May 1, 2013 | Communication, Innovation, Social Media
20 years ago yesterday, April 30 1993, CERN, the European Organisation for Nuclear research, the developer of what has become the W.W.W. announced that they would open it up, making it free to all by posting the codes on what became the worlds first website.
A computer based communication system had existed since 1985, when the first “domain” name had been registered, but it was the private property of individual universities and research organisations.
To my mind, this single action by CERN management in 1993 was the catalyst for the revolution we have undergone in the last 20 years, and which is still continuing, and this revolution (I am looking for a stronger word than just “revolution”) is at least as significant as the realisation that steam could be used to drive machines, and you could set up a system to mass produce the printed word.
In a number of TED talks over the years, there has been some extraordinary contributions to our understanding of the impact this decision has had.
Clay Shirky has mused about the brainpower released, the cogitative surplus, by the web, Kevin Kelly makes observations and predictions about the development of the web, and Ray Kurzweil wonders at the continuously accelerating pace of innovation that is occurring. All have made the point that the world has changed.
Tim Berners-Lee, now Sir Tim, was the man. He wrote the protocols that underpin the web HTML, et al, while working as a software engineer at CERN. The project was a part time indulgence, a side project, but then it went public.
To my mind, this is almost equivalent to the Big Bang, the day the world started, anew.
Apr 30, 2013 | Branding, Communication, Social Media
You can no longer win by shouting, there is always someone who can should louder, longer, and more effectively.
You win today by being genuinely useful.
Those on the receiving end will tell others, who will tell others, and so it goes.
My kids call it social media marketing, I call it common sense marketing.
Apr 26, 2013 | Communication, Customers, Marketing, Sales, Small business
The most powerful way to get someone to agree with your idea is to ask them the leading question, and have them tell you.
Ronald Regan used this technique a lot. He did not tell the American people “your economic situation has deteriorated over the last 48 months”, instead he asked the famous question during his election campaign: “Are you better off now than you were 4 years ago?”. The answer was a resounding “NO” and he was elected.
Asking the right question can prompt a favourable, almost pre-deternmined response, but the formulation of the words to convey that response provokes a deeper, more intensive processing of the question. This leaves less room for ambiguity and uncertainty in the way the receiver responds to the question, and considerable committment to the answer.
I have also found it a great way to generate engagement at the opening of a presentation.
Apr 23, 2013 | Communication, Small business
Samuel Clemens (Mark Twain) famously said “I do not have time to write you a short letter, so I have written you a long one”.
This statement is a pitch for twitter 100 years before it was conceived, as the sentiment of clarity through brevity is the same. Writing to convey an idea is a challenge, writing to convey an idea in a few words requires a discipline of thought that can be extremely hard.
The restriction of Twitter to 140 characters does seem to encourage a written shorthand that I find excruciating, but at its best, also adds a discipline to constructing an idea that squeezes out the superfluous, the hyperbole, the distractions, and forces clarity by brevity.
It seems that the “Twitter Pitch” is replacing the “Elevator Pitch” first made popular by Dale Carnegie, but the idea is the same.
Apr 19, 2013 | Branding, Marketing, Strategy
Ever noticed that people who seem to “really have it all together” are able to poke fun at themselves, take negative feedback as an opportunity to learn and improve, and surprise with their capacity to be absolutely, selflessly, honest?
It is often the same with brands, another example of the similarity of people and brands, of how brands take on human characteristics.
However, it is a revelation to see this astonishingly honest ad by Coke.
Is this the beginning of a trend, a measure of maturity of the Coca Cola brand that it is able to spend resources advertising the downside of consumption of the product, or just a mistake, like the appalling blunder with “New Coke” in 1985. Perhaps, my cynical side asks, it is because they make more money out of their other beverage products, and want to switch consumption?
It seems to me that despite all, it really is just a measure of the security that Coke management feels in the strength of their brand. It is a recognition that if they do not talk about the cause and effect between sugar beverage consumption and obesity, and all its problems, others will, and they better have a credibility and a stake in the conversation.
Apr 18, 2013 | Branding, Communication
![additionalparking[1]](https://i0.wp.com/www.strategyaudit.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/additionalparking1.jpg?resize=159%2C300&ssl=1)
In a world of homogenisation, being different is both dangerous and necessary.
Standing for something of value is absolutely essential, ambiguity is death.
![additionalparking[1]](https://i0.wp.com/www.strategyaudit.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/additionalparking1.jpg?ssl=1)