Oct 21, 2009 | Management, Sales, Small business
It is pretty obvious, although not always acted on that you should define the problem before you spend time trying to sell a solution.
There are many techniques to getting to the point where the sale can be made, libraries have been written, but in my experience, 3 simple questions will get you there. They are not easy to answer, but once you have, a sale is the easy bit.
- How can you help your prospect build sales?
- How can you help your prospect to decrease costs?
- How can you help your prospect to increase productivity?
Answer these, and you have the problem your product can solve defined, and the sell is easy, after all, who can say no to any of these being delivered. One of the rules I use, never go into a sales situation (as distinct from an information gathering situation) without at least 2 of these answered in some form.
Oct 19, 2009 | Management, OE, Operations, Sales
Talking to a client last week about his S&OP processes, (or lack of them despite the software) I realised that we were both using English, but were talking a different language. This is often a challenge in S&OP implementations, and even amongst those who have successfully implemented in different businesses, as a local jargon usually emerges to accommodate the vagaries particular to the organisation, product type, and culture.
Following is a simplified list I gave to him as a basis from which the conversations could be translated, in the common order of S&OP preparation.
- Demand planning. A compilation of data (past sales, orders received & delivered, orders received and undelivered) and qualitative data from the marketplace (competitive activity, accounts won & lost, distribution changes, seasonal influence, and so on). This is not a forecast of what will be sold, it is a quantification of the influences on demand. This data is assembled in a huge variety of ways, often collated by the “Master Scheduler”, but not ideally to avoid capacity bias emerging too early, and the sales/customer management function, and operations management.
- Forecasts. A suite of forecasts for product families rolled into a consensus outlook based on the output of the demand planning process. At this stage it is unconstrained by questions of capacity & input availability. This is usually a specific role held by an individual, often titled “Master Scheduler” and is an ongoing responsibility, but signed off weekly for submission to the Capacity & planning meeting.
- Capacity & supply planning meeting, normally weekly. Puts the acid test of reality on the sales forecasts by adding the capacity and input availability constraints. The output is the daily/weekly production schedule to be executed based on the requirements and trade-offs/compromises that emerge from the more senior SOP processes.
- Pre-SOP. A meeting (normally bi-weekly) of the implementation level of management that makes the trade-offs and decisions that emerge from the Pre-SOP, ready for implementation, and identifies strategic resource allocation issues for resolution. This is the key meeting, and provides input to the senior S&OP meetings, and the capacity & supply planning meetings
- S&OP sign-off by senior management, normally monthly. Over time in successful implementations this becomes a rubber stamp on most occasions, but it retains the control of major decisions that need to be made that have more of a long term and capital utilisation impact than is available to the Pre-SOP management level. Things like new equipment, outsourcing, choices between major customers, contractual compliance, shift additions, and so on are usually signed off at this level.
Oct 12, 2009 | Management, Sales
Selling is all about finding the way your product can add value to your prospective customer greater than the price you are asking for it.
Why is it then that most selling activities I see are the commercial equivalent of “flashing” your wares and hoping the” flashee” is interested in buying?
Surely asking questions is a better way to find out what they may have a need for, often unrecognised until you are able to demonstrate the value of your solution.
So, ask questions, keep them open ended, focus on benefits delivered by your product, not on their features, and discuss them in the context of the prospects environment, which you define by questions.
Looking at a sales pitch as a negotiation, rather than simply a selling exercise can assist the process of questioning, identifying the other parties “buttons” is a part of the game, and the way to do that is with questions.
Still the best sales book ever written is “Spin Selling” by Neil Rackham, and this focuses on the process of questioning a prospect, leading to a sale.
It works.
Sep 3, 2009 | Leadership, Management, Sales
Negotiation is a daily activity of most managers, almost irrespective of the size of the organisation, and the industry it sits in. On many occasions, a conversation may not be seen as negotiation, as it lacks the adversarial background that highlights a negotiation in progress, but if the conversation has an objective, it has in its nature some elements of a negotiation.
This was highlighted recently in a conversation with a client preparing for a friendly merger, where the outcome had been agreed in principal, all that was left was the “how to” bits, so below is a list I developed for that conversation, in no particular order.
- Any conversation that seeks an arrangement where both parties believe they have done better than their “walk away” point is a negotiation, recognise it when it happens.
- Failure to neglect or understand the other sides priorities and what drives them to participate in a conversation that is really a negotiation is a fundamental one.
- Do not let price hide the other factors that contribute to a successful outcome, particularly the emotional and psychological ingredients. A negotiation is a “climax” moment in a relationship, if there has been no work on the relationship, it follows that the climax will be sub-optimal.
- Allowing established positions to get in the way of sensible and creative compromise that serves the best interests of both parties is a common mistake.
- Early in the process of determining the nature of the negotiation, establish your BATNA (best alternative to a negotiated agreement)
- Processing information that emerges during a negotiation purely from the perspective of your inherent bias can prove to be fatal to achieving any outcome.
Aug 24, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Sales
At an industry round table a short time ago, a general conversation was bouncing around amongst a bunch of relatively senior executives about the uses their businesses had made of the internet as a marketing and communication tool.
Few were vocal advocates of the web, several had examples of fancy programs that yielded little for their businesses.
It became clear after a while that they largely saw the net as a way of avoiding the mailing costs, printing, envelope stuffing, and stamps, associated with “direct mail” and were grateful, but it did not work very well.
Memo:
The net is not just free stamps, it is a whole new way of engaging your market, of attracting and engaging a new bunch of people, probably who were never going to be on a mailing list, because they engage each other, they network with like minded people. The power is taken from you, and given to them.
Seeing this as a version of a snail mail direct mail program is really missing the point completely. The net is nothing like a free mailing service, it is a new way of working with your “tribe” rather than directing them.
Aug 19, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Sales
What happens when you meet someone…? “where do you work” is a common conversation starter.
Someone who responds enthusiastically, extolling the virtues of their employer and the products they produce, will have a positive impact on those they meet, and the “word of mouth” that originates with that conversation can be substantial.
Conversely, an employee who expresses no confidence in their employer and products will create a negative impact, which has the potential to multiply with the telling, and after all, who is in a better position to know the real quality of a product than one who participates in the production process?
Thinking about employee satisfaction in this way puts a new perspective onto now almost standard annual employee satisfaction survey.
Customers are cautious, advertising savvy, and cynical, so getting a message to them is very difficult.
In a networked world, it now requires measures to develop employees as advocates for your business, as the advocacy of one person will have more impact than a 1000 TARP points in a TV advertising schedule.
