Forensic marketing

    Yarning to an old mate last week, the usual wide ranging stuff you examine with someone you know well, he said “you know, what you do is forensic marketing, exhuming the deeply held assumptions that distort the outcomes, simplifying  the jargon, identifying the make-work activity, seeing with a fresh eye the alignment of priorities” 

    It struck me as a very useful description, so I constructed a simple list of the starting points:

  1. Who are your customers?
  2. Why are they your customers?
  3. What do they buy?
  4. How much could they buy?
  5. What do various customers have in common?
  6. Why do they buy from you, and not your competitor?
  7. How much & what do they buy from your competitor?
  8. How do you define their Wallet?
  9. Is it the same as they would define it?
  10. What keeps your customers, your competitors, and you awake at night?
  11. Which customers have you lost, and why?
  12. What would you have to do to get them back, and is it worth the cost?
  13. If you were seeking to enter your market now, how would you do it?
  14. What are the barriers to better performance of your products?
  15. What are the markets where your capabilities rather than just your products have relevance?
  16. How do you communicate with customers?
  17. How do they communicate with you, and what is the quality of that communication?
  18. How engaged are you with your key (not necessarily biggest) customers?
  19. Where are the markets that have evolved  that use different versions of your key pieces of capability?
  20. What can you learn from them?
  21. How do the demand chains work?
  22. Where in the chain does the real leverage reside?
  23. Where are the sources of waste in the chain?
  24. How do you innovate to eliminate them?
  25. How can you turn those who inhabit your demand chain into collaborators?
  26. What are the key competitive capabilities of your competitors?
  27. How do competitors react to the tactics you employ?
  28. How effective are their reactions?
  29. How has their response fed into your planning?
  30.  

    Once I started the list, I found it just went on, and on, and on, pages of it.

    What changes is the way elements interact, apply differently to different situations, and the means by which experience, deep sector knowledge, and the wisdom that comes from hard lessons steers you towards a smaller range of drivers that warrant deeper analysis in any given situation.

    A review of marketing, that can be best described as “forensic” can deliver real benefits from the insights that evolve.

     

     

     

     

Canute sees the light.

Guvera, an Australian start-up,  has evolved a business model that is a bold but necessary experiment for the music industry.

Music downloads from the site will be free, paid for by advertisers who get the opportunity to connect with consumers of particular songs, or music genres. This has some very attractive possibilities for marketers of a wide range of products.

Seems a way better solution to the piracy travails of the music industry than their reaction to date which has been modeled on King Canute’s  control of the tides.

Common sense, not so common.

 

Sometimes academic research evolves to support what common sense has told us for years.

A standard phrase in the marketing lexicon is “look at it from the customers perspective” an obvious and logical strategy, not often used for a range of reasons, largely associated with the manner in which firms organise and conduct their operational, strategy development and governance processes, but largely driven by common sense and experience.

Now there is research, and books coming that supports the notion of the “outside in” company. At last, common sense appears to be making a formal appearance.

Fail to succeed.

It is often said, in one way or another, that the key to success is a willingness to fail, because only by taking risks, not accepting the common wisdom or status quo can you be sufficiently different to be have the chance tosucceed.

J.K.Rowling is possibly the most successful author of the last 50 years, not only on her own behalf, but her creation Harry Potter, spawned a whole new genre of stories, and yet,  she was for a long time a “failure”

Now she is sharing her experience with Harvard graduates, usually associated with extravagant success in a commencement speech, not to be missed.

 

 

Marketing punishment

For fifty years, good marketing meant efficient use of advertising funds, driving distribution, segmenting markets, usually on socio-economic status and usage patterns, development of brand awareness and purchase intention,  a flow of range extensions, and staying out of trouble.

The last 10 years have seen a sea change, and none of the above really counts any more, because everyone knows how to do it, marketing has become commoditised, and being just as able at “marketing” as everyone else leads to punishment in the market.

What is needed now are genuine insights, new connections, stuff that cannot be copied, customers who are advocates of your brand, and true creativity, not just another colour.

Lip service has been given for many years to the concept of “Customer Value Proposition”, but it was in the context of mass marketing, and mass markets where it evolved. The concept is still valid, it is just far more difficult to execute, as it needs to be applied many times to market segments, often approaching one customer only.

Failure to recognise the new individual focus of marketing, and reacting by enabling a conversation between yourself and your customers, will lead to punishment in the marketplace by way of increasing irrelevance.

 

Where do we find the time?

From time to time we stumble across something that offers a “Eureka moment” an opportunity for insight that clears the haze, explains something in a way that makes such obvious sense, we wonder why it took so long.

Clay Shirky’s notion of “Cognitive surplus” is such a moment.

His central thesis is that we spend time, huge amounts of it, consuming various forms of media, and he concentrates on TV, but surely most magazines rate a mention, because we do not know what else to do with the surplus time, but when we wake up, and find an alternative, we embrace it, enter Wikipedia, open source software, facebook, and many more.

The wake-up is that we realise that rather than being passive receivers of stuff, we can create something ourselves using the tools of the web, and no matter how trivial it may be, it is more rewarding than sitting watching Desperate Housewives. This is a seismic shift in the way we live our lives, and our kids are going to have to deal with it, but what fun that will be, and how enriching it will be for their lives, so much better than dumbing out in front of Gilligans Island.