there are a significant number of networking groups, ranging from community based ones to expensive franchise operations. I am a member of two groups, plus a local chamber of commerce. It takes work, but they do deliver results. In observing the behaviour in these groups of those who are successful, there are some pretty common things that can most small businesses can learn to do better.
1. Elevator Pitch. It amazes me how few can state in a few words what they do, what problems they solves, what outcomes can be achieved, and why their services are worth consideration. It should not be hard, but it is. Developing a good elevator pitch should be a priority.
2. Think local. Most small businesses find most of their business in the local area. It seems therefore to make sense to invest in the activities of the local area, from being a voice in the community groups such as Rotary, to sponsoring the local kids sporting teams with playing gear. A little bit of time and effort, but very little money can go a long way in a community.
3. Be vocal. Communities offer all sorts of ways to engage and make it clear what you stand for. A builder might be a protector of the architectural heritage of an area, the local sports store agitate to turn the local dump into playing fields, a bike shop might be the lead voice in having some waste land rezoned to enable building a bike track. The list can be as long as your imagination.
4. Collaborate. Locasl can build scale by collaborating, cross promoting, and assisting each other in all sorts of ways. Again, being open to ideas and opportunities can reap large rewards. My local bottle shop holds tastings on a fairly regular basis. They secure the time of the winemaker of a high quality small winery, who then takes a small group through the current releases, a vertical tasting, or whatever is appropriate, and over the course of the evening, the Japanese café next door delivers some terrific ‘nibblies’ Everyone wins.
5. Leverage the network. Local networking groups of various types do deliver value, but like all things of value, success only comes with work. Others need to understand what you do, how you deliver value, why they should use you instead of an alternative, they need to find common ground and build some trust. Going to the meetings is just the start.
6. Referrals. An adjunct to the networking activity, it pays to ask for the job, or referrals. Network theory clearly demonstrates that the networks of those in your network are the most potent source of leads there is. Many people feel that asking for a referral is not good form, remove that notion from your mind. Members of a networking group are all there for the same reason, to build their business, so they will not mind, and so long as you are prepared to reciprocate.
7. Offers. Offering an incentive of some sort always helps. A friend runs a small suburban bistro, open 6 days a week. He is booked solid Friday, Saturday, and Sunday evenings, but has to carry the overheads of being open and able to provide services at other times. He is always creating offers of his slow times, two for one, a bottle of champagne on the table, cakes for birthdays, on and on, in order to get bums in seats in the slow times, and as a result has a thriving business, with many repeat customers across the week.
All this stuff can be done as a part of your general marketing activities, it adds a critical personal dimension very challenging and expensive to achieve with any form of media. The range of options for small businesses has never been wider, and never forget that people buy from people far more than they buy from businesses.
Oct 13, 2015 | Customers, Marketing, retail, Sales, Small business
Innovation in supermarkets
Small business suppliers to supermarket chains are substantially compromised by the lack of resources to innovate.
Peter Drucker stated 50 years ago that innovation is the only really sustainable competitive advantage, and the passage of events have proved him correct.
Commercial survival requires that you are able to continually innovate, or you rapidly find yourself left behind, simply because everybody else is.
Knowing this does not however, make the challenge any less daunting, especially in an environment like FMCG where the retail gorillas stamp on variation as a source of transaction costs, and are actively seeking to reduce SKU numbers by pushing housebrands.
Lets define what we mean by innovation for the purposes of this post.
It does not include business model and process innovation. Both are terrific ways towards commercial sustainability, are paths every business must follow, but have little to do with innovation from the customer perspective, at least in the short to medium term.
By contrast, product innovation is concerned with new stuff that adds value to consumers.
Pretty simple definition, that precludes line extensions, which are just a fact of life, and product changes, which are again a fact of life. We are seeking to talk about the things that really make a difference, and how and why that happens.
Following are some thoughts on the nature of the strategic environment we find ourselves competing.
Innovation Paradox. Big businesses get big by being able to reproduce things without variation, their processes ensure consistency, and reject the outliers. This goes as much for people as it does products, so generally large businesses have more difficulty seeing and acting on something new than small ones. There are obvious exceptions, and large businesses everywhere are seeking ways to overcome the innovative inconvenience of their scale, with greatly differing levels of success. Nevertheless, the generality holds, but the small business end of the FMCG supply chain has been decimated, perhaps almost eradicated by the scale of the supermarkets and the power of their business model. Where is the innovation going to come from I wonder.
Risk. The risk profile of every business is different, but as a generality small businesses have a greater capacity to take risky decisions, but a less capacity to absorb them when they go pear-shaped. Large businesses survive on consistency as noted, and success for individuals in a large business is usually counted by their successes, failures are frowned upon, so the tendency to take risks is reduced, hence, their inability to innovate. Again there are notable exceptions, but they always occur when there is a leader who mandates and lives risk tolerance.
Wide view. Any organisation, no matter how big, only has a small proportion of the people thinking about the categories they compete in, so why do you think you will come up with the great ideas? Those using what I have always called “Environmental Research” always do better. This has nothing to do with hugging trees, and everything to do with understanding the context in which the behaviour of your consumers happens. When you understand the context, and see shifts, the opportunities suddenly become more easily identified.
Habit. Consumers are driven by their own habits, and once formed, it takes a lot of effort to break them. Habits work because they make our lives easier, and we are loathe to risk what we know works, for that for which there may be a question.
Boundaries. Innovation efforts need boundaries, or they tend to wander off into irrelevancy. I have found it far better to provide those boundaries in the pre-workshop, if that is what you are doing, material. It is necessary to encourage people to as the cliché goes, “think outside the box” but it is counter productive to have people thinking outside the municipality. Far better to ground the process in a context that is familiar, where there is market and customer knowledge available to feed the process. Without such grounding you tend to get uncertainty and irrelevancy, and ideas and conversation that skates across the surface rather than digging deep to where the problems and opportunities that provide the fodder of successful innovation are buried. I love the metaphor of Classical music and Jazz in the context of innovation, the score provides the boundaries. To be a good classical music player, you need to be a master of your instrument, and be able to reproduce note perfectly what the composer has written, the allowable variation is very small, the emphasis is on technique. Jazz by contrast requires that you are a master of the instrument, as well as the music to the extent that you can take what a composer has written and innovate around the base rhythm and melody, so you need to be not just a master technician, but a master of the music. Great innovation in a commercial environment has exactly the same characteristics.
Think different. The great 1997 Apple advertisement said it all, but how many corporate entities will tolerate the crazy ones? Very few. If you are to truly be an innovator, somehow you have to accommodate some crazy ones. Generally they are tough going, irreverent, unconcerned with status and the status quo, constantly irritating the nice smooth flow of processes that deliver the consistency that corporates thrive on.
Problem definition. Innovation occurs when a problem is solved. Often it is an old problem solved in a new way, sometimes it is a problem unrecognised until the solution comes along, the classic example being the post-it-note. A huge part of the challenge of innovation is the identification of the problem. Rarely does a problem emerge with a fully-fledged solution, but as Einstein, in my view one of the greatest marketing thinkers who never receives any credit at all once said, “if I had an hour to solve a live changing problem, I would spend the first 55 minutes defining the problem, the rest is just maths.”
Margin maintenance. This is tangled up with risk profile, but is separate. Over the years I have done many proposals for new products killed at the gate by the margin problem. “If we launch this, it will erode our margins” often true, but the standard response I give is “better us than someone else”, but it is often a futile response when the ultimate decision maker is compensated by short term considerations. After all, Kodak managed to survive for 40 years after they invented the digital camera in1975, several generations of CEO had passed through in that time, all taking their packet, it was just the last in the line who had a problem.
Value not just price. Consumers look for “value”, but way too often that is translated by suppliers and the retailer into “price”. Price is just one way of reflecting value, but it is the most obvious, and easiest to articulate.
Barriers. Every industry has its own set of barriers to innovation in addition to the more general ones above. In the case of the Australian packaged goods industry, they are several, all associated with the concentration of power in the retail trade.
Margin squeeze
Speed of house brand copying the successful products
Timing of distribution and advertising
On shelf management of facings, cut in, position, promotional programs and stock weight
13 week “live or die” time
On shelf upfront costs
Category management if you are not the category captain, and few small businesses are, you are at a significant disadvantage
Risk averse retailers
Habit. Everyone is used to doing business in a certain way, so that is the way it is done.
Opportunities for suppliers.
Similarly to barriers, every industry has its own unique set of opportunities that when seen are open for businesses to chase.
Social media. FMCG suppliers have not yet solved the problems of how to best use social media to market their process in supermarkets.
Mobility. Engagement with the web and its tools is now mobile, a majority of net interactions are mobile, and most people have their smart phones with them all the time. Using this capability and the geo-location capability to foster a direct relationship between the brand owner and the consumer with the supermarket playing the distributor role is a real opportunity currently under-recognised and utilised.
Food service and ingredient. These are fragmented markets, where innovation, service and brand can still play a real role, and getting a return on your investment is still up to the quality of your business, not the whim of a buyer in a gorilla suit. Depending on whose numbers you use, sales outside the major chains of ingredient and to food service outlets from fine dining to fast food, is north of 60 $billion.
Digital coupons. Retailers in Australia have ensured that the redeemable coupon, so prevalent in the US does not get a start here, too much transaction cost, but a digital coupon? Why not? There have been several tries of various types, Groupon being the most obvious, but smartphones make it so much easier to collect coupons and redeem them in some way, not necessarily even associated with the retailer.
Range optimisation. Category management as it has evolved has always been data intensive, and from a retailers perspective, the objective has been margin optimisation. The next step I suspect will be range optimisation which is really just margin optimisation with a far greater understanding of consumer behaviour thrown into the mix. We have all operated with the view that our various research tools and their data gave us enough to work with, and they did, but suddenly there is the “big data” behaviour mining opportunity offered by social media and geo location, in addition to the fragmentation of times we shop, and how we place and receive orders. Range optimisation to accommodate all these changes just became in my humble view, the FMCG marketing challenge of the decade.
Innovation from the waste. Until very recently, produce that was outside the specs for appearance was consigned to the waste bin, juicing, and other marginal uses, it was not deemed good enough by retailers to sell, not because it was nutritionally or organolepticly deficient, but because it looked crook. Along came the idea of highlighting the products visual imperfections, “Imperfect pick” is the term Harris Farm have used, Canadian chain Loblaws has successfully rolled out “ugly fruit” in Canada, and both Woolies and Coles appear to be tinkering with the idea currently. There are a myriad of opportunities to utilise undervalued product to build a category, for example, shin bones are the foundation of Osso Bucco, many of us will sample great Osso Bucco at an Italian restaurant, but never cook it at home, when it is an easy, tasty meal with a very low meat cost. Pretty simple marketing I would have thought.
Innovation is tough, but it is also fun and makes the future. Those who just wait for the future to happen will be overwhelmed by it, those who take a role in shaping it will at least have the chance to do well.
This post is the 8th in the series examining the means by which small businesses can deal with the retail gorillas.
The one that started it, back in October 2014, is a summary of the 10 ways to beat the gorillas at their own game, a summary post that generated a lot of interest, so I expanded the individual points in subsequent posts.
The first expanded post was the 3 essential pieces of the business model
The second, 5 ways to compete with data
Third, 6 category management ideas for small business at Christmas
Fourth, 9 imperatives for small businesses to build a brand
Fifth deals with the reality for all supermarket suppliers, that they have two customer types, requiring different approaches.
Sixth, deals with the least understood large cost impact on small businesses: Transaction costs.
Seventh suggested ways for small businesses to collaborate for scale,
Sep 4, 2015 | Customers, Marketing, Small business
So, you managed to get that cold email opened by the recipient.
Well done, past the first hurdle.
The next is to create an environment where the opener does something you want as a result of the opening, your next step in the process of engaging towards a transaction.
If you do not have one, why bother in the first place?
A couple of weeks ago I opened a cold email, simply because the headline promised something I had been actively seeking. A simple CRM system designed for small B2B businesses looking at the opportunities offered by sales and marketing automation to scale their businesses. Exactly the thing I had been looking for to assist one of my clients.
In addition, I could see from the auto-preview that it was directed at me, and that there was a logical connection.
I have reproduced it below:
A review of CRM options for SME’s contemplating a first step.
Dear Allen,
I was in the audience at the recent presentation you gave to small business CEO’s in the AFGC forum. I fully agreed with most of the points you made, and you raised a few I had not considered.
One of them was the difficulty many SME’s have taking that first step into marketing automation, usually a simple CRM implementation. I see from your Linkedin profile and significant number of blog posts that this is the sort of thing you run into regularly.
Attached is a review of a number of systems I completed a short time ago, which I thought might be of value to you.
I will ring you at 8.50 am next Thursday, and if you are available, hopefully take 5 minutes to see what you thought of the systems reviewed.
Kind regards
Stephen
He did ring at 8.50 the following Thursday, we did have a conversation, way longer than 5 minutes, my choice, and it is likely that we will do some business.
Lets look at what he did right:
- The headline of the email promised to deliver a benefit, something that may make my life easier.
- The email had been highly personalised, and was complementary of the work I had done.
- The CTA was crystal clear. He would ring me at a specified time, for a chat that almost required me to have read the attachment to participate. It would almost have been rude of me to have been unavailable and unprepared.
- He promised to take up only 5 minutes. How could I not give 5 minutes to someone who had gone to all that trouble, and who possibly had a solution to a problem in front of me.
Are your email campaigns as targeted?
Do you do the work up front to give yourself the best chance of creating a qualified lead?
