Is ‘Sales’ really just a numbers game?

Is ‘Sales’ really just a numbers game?

 

Contrary to much advice, sales is not just a pure numbers game, the quality of the numbers make more difference than the numbers themselves.

Throw the net widely to attract prospects, the more the better, is the common mantra. It implies anyone who shows the slightest interest is automatically in the net, and so becomes a consumer of resources as efforts are made to lead them down the ‘funnel’ to a transaction.

Sound about right?

What nonsense.

If you had 1,000 people and a 1% conversion rate, you would make 10 sales. if you had 100 good prospects and converted 10%, you would make 10 sales. The transaction numbers are the same, but the latter would be far superior, as rather than spend resources chasing the 990 that would not convert, you have cut down to 90, leaving a lot of sales resource to be off doing something useful.

You do need to fish where the fish are, but it helps to make sure that the species around is what you are looking for, and that the bait is right, otherwise, you will just catch a cold.

The lesson is to focus your efforts on your ideal customer, where you will get the most leverage for your resources. This means you do some work up front to identify the characteristics of your ideal customer, then qualify early and hard to husband sales resources and direct them to the point of greatest impact.

Yes, sales is a numbers game, but the quality of the numbers makes the difference between productive and broke.

It reminds me of the legendary copywriter Gary Halbert’s advice when he’d ask an audience for the best way to sell a hamburger.

At seminars, Gary would throw out that question and people would respond:

… Make the juiciest burger…

… Have the best location…

… Provide the quickest service…

… Create a killer sauce…

And so on.

Gary would then give the correct answer, which was…

Find a starving crowd!

When you need a sounding board to find your starving crowd, give me a call, I’ve been finding them for 40 years..

 

Where do your ‘edge’ opportunities hide?

Where do your ‘edge’ opportunities hide?

Edges are often fuzzy, but are where the action happens, in nature and in business.

At the edge, there is less homogeneity, more opportunity for the different and interesting to be seen, trialled, and if successful take hold. By contrast, in the ‘middle’ there is little but homogeneity. It is why large businesses have trouble with innovation, their model is to do the same thing repeatedly, optimising it continuously, removing the opportunity for the unusual and unexpected to influence the way things are done.

If you think about where the ‘edges’ are in your business, they seem to fall into three categories:

The technology edge: where the existing technical status quo bumps up against development happening elsewhere. These days this is remarkably common. I once found a simple Bill of Materials program based on MS Access for a client. It successfully managed his inventory, costs, and associated information in the form of a program designed to manage the recipes and inventory in a restaurant. It worked perfectly well in an entirely different environment; the names just needed some changing.

The customer edge. The point at which you initially interact with your new customers and engage with potential customers is an edge. The interpretation of your value proposition changes depending on the context, and the challenges faced by people inhabiting a niche you may not have seen or considered relevant.

The core/non-core edge. This is an ‘internal’ edge. What is seen by the leaders as core and what is non-core to a business. The debate about what is core, and what is non-core capabilities, and competitive advantage started by the outsourcing movement 30 years ago remains. Enterprises seek operational excellence and differentiation by innovation at the same time. Often these are mutually exclusive objectives. I have seen businesses move one way and then another, as the competitive environment around them evolves. It can be argued that we are on a significant inflection point in the core/non-core debate currently. Supply chains are being disrupted by climate change, Covid, increasing complexity and the resulting reduction of item invoice price as the determining factor, and the growing awareness of the value of sovereignty.

To find an ‘edge’ opportunity, ask yourself four simple questions, continuously, during the strategy development and review processes:

      • What are the challenges our different types of customers face?
      • What could or should our solution include?
      • Which of our capabilities may be useful elsewhere, and by who?
      • Which of our assets would others value, and why?

You might uncover something surprising that delivers a new lease on life.

The money is not in the list.

The money is not in the list.

 

Every second self-appointed digital marketing guru who offers to help me, making the offer in a mass email, proves the point in the headline.

They have a list, bought from somewhere claiming to have a ‘relationship’ of some sort with me. However, they still manage to spell my name, or that of my business incorrectly, are mistaken about what my business delivers, or make exorbitant claims about what they can do for me. There are many ways to demonstrate they know nothing about me, my business, or the sorts of challenges I face. ‘Spammy’ emailers seem to find them all.

The money is not in the list.

The money is in the message.

Had they delivered an offer to my inbox that might be of interest, I may have read it, and you never know, taken it up. However, being specific requires work, and the tailoring of the message towards the pain points uncovered by that work.

Doing the work means the collection of data, building a profile of the me and my business, presumably falling into the bucket of ‘ideal customer’ for the specific product being sold. They must ensure there is alignment between the problem the product seeks to solve, the pain points being felt, and the communications being sent. Failing in any one of these means the email recipient falls into the 99.9% who make the 0.1% success rate possible.

Again, the money is in the message, not in the list.

Header cartoon credit: Dilbert and Scott Adams. Again. (Sorry, could not resist that one)

 

 

 

3 parameters of successful differentiation

3 parameters of successful differentiation

 

Having a point of differentiation that is sustainable, and sufficiently valuable to customers that they are prepared to pay for it, is marketing’s holy grail.

Everybody seeks differentiation, the challenge is to do it effectively.

It seems to me there are three dimensions:

The first is the product itself, pretty obvious. The benefits that the various product features that add the differentiated value to customers are not easily replicated by competitors.

The second is the means by which you deliver those benefits, which is your business model.

A valuable differentiation is one that competitors cannot or will not replicate without great expense and effort. Some of these evolve out of a significant change in the prevailing business model, such as happened when Amazon started to sell books, but most happen incrementally.

It is relatively easy for a competitor to copy one or two things you do, and usually they will get it pretty right, even 99% right. However, when you do a whole lot of things together, it is harder to copy them all, and even if they do, getting 5 elements of your strategy copied at 99% accuracy, delivers only 95%. Few customers will opt for 95% without a significant discount.

The third is the choices you make that exclude some customers but have an impact on your ability to better service those who remain. This is a strategic choice you make based on the needs of your ideal customer.

Years ago, part of my sales responsibility for my employer at the time was for the regional distributors we used.  Across NSW we had numerous small distributors, most of whom took small amounts of product on each delivery. The logistic costs were often more than the gross margin on the sales, but the sales revenue in total was significant. I took the decision to deliver only in 1/2 pallet lots of any product, and put in a staged discount for increased pallet numbers. After the initial yelling finished, most distributors moved to one of our competitors, along with the margin losses. We were able to increase the levels of support we gave to the remaining larger distributors, and they were able to significantly increase their sales, and our costs dropped accordingly. That segment of distributor customers suddenly became profitable after years of losses.

If you cannot figure out how to differentiate in ways that are meaningful to a cohort of customers, you are destined to be defined by price.

No future in that!

 

 

 

A picture is not worth a thousand words.

A picture is not worth a thousand words.

The old cliché that a picture is worth 1,000 words is disproved again and again, by all the pretty websites and dumb marketing collateral material out there, that is useless.

While pictures have a valuable role in grabbing attention, the real commercial value is delivered by the words that express the value proposition and call to action to the potential customers who turn up.

We are in a competition to gain and keep attention, then to move the reader to a decision. That decision may be that your product deserves a place on the ‘maybe’ list, or to the next point in the sales process. A successful sales process is always moving the potential customer towards the transaction.

Human beings scan their environment, instinctively leveraging their mental frameworks to filter out the stuff that does not matter. Our subconscious organises and filters information, leaving cognitive capacity to deal with the threats and opportunities that emerge. We do not see anything that does not have to do with survival, love, relationships, doing better, some sort of challenge, danger, unless for some reason, it is specifically relevant to us at that moment.

When someone sees our website or collateral material, their brain on autopilot filters out the stuff that is not directly relevant. Somehow, we need to cut through those automatic barriers that exist.

Story is the best way of doing so.

They are the evolved format that can deliver the information that reflects ambition, challenges, a plan to conquer the challenges, unexpected hurdles, and last-minute success. This is the standard format of every story, if you do not use it, or some derivation, the reader will skim over your site and not take in anything at all, effectively not ‘seeing’ it.

Formulas are the assembly of best practise; we use them because they work.

That is why stories work, it is the formula that feeds into the cognitive patterns used by our brains.

The key to a story is clarity. Who is the hero, what he/she must do to win, what happens if he/she does not win, what happens when they do?

What problem do they have, what does the outcome look like when the problem is solved?

Noise kills, the noise from inside and outside our business.

From inside, the clutter we spray around, the ambiguity of what we are saying confuses what others hear.

We need to clarify the message.

How many potential customers go elsewhere because they do not understand how you can help them?

When you need someone to help cut through your clutter, give me a call. It will be a worthwhile investment in clarity.

What multiple of LCM do you need to grow?

What multiple of LCM do you need to grow?

 

LCM: Lifetime Customer Margin.

There is lots of talk, mostly hype, about Lifetime Customer Value. When you look closely, it almost always means lifetime customer revenue.

Revenue is of little commercial value in the absence of margin, so the discussion is somewhat misleading.

Understanding the margin generated by customer segments, or in some cases, individual customers, is an immensely valuable metric. It enables you to focus activities where there is the most benefit to the enterprise.  You can make both strategic and tactical decisions with a great level of confidence based on the margin delivered.

Customer margin is also an enormously useful metric elsewhere.

Salespeople are often rewarded on revenue, which can be gamed. Margin over time is much harder to game, and a far better measure of the effectiveness of a salesperson in delivering value to the enterprise. In any comprehensive key account management process, margin is one of the best measures of the impact of sales and marketing investments made.

Similarly, calculating the cost of acquisition of a customer gains traction when measured against margin rather than revenue.

One of my clients’ businesses relies on referrals as a major source of sales. Increasingly they are moving towards margin on converted referrals as the single metric that best measures the impact of their efforts.

It is proving to be a rewarding strategy.

 

Header credit: Dilbert and his mate Scott Adams.