Are you a day trader or a marketer?

Are you a day trader or a marketer?

It is a paradox to me that we treat investments in capital equipment for our businesses and various financial instruments for our own wealth generation, as items on a balance sheet. By contrast, we treat marketing investments, and particularly those made in various forms of communication, as discretionary items recorded in the profit and loss account as an expense.

Nothing is more critical to the long term commercial health of an enterprise than the investment in marketing. Identifying, communicating, creating transactions and building relationships with customers.

There are 3 basic strategies considered by financial investors

  1. Index investment. This is a low risk strategy, sticking to stocks that reflect the particular index against the performance measures that will be applied. The most usual are the reserve bank interest rates, and the top 200 stocks.
  2. Arbitrage investment. Essentially this is a short term strategy that assumes the investor is smarter than the market. It involves a lot of buying and selling of stocks, essentially bets that the short term is higher or lower than the current. Over the long term, there is plenty of research around that indicates that the performance is around the major stock indices. This is also a high cost strategy, in that the constant trading incurs transaction fees, usually not included in the published performance metrics.
  3. Value investment. Investing for value is a strategy that involves taking a long term view of the businesses in which you invest. This means you engage deeply, not just with the numbers, but with the management and culture, as well as taking a view of the marketplace in which they compete. It is a ‘filtering’ strategy, one where a lot of research boils down the potential targets to a very few, in which you take a significant position. It is a focussing of resources at the specific points where you see there is long term returns available, and are prepared to accept the vagaries of the short term focussed market gyrations.

If you apply a similar frame to the manner in which businesses make investments in marketing, there is a remarkable similarity.

  1. Index marketing. Doing what everyone else is doing, being average, a follower, and risk minimiser. It also ensures you do not stand out from the crowd, which in a cut-throat marketing world means nobody notices or cares about you, so perhaps you should save your money.
  2. Arbitrage marketing.  Those following this strategy are just applying tactical actions to situations they see, there is no underpinning strategy, just advertising and promotion, usually driven by a budget that has to be spent, and KPI’s that measure the activity, not the harder to measure  outcomes of that activity. The driving word is ‘campaign’. A string of tactical activities will be seen as a campaign, and usually there is little flow from one campaign to another. This tendency has been accelerated to stupid proportions by digital, where the cycle time of a campaign, limited as they are, has reduced from months to days. No longer are we looking for the ‘big idea’ that will engage and motivate customers over a long period, we are looking for 10 ideas for the Facebook and Instagram posts in the next 24 hours.
  3. Value marketing. Successful marketing requires a solid strategy, well executed with a long term perspective. Over time, you will fiddle with the details as you become more familiar with the minutiae involved, and you fine tune the application of funds as you learn, but it is a multi-year commitment, not a short campaign, and certainly  not a few ‘cat photos’ on Instagram. Such ‘cat photos’ may be a tiny part of the tactical execution, but are never a component of the strategy. This takes time, resources, and most importantly, a laser focus on what is important to the selected group of primary customers. Over time, you communicate your value proposition that defines why they should do business with you rather than someone else, and do so at a price that delivers you a premium return, while delivering them premium value.  Then you retain their business, increasing your share of wallet, innovating, reducing customer churn, all of which delivers sustainable returns. 

 

If any of the above arguments hold true, then it must be that the measures we use to make decisions about our financial selves should be able to be adapted to the investments we make in marketing.

Step one is to see it as a long term investment in prosperity, and not a short term expense to be reported and forgotten, hidden in a monthly P&L.  

Step two is to have a robust, well thought out, and agile strategy.

Step three is to implement relentlessly.

None of this is easy, there are no templates of any value around that you can just download and apply. The requirement for success is the wisdom that comes with long and deep experience, not some superficial knowledge of the advertising algorithms in Facebook.

 

Header cartoon credit xkcd.com

 

 

The huge benefit of the giant Corona jolt

The huge benefit of the giant Corona jolt

For years I have been a proponent of what is loosely described as ‘Lean thinking’.

In effect it is a continuous process of removing waste by a combination of critical thinking and continuous improvement.

The biggest impediment to a lean process is always the mind set of those who need to change in order to reap the benefits. Change is really hard, especially when the existing state is comfortable. It usually takes a jolt of some sort to gain any sort of traction. There have been times when I have applied that jolt myself, as a means to remove complacency.

However, we are currently in the middle of a giant jolt delivered by the bug, which should have created the greatest potential for lean traction I have seen in many years.

A lean process will progressively remove any activity that does not add value to the end customer, and seek to compress the time it takes to deliver that value.

In other words, if it is essential it stays, non essential, it is on the list to be dumped.

Suddenly we are all looking at the services we saw as  part of life and re-evaluating them with the question: ‘Is that essential, how does it add value?’

We are involuntarily applying a critical eye to everything we do, seeking to identify and line up for removal, anything that is not essential, that is just consuming time and resources for little or no value.

To use lean parlance, the ‘Current state’ as it was pre Corona is recognised as no longer an option, and we are by necessity experimenting with the elements we need to survive commercially. In that process, will seek to understand how the ‘Future state’ might  look. In every case, you can make some assumptions, and apply them as guiding principles to  the things you are considering.

For example, will it be part of the ‘future state’ for office workers to commute, often multiple hours a day, to sit in expensive offices in a CBD to do their work? For the last 20 years, despite the amazing communication tools suddenly available, it has been for most. The dominating management culture, mostly the child of old white guys like me, who substituted a bum in a seat for useful outcomes, said it was so.

This current experiment with remote working has demonstrated the nonsense of this formerly dominating view. We do need however, to substitute the humanity of the casual conversation and social networks built from personal contact.

We can save ourselves a lot of time and money by working from home, partly from home, or perhaps decentralised mini-offices. Reducing commuting time is like reducing machine changeover time: it releases capacity otherwise being wasted. For no cost beyond a change of mindset and perhaps a few modest enabling tools, we can free up huge amounts of potentially productive time.

Ask yourself the Question; ‘how much time per person can  we save by the removal of the necessity to commute’? When you have answered it, ask if there was a better way, for the people concerned, and the stakeholders in your business, to have spent that time.

 

 

Header photo courtesy Dominic Freeman

Have we only ourselves to blame for ‘The Bug?’

Have we only ourselves to blame for ‘The Bug?’

We have a political situation of our own making.

It is very hard to convince people to invest against the possibility of something that may happen at some time in the future. The cost of the investment is immediate and measurable, the benefit unknown, and perhaps some time in the future.

In a democracy it is very hard to get people to vote for something they cannot see and feel, immediately. We moan, and I am a chief moaner, about the lack of foresight and planning evident, that has enabled the bug to run riot through our economies, but do we only have ourselves to blame?

There are three types of actions that can be taken by any organisation, public or otherwise.

  1. Reactive. These are decisions and actions taken after an event.
  2. Responsive. Actions and decisions taken as events are unfolding
  3. Pre-emptive. Actions and decisions taken in anticipation of an event designed to mitigate the impact.

If we were to categorise the performance of our various governments over the past 12 months, I would say that in relation to the fires that started in September last year, they were reactive, and even that is being very kind. The floods, now almost forgotten in February, the response was again reactionary, and sadly lacking substance. In relation to the Corona bug, they seem to have done better and been responsive, taking decisive action as events unfolded, and being prepared to adjust the response as more data becomes available.

Coming out of this, I would like to see some sort of pre-emptive actions taken to mitigate the impacts of the next catastrophe, whether it be another bug, fire, flood, or financial meltdown. As a country we have to build our operational resilience, meaning the ability to invest so that the impacts do not drown us.

Do this, and we will be a much stronger nation. Alas, in a democracy this is really hard, as it requires a collective desire to invest now without any idea of the outcome or payback, and electorates are not good at this.

This difference neatly explains the quick and substantial reaction to the current Corona crisis, but our almost total of lack planning and investment to mitigate the impact of climate change.

The current idea of a location app on our phones is a great example of the dilemma we face.

It makes absolute sense that we are able to track the movements of people in the face of a highly infectious disease, to see with whom they interact, even by chance, so that we can throw a ring fence around the bug. Most would probably agree,  but the downside is that we do not trust the politicians and ‘forces of evil’ to turn the thing off, and leave it off, when the crisis is over, thereby impinging on our rights to privacy.

In a democracy, like , this will probably mean a very good idea is thrown away. However, I bet that in a different system, it would be embraced, as public sentiment would not matter, and is kept private anyway as a means to stay out of the spotlight, which can be a dangerous place to be.

 

Header cartoon: courtesy David Rowe, AFR.

 

 

Ask yourself the hardest question: Today!

Ask yourself the hardest question: Today!

A question I always ask my clients at some point in an improvement initiative is: “what would a VC firm do if they took over management today?

It always leads to deep and challenging conversations, that lead to a recognition of things happening, or indeed, not happening, in a business that is delivering sub optimal outcomes.

Waste from many sources, such as rework and excess inventory, fragmented internal processes, friction for customers, sub optimal performance of machinery, functional misalignment, missed opportunities, and many others.

Approaching the identification of problem areas as a third party might, allows people to open up and be constructively critical of the status quo, and envision what changes should be made. 

 Being as we are in the middle of a crisis, you no longer need to envisage what a VC might do in the event they turned up to rape and pillage the business, it is happening around you by ‘The Bug’.

There has never been a better time, except last year, to ask yourself the question.

Second best time is right now.

When you have some of the answers, do  not waste any time implementing. The state of your cash reserves and sales pipeline will dictate the urgency of action, and some may, with the benefit of the hindsight you do not yet have, not be the absolute best option.

However, doing nothing is not an option, so get on with it and implement. 

 

How to insulate your business from the inevitable recession

How to insulate your business from the inevitable recession

 

The inevitability of a bad deterioration in the economy is now absolute. No more fluffing around with nice, reassuring words, the  consequences of this Corona pandemic will be an economic and social clusterf**k.

So, in these circumstances, how do you insulate your business from the effect, and even make some competitive and strategic headway?

Five things I have learned over my 45 years in business, the last 25 of them helping SME’s improve, and from time to time, survive, often in adverse circumstances. Over the course of that 45 years, I have lived through a number of events that caused significant distress at the time, and resulted in massive changes to the way we live and work. However, none I suspect will be as cataclysmic as this current crisis. Nevertheless, the lessons from the past can be applied to the present, so long as we do so recognising they will not be just copies, they will have their own characteristics, and some nasty traps for the unwary. 

 

Have a strong balance sheet.

This means having cash reserves. In tough times, nothing is as valuable as cash, it delivers flexibility and options, without which you are at the mercy of others. In days of low interest rates as we have, many have been seduced by the siren song of leverage. It is the ‘ make your assets work harder‘ pitch of those in the financial leverage game. Leverage however, works both ways, and in a downturn, accelerates the rate at which you go broke.

If you are leveraged, deleverage as hard and fast as possible, and hoard your cash.

 

Have a plan

While plans are made to be broken, at least you are able to track where the divergence happens, figure out why, and how to do it better next time. Planning effectively requires that you have a common strategic objective, broken down into ‘nested’ tactical objectives. This cascading of objectives ensures that priorities are clear, that the required resources and capabilities are delivered to the points they are needed to achieve the objectives, and deliver the best return.

 

Have a spring clean

Every enterprise carries the imprint of its past, often deeply buried. Many should be jettisoned  during the bad times, when it is easier, which has the effect of delivering a leaner more responsive enterprise as things improve. Apply the Pareto principal to everything you have and do: customers, processes, product lines, employees, inventories, fixed assets,  and suppliers. Clean out the ones that do not deliver value in excess of cost, and that are inconsistent with the more focussed strategy you will have developed. Hidden deep in most businesses are transaction costs, which are almost always a source of significant cost reductions  and ‘no-cost’ capacity increases. Eliminating the friction that generates these costs, will save time and money, deliver ‘no added cost’ capacity, and make customers very happy.

A question I ask my clients at some point is: ‘What would a VC do if they bought this business? Everyone understands a VC investment is always on the basis of a fast profit. Invest, optimise, sell. The question and subsequent conversation focusses the mind on what actually generates the value customers are prepared to pay for. Sometimes there are regulatory costs, and there will be a core of necessary cost that enables operations, but the rest is on the block. 

 

Focus on getting money in, not just cutting costs

Cost cutting is the reflexive response to a cash crisis, and short term it works, but not in the longer term. To use a sporting analogy, you cannot win a game by being defensive, the very best you can do is have a draw. Having a draw in these circumstances means you go down the gurgler with all  the others. No, you have to find a way to expand, get new money in the door.

 

Let the inmates run the asylum.

Post this Corona crisis, the world will not just go back to the way it was. Many of the changes necessary to beat this thing will be baked into the way we interact with each other. Work and the expectations of our institutions will be forever altered. Setting out to manage these changed dynamics without the appropriate level of change in management processes and behaviour will lead to inevitable failure. Following are a few thoughts on the pivotal changes necessary

  • Remote work. The most obvious is that we will all be more attuned to working remotely. While it was an increasing trend prior to the bug, it has become a tsunami in the past few weeks and it will not go into reverse. Therefore, the management  task is how to harness and leverage the capabilities of a remote workforce. Most senior managers are of the vintage that did  not grow up with digital as an automatic and natural part of their lives, and for many this is a scary prospect. Most have accommodated the digital revolution in some way, but the institutional cultural barriers that remain in their hands, need to be dismembered.  
  • KPI’s need to be set on outcomes, not activity. No longer will presence at a desk, and seemingly adequate levels of activity be enough, it is the outcomes that will dominate. This change requires a whole rethink of the manner in which performance is measured in most organisations.
  • Management behaviour has to change. The best leaders and managers BB (Before Bug) spent a significant part of their time ‘walking around’, and communicating face to face. Time spent understanding the problems and opportunities for individuals, and groups of individuals at every level paid dividends. This face to face, personal interaction will no longer be practical. Leaders need to develop processes that deliver that sense of personal interaction to employees and contractors operating remotely. This means they have to have in place systems that deliver emotional security and stability while focussing individual and group effort on achieving a common goal.
  • Transparency creates accountability. Instinctively, we all know this, but for so long, information has provided power, so it has become the default to hang onto it. No longer will this be the case. Leaders will create accountability by being transparent themselves, and forcing that transparency through the organisation structures to the lowest levels. This change will be very uncomfortable for many, and will lead to a wholesale turnover in older managers who simply cannot make the changes necessary. This will lead to a social challenge for us all. However, those managers will be replaced by younger ones who are more attuned to accountability based on outcomes rather than presence. All those who have not read Ray Dalio’s book ‘Principles’, should use this downtime to do so. It lays out a comprehensive and compelling argument for what Dalio calls ‘radical transparency’. This will become, I think, the emerging  default.
  • Communicate, communicate, communicate. The options for communication have exploded, in the post bug world leaders will be using all of them, continuously. The communication is an essential ingredient in the mix of creating transparency, accountability, and focus on a common objective. It will require entirely new processes and habits to be developed, replacing old ones, and a radical reordering of the priorities of many managers.
  • Creativity will flourish, if you let it. Crises always lead to creative solutions to existing problems, and innovation to create opportunities in areas not previously recognised. The two world wars last century led to an explosion of technology, Microsoft was launched during the 1970’s oil crisis, the iPod launched in the aftermath of the dot com bust, and the 2008 meltdown led to Uber and Airbnb. All of these were spawned outside any corporate boundaries, except perhaps the iPod, but Apple was as good as broke at the time, so had little to lose. 

When you need the wisdom of having lived through it all before, and learnt from the experience, give me a call.

 

 

The silver in the corona cloud

The silver in the corona cloud

As we hesitantly, with stumbles, come out of this lockdown, we will see the landscape has changed. For some, it will be a land of opportunity, for others, a wasteland.

Rather than seeing it as a calamity, those who choose to see it as an opportunity, will be able to look and see that what has actually happened is that the lockdown has dramatically accelerated many trends that were already slowly impacting on our lives. They were all evident before to those who were looking, now they are in ample evidence to everyone who is not completely blind.

The more obvious ones, are:

‘Digitisation’.

So called digitisation has taken off, whatever digitisation means in your context. Suddenly ‘digital’ is the new normal. From remote control of factories to grannies interacting with their grandchildren via Zoom, nobody has been immune.

Remote work

Working from home, cafes, the car, has been developing for a decade. Suddenly, it has been accepted as an alternative to expensive office space in central locations. What will probably evolve is some combination of decentralised ‘meeting places’ and working from home, serviced offices, and cafes. The trend has been pushed along a decade in 5 months.

Retail delivery services.

Similarly, delivery services have been pushed ahead a decade. Everything from the local restaurant to the supermarket, and department store now must be geared up to deliver or lose the sale. This will change the nature of retail from transactional to more ‘showrooming’, a trend harnessed by Apple a decade ago while everyone else was cutting retail prices and locations to save money.

The end of ‘purpose’ marketing.

The focus of marketing, at least by corporate marketers, will have pivoted from the banality of the ‘purpose driven’ marketing of the last few years. In the absence of a compelling idea, marketers deluded themselves that people really cared about their empty statements of ‘purpose’. Your potential and current customers will be demanding evidence that the statements carry weight in the behaviour of those seeking their money.

Politics.

Politicians have had a huge wakeup call. We voters really hate the division and spite of the practise of politics as usual pre corona. We long for some evidence that those elected to lead, do so, rather than just taking the trappings of office for their own benefits. The pressures on politicians and the political orthodoxy that has dominated to date will have to be revised. The basic assumptions about what services government provides, and from who and how, the necessary funds are raised to pay for them, have moved.

Not since 1939 have our politicians been confronted with the profoundly difficult choices that now face. I wonder if they are up to the challenge?

The economy.

The economy has suffered a major stroke, one for which substantial rehab over a long period will be required. It would be naive to believe it will recover to look much like the pre stroke version, but recover it will, over time. For those willing and able to push the boundaries, there will be opportunity everywhere, from the remaking of supply chains, to the potential of rebirth of sophisticated niche manufacturing, and new export markets.  Digitisation of just about everything that has been accelerated massively, will demand investment and different business models and enterprise capabilities. These will offer great opportunity as well as what for many will be a terminal challenge. None of this will be easy, but it will happen.

As we ‘wake up’ from the corona coma, there will be an inclination to revert to the known, and comfortable. Succumbing to that urge will be a mistake, as we have all been forced to move on, to push the edges of our comfort zones. The economic and social climate has changed dramatically, and those that seek the comfort of the Pre-Corona status quo will find themselves isolated and falling behind their competitors.

Picking your way through all this will take effort, experience, and careful planning. When you need the injection of those skills, give me a call.