Jul 21, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Strategy
Yesterday Telstra, Australia’s largest, formerly monopoly Telco announced that they would put a $2.20 administration fee on all payments made in person.
Even for Telstra, who have over the years dug up creative ways to convince their customers to go elsewhere, this is a coup.
Have the accountants finally taken over the madhouse? Is there anybody in marketing home (or are they all out to lunch with the ad agency?) Even if they are actually just catching up to the usurious practices of several of their competitors, the opportunity to spotlight the raping of their retail customers pockets has not been missed.
We all know that in-person service is more expensive than electronic, it is also a pretty good way for a business to connect with and understand its customers, but that is clearly of no value to Telstra who apparently know all there is to know about marketing and their customers.
Pity about the shareholders who have seen an impressive erosion of the value of their shareholdings, even before the impact of the WFC is taken into account. Is there a connection here?
So to the award, a new category, recognizing excellence in marketing stupidity, the “Twit Of The Year Award” (TOTYA) has been created to recognize Telstra’s excellence in pissing off customers. A stellar performance this year, on top of the continual failure of their bigpond servers to work reliably, a hefty premium sought for mobile internet connection, and just a general “get stuffed” attitude displayed to just about everybody throughout the year. Well done Telstra, a super performance!
Jul 21, 2009 | Demand chains, Management, Marketing, Operations, Sales
How long will it take for the politicians in this country to forge an acceptable compromise amongst all the interests in the carbon debate, and take meaningful action.? Probably forever, and we will end up with the proverbial camel after all the compromise, and that will suit nobody.
Enter the game-changer!
Wal-Mart, the biggest retailer in the world by far, turning over more than $US450 billion, more than most countries, has changed the game. Last week, they announced they would put carbon footprint information on display labels for all products sold in their stores. Suppliers will be required to assemble the information from their supply chains as part of their trading relationship with Wal-Mart
No recommendations, just the information, and consumers can make up their own minds.
The implications are mind-boggling.
In one decision, by one company, the nature of the debate about climate change has been turned from one seeking a political, emotional and academic compromise to a very simple choice for the Wal-Mart supply chains, do it or face deletion from their largest customer. Multi-national suppliers, Colgate, P&G, Unilever, Mars, and many others, will suddenly have another marketing lever to use in their marketing activities, across the world. Suddenly, weasel words in media grabs from pollies are even less meaningful than they usually are.
In Australia, Woolworths follow closely the steps taken by Wal-Mart, and what better way to put added pressure on its arch-rival Coles.
Suppliers to Woolies had better get ready!
Jul 19, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Sales, Strategy
On the surface, these appear to be the same coin, different sides, albeit three sides?.
Not so in business.
Foresight is often little more accurate than the musings of the gypsy at the local fair, whereas hindsight is capable of being 100% accurate.
Modelling has become the commercial equivalent of the crystal ball, offering the capacity to predict the future, but relies on the assumptions accurate in the past (seen with the benefit of hindsight) being consistent into the future, usually better than rubbing the crystal, but often not much.
Software has given us the false sense of security that comes with reams of paper with numbers all over it, and we often forego the benefit of experience, wisdom, and plain common sense, lured by the sirens song of the “certainty” generated by the numbers .
Bring back the value of common sense, and suspicion of anything that smacks of certainty when predicting the future, and we will all make better decisions.
Jul 16, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Sales, Strategy
Planning for your business takes up a lot of time and resource, which is often hard to allocate, particularly in small businesses.
It is a bit like the planning that goes into your daughters wedding, many things seem trivial at the time, but when it goes right on the day, aren’t you glad you did it?
Think about the cost (to your sanity and peace of mind) of stuffing up the flowers, or the cars on the day, and consider the relative value of a bit more planning.
Many small businesses do not spend the time planning, they are so busy getting stuff done that the time is not easily available. Often when they think about it, much of the activity that takes all the time is fixing things that have gone wrong, or take more time than necessary, that could have been mitigated by a bit of planning.
You plan your daughters wedding to the last detail, shouldn’t you do the same for your business?.
Jul 16, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Strategy
The notion of an organized, planned, tidy strategy development and implementation process, whether it be for a multinational, or a small local business is profoundly flawed by the simple fact that it requires forecasting accurately a number of things, including many beyond the control and understanding of any business, and the only thing we know for sure about forecasts is that they will be wrong.
Strategy development and implementation is an organic process, filled with false starts, blind alleys, and pain, all of which add to the evolutionary “learning” process, which sometimes delivers commercial sustainability.
To be useful strategy implementation must have the capacity to “learn” , to see the impact of its actions, and adjust to accommodate changes, misunderstandings, and opportunities.
Most SME’s do not think much about strategy, they are usually tactical in outlook, and that is a failing. Strategy is as important to a small business selling through “alternative” channels, as it is to the multinationals selling through established channels.
Only with hindsight is strategy implementation an orderly process, when all the speed humps can be ignored or explained away
Jul 9, 2009 | Management, Operations, Sales, Strategy
Selling is a tough job, and getting tougher, as the number of ways a potential customer can purchase expand with the web, and consumer confidence is fragile, despite the stunning Australian figures a couple of days ago.
No longer can sales people fulfill their budgets by being accurate and sympathetic purveyors of information, and doing a lot of calls, they now need to be able to add value in ways that competitors and no other channels can duplicate at the price.
How do you do this?
- Have only skilled sales people, ones who without thinking, empathize with customers and their problems. Make sure they know your products intimately, and the business of the customers as intimately so they can identify unique ways your products can add value to the customer.
- Have in place the sales support mechanisms so that every opportunity identified is optimized. Sales people make sales talking to customers, not chasing late orders through your systems.
- Have a “sales culture” where the whole organisation recognises that customers are the reason they are in business, and it is everyone’s job to sell, not just those with a bag.
The bad news for sales professionals is that there will be less of you as time goes on, the good news for those left is that they will be paid a lot more than they are now as their value is recognized.
