Dec 7, 2009 | Management, Strategy
Currently I am involved in a portfolio management exercise that covers brands, products, and projects on the books for a modest sized but rapidly growing business. A pretty standard exercise that most thoughtful businesses go through on a regular basis as a part of their strategic processes.
However, it occurred to me that the information, and mindset we were using reflected either an internal view of the piece we were looking at, often driven by what had worked in the past, or by industry trend data, that again, reflected an extrapolation of what had happened in the past, the underlying assumption that the past would repeat itself.
We know that the old saying “those who do not understand the past are destined to repeat it” is true, but what of the flip side, deliberately ignoring the past, to envision the possibilities, and using that to inform your portfolio management decisions.
We tried it, and whilst the process is incomplete, it is certain that the outcome has been altered substantially to what it may have been. We have also concluded that looking from the outside in should be a discipline we impose on ourselves, as that is how the markets, competitors, and innovative insights that can be very “left field” will look at us.
Nov 26, 2009 | Management, Marketing, Small business, Strategy
Small businesses often do not spend the time to develop strategy, agreeing priorities, developing a point of difference, and a plan to execute in the marketplace, and as a result find themselves running harder and harder just to keep up.
Developing a Value Proposition to a defined group of customers is as important to a small business as it is to a large one, perhaps more so as an SME does not normally have the resources to waste on efforts that do offer a return, and they generally have less “fat” in the system to absorb mistakes.
Time spent planning up front always pays dividends in time and resource expenditure down the track.
Nov 23, 2009 | Innovation, Marketing, Strategy
The evolution of the commercial and legal frameworks within which we live has left us with the notion of the firm as a legal entity, responsible for its debts, its own destiny, and to its owners for a return on the capital risked to fund activities.
In all those capacities, a firm is like a person, but unlike a person, who has an existence as a result of its parents, a firm does not live in the abstract without a value proposition to customers.
Firms grow and prosper only while their products are in some way superior to those of their competitors, and when the products become stale, so do their prospects of success.
This simple fact of life should drive the innovation efforts in all businesses. As the guru Peter Drucker once said, “the only competitive advantage that is sustainable is the ability to out-innovate competitors”
Nov 8, 2009 | Leadership, Management, Strategy
Various expressions of the basis for an organsations existence, Vision, Mission, Purpose, and others, all have different meanings, and certainly different meanings to different people, and have all been misused for years.
Some time ago running an agricultural industry workshop, very early in the proceedings, a bloke down the back piped up & said ” If I have to hear another vision, or mission, I will puke”(or words to that effect). Stopped the conversation cold for a bit, but the comment reflected the simple fact that these expressions have become clichés.
Having an unambiguous expression of why you are here, and the purpose of the business, gives a context to decisions all stake holders make about what they can expect, what is important and why, and what they have to learn, and do better, or more of. It provides a connection between all of the competing agendas and priorities with the simple question: “how will this assist to achieve the purpose of the business?”
Answering that apparently simple question ” why are we here” can be very difficult, but it is worth the effort.
Nov 5, 2009 | Demand chains, Leadership, Strategy
Suddenly, post GFC, transparency has become a buzz-word.
Regulators are calling for “transparency” in financial products, shareholders (and regulators supposedly on their behalf) are calling for “transparency” in executive remuneration schemes, and so on.
Those of us who have been building demand chains know that transparency is a fundamental building block, not because it is just a feel good, but because it reduces transaction costs, exposed arbitrage profits, and enables the needs of the end customer to be the driver in the chain.
From the noise coming from newly enthused regulators, you would think they have discovered something new, rather than just catching up with the practices of a small but growing part of the commercial community that has recognised the contribution transparency can make to their economic and competitive sustainability.
Oct 29, 2009 | Branding, Marketing, Strategy
Politicians on both sides of Australian politics are calling for a “narrative” to describe the values that the electorate should hold dear, particularly advocating a set of values that happen to be consistent with theirs, and their particular brand of politics.
What they appear to mean is that their political “brand” has run out of petrol, and they need something to give it some substance, now!.
Unfortunately, they do not understand that a brand is an expression of values, behaviors, and performance over a long period, and however hard they might try, putting lipstick on a bulldog does not give you a poodle, just a bulldog with lipstick, unlikely to be a pretty sight.
Much better to define what they stand for, take the knocks that will come from those who disagree, but consistently articulate a set of values through which they see the world and its vagaries. Only by that means, over a reasonable time, will they stand for something that the voting punters feel they can rely on. That then becomes their “narrative”, no different to building a commercial brand, and just as hard, except that they are not using their own money to do it, which perhaps is the reason they are so poor at it.
