Jul 21, 2010 | Category, Customers, Sales
So much choice in everything we do, isn’t that great?
Maybe not.
There is so much choice in most things that now we are running the risk of paralysis, procrastination, and often, we just walk away.
Barry Schwartz, a psychologist and terrific communicator puts the hypothesis that in western societies, less choice would make us happier, a view somewhat at odds with the conventional wisdom that greater choice is one of the great benefits of economic and social development.
Consider what is happening in supermarkets. Retailers are setting out to drive category growth, suppliers are fighting each other for a share of the existing, and the growth, usually by line extensions, and each wonder why all the activity leads to the same sized cake being cut up a bit differently but at great cost to all parties.
Perhaps the array of choice is causing the potential growth to turn around and walk out the door, confused and uncertain?
Jul 19, 2010 | Customers, Operations
In Australia, the major chains are seeking ways to expand their scope of activities, and staying within the Trade Practices Act is increasingly difficult given the dominance of the “big two”, and now the “rest” have further consolidated with the take-over of Franklins by Metcash.
Logistics costs in Australia are very high, given the centralisation of manufacturing, and the long distances, so the initiative of Wal-Mart in the US, and Wal-mart owned ASDA in the UK is significant to the planning of Australian manufacturers.
It is only a matter of time before Australian supermarket executives start looking harder for competitive advantage by going back through the logistic chain in an effort to reduce their costs, and enhance their competitive position. Woolworths have been very successful so far, and the further success of Wal-mart in going back down the supply chain will only prompt them again.
Jul 11, 2010 | Branding, Communication, Customers, Sales
It is often pretty easy recognise marketing hyperbole when we see it, particularly in a category where we have some knowledge. However, in a category where we have no knowledge, it probably is not as easy to pick the fact from the flummery, so even some of the more extravagant claims made may get through the mental fence.
Therefore, hyperbolic claims extolling the virtues of a new small car for example, are more likely to be rejected by the men who may engage with the ad, because they largely believe they know a bit about cars, rather than women, who believe they know little about cars, and are therefore less able to pick the BS from the facts.
This becomes very relevant when marketing a product to a category of consumers who know a bit about the product, and are therefore going to be more critical of the message based on what they know, or believe they know about the category, so be careful of the hyperbole, it will almost always turn off potential buyers, rarely persuade them.
Jul 6, 2010 | Customers, Innovation, Marketing, Strategy
The easier it is to quantify, the less it will be worth. This appears to be a pretty harsh judgment, but the reality is that if you can quantify and standardise something, it can be copied.
This is the case, until you consider the value created by subtle differences, particularly in consumer products, and original creations, a painting, poem, piece of music , new gadget, a new expression, or a new use for a staple product
An original Van Gough is worth tens of millions, but a copy it would take an expert to pick, done by very capable technicians in China, can be had for a modest amount. It is not that the copy is a lesser painting technically, it is just not the original.
Seeking the original is the core of innovation and commercial sustainability, as the alternative is to chase the cost curve to the bottom, where in the long run, the best return possible for the lowest cost producer is around the cost of capital.
Jul 1, 2010 | Customers, Marketing, Social Media
As a group, you may not like something. A style of music, a literary style, a type of product, a group of people, but when you see one of the group individually, and find you like it, or them, the rest of the genre becomes less confronting.
It is the same with brands, the closer you get to a part of the brand, the easier it is to find things about the whole that you like, and you can more easily justify involvement, and scoff at your previous dislike. Cognitive dissonance at work.
By definition you only get closer to a brand if it is delivering something to you, so it is a bit of a circular process, but the lesson for markets is that to build a brand, you need to get close.
The tools of “getting close” have changed, they used to be largely one way communication mechanisms, but now we have the power and tools of the web, so get close, engage, embrace, and succeed.
Jun 27, 2010 | Branding, Customers, Marketing, Small business
“Cheap” implies less of everything that is important, not built to last, minimal attention to the detail, and certainly little customer service. However, “Frugal” implies a discipline that ensures that waste is eliminated, unnecessary features eliminated, but the basic performance is not compromised.
Cheap is never the outcome of good marketing, but Frugal is a very potent positioning in most markets, and is often ignored in the search for wider customer appeal.
Next time, ask yourself, if it is cheap, in which case, don’t buy or produce it, or frugal, in which case it may be a good deal.
