Jun 12, 2015 | Change, Customers, Marketing, Strategy
apologies to Scott Brinker, www.chiefmartec.com
Faced with so much choice of technology and platform options to reach and engage consumers, many marketers are paralysed. On the other hand, many are tempted to be all things to all people, simply because the tools are there to reach them, and they hope that they strike a hot prospect somewhere.
“It’s a numbers game” dominates many conversations, and it seems limiting your options is silly.
However, the customer has extraordinarily well developed bullshit meters to filter out the digital noise, so unless you are very specific with the offer, it will not pass the filter, it will not be seen.
It seems to me there is way too little being done to consider the people we are trying to reach. It is ironic that the tools have given us access to their lives, but often we choose to ignore the individual and chase the usually poorly defined “triibe”. A great description coined by Seth Godin, now misused by many.
We need to stop obsessing about the tools and ask ourselves three basic questions:
What is it we are trying to do?,
Why should anyone care?
How do we use these tools now available to make a difference?.
It seems to me there are four strategies
- Establish your “Why“. Simon Sinek in his seminal TED talk compellingly makes the argument that this is the core of marketing, to quote, “people do not get what you do, they get why you do it”.
- Build relationships. This sounds a bit yukkie, but when done with a genuine desire to help, and add value to others, it delivers to both parties. The twin brothers of C21 marketing, “Social media marketing” and “content marketing” have between them led us astray. Everyone is working feverishly at the tools trying to be different, the face in the crowd that stands out, but mostly failing, there are just too many faces, and too few asking the follow up question of “what am I going to do with them when I have their attention”. For the faces, they are attracted from time to time and let down somehow, and have become even more reluctant to give anything easily.
- Bridge the gap between what you say, and the customer experience. Too many marketers are there for the money, not for the joy of delivering on the “why”, and do not really care about the challenge of getting their customers to say “that was amazing?” Marketing is emerging as the difference between success and failure in this commoditised and transparent world, so you better get some of the rare good stuff.
- Choose your tools based on the behavior of the individual consumer. There are so many tools, and combinations of tools available, that making the choices becomes a task of considerable proportion. Choosing the right combination can be the difference, so make sure you choose on the basis of the best way to match your messages to the behavior of the consumer, not by what is available. No good having a hammer when you need a screwdriver. When you are building a deck at the back of the house, the choice is obvious, but when building a bridge to the consumer, the discriminating factor is their behavior in any given set of circumstances, and this is really hard to predict, you really need to understand them in great detail. There is too much technology, it has become the end, rather than the means.
When you are stuck, give me a call.
Jun 1, 2015 | Governance, Strategy
image thanks to Hugh McLeod www.gapingvoid.com
Writing about strategy, and practicing its development with clients, there are always a number of things that do not fit comfortably into the various academic boxes.
That is the nature of the beast, uncertain, instinctual, and driven by insights that usually evolve over time.
I have recorded them just so they do not get forgotten in the general “whoopsy” that goes on in a strategy process. The orderly, sequential process so beloved by scholars and PowerPoint designers is a rarity in my experience.
I am sure you have stumbled across others, but following is my list of reminders.
- Almost all strategic outcomes evolve from trends and developments outside your business, things over which you have no direct control. The best you can do is prepare, anticipate and react better and quicker than your competitors.
- Peter Drucker said that “the only truly sustainable competitive advantage is innovation” and he was right. However, innovation for itself is of no value, it only gains value in the hands of a customer. Therefore the earlier you can get an idea, new product, new business model, whatever it is into the hands of your customers the better, then you have real market research to work with. What often passes for “innovation” that is internal is virtually always (I have never seen it otherwise) better called operational improvement.
- Competitive advantage arises not just when your product is a new gizmo, with new packaging, it arises when you beat up on your competition, create new demand, and open new markets. That is why you are doing this stuff, to win, so don’t be seduced by clichés.
- Strategy is as much about, if not more about, what you will not do, rather than just what you will do. At a base level, strategy is about choice, which markets, which customers, which priority resource allocations are made. These choices should, in a fundamental way, drive everything else
- Size usually does matter, but in the case of strategy, it is one of the few exceptions. In fact, it often seems to me that the smaller enterprises benefit more from a good strategy well implemented than a large one. Perhaps this is a measure of greater opportunity due to the lesser existing coverage.
- Speaking of size, growth for the sake of it is stupid. Commercial activity is all about returns on the funds employed, putting your money to work doing “A” instead of ‘B” because the long term returns are better. Size for the sake of itself only plays a role when human ego gets involved.
- Setting out to “delight” all customers is nonsense. Nobody can be all things to all people, and it is probably the case that if you are not annoying some you have backed away from some of the hard strategic choices. Net result of that is your overall strategy is weaker.
- Committing to a well thought out strategy does not require heroic quantitative predictions about the future. Commitment to a strategy requires that the tough choices be made that create a framework for future priority setting, resource allocation and decision making which together anticipate, accommodate and leverage the future as it arrives.
- An understanding of the differences between agility and flexibility is required. Being strategically flexible implies that you change your strategy as events unfold, which is a sure sign that tough up front choices have not been made. Agility by contrast implies that you are able to accommodate events as they unfold in the most appropriate manner without losing sight of the overall objectives. Generals have known through the ages that strategy rarely survives the first contact with the enemy, the same applies to commercial strategy, “lose the battle, win the war”. This truism demonstrates the difference between agility and flexibility.
- Finally, you get 1/10 for talking, the other 9/10 are reserved for doing. Moving ahead with a strategy that may still have some holes, and learning as you go, is far better than waiting until all the i’s are dotted, and t’s crossed, as that involves lots of talking, not enough doing.
What things have you come across that could be added?
May 29, 2015 | Branding, Marketing, Small business
Build to last
“Brand” is a widely misused and misunderstood term, often referring to a whole range of devices, symbols and expressions that are no more than single elements of the whole.
Building a brand in the digital age of speed, idea cloning and ubiquitous communication is a real challenge, but those who get it right, win big time.
Just look at Apple. When Steve Jobs came back, it was just about broke, now it is one of the largest, and most successful corporations the world has ever seen.
Do you need any more evidence that branding in the digital age works?
While Apple is not the corner store, the foundations of Apple can be applied to every brand, and every business, from the corner store right up to Apple, whose retailing operations in the Apple stores are setting new benchmarks for retail performance.
1. Start inside. No brand can exist in isolation of the internal values and culture of the business they represent. No amount of smart advertising and slick promotion can substitute for great customer experience and value generation, which starts inside.
2. Seduce, don’t sell. Today’s consumers are smart, advertising sensitive and cynical, they need to be seduced by the superior value your brand represents, the experience it delivers. Purchase decisions are not always rational, and when a successful brand is involved in the choice, the equation usually does not have much weight on the price component of the value equation.
3. Lead, don’t follow. Brands have the capacity to lead consumers towards a place they have not been before, or not considered, as they create new value propositions. They look for trends that have the potential to crash into each other at some point, and change behaviour, and then see them before anyone else. Then they build an offer at the point of intersection, often creating the disruption themselves. The great ice hockey player Wayne Gretsky said he did not skate to the puck, he skated to where the puck would be. Successful brands do the same thing, lead, they certainly do not follow or react fads and short term “opportunities”.
4. Sweat the small stuff. Every potential touch point a customer may have at some point with a brand is an opportunity to enhance the brand, or add to the depreciation. Jobs’ fanatical dedication to making even the things no consumer was ever likely to see perfect is legend, but provided a platform for consumers belief that Apple was simply “better”
5. Commitment and focus. Brands that succeed do so because over a considerable period that stay focused on their core “Why” as Simon Sinek would put it. They do not succumb to corporate politics, marketing “short-termism”, and distractions from the market, they hunker down for the long term and deliver what the brand stands for at every opportunity.
6. Broad appeal. Really successful brands have a set of values that cross normal product category lines, and they are able to deliver in differing categories. They are able to accommodate shifts in consumer behaviour because they are not defined by their product attributes, but by their values and relationships with customers.
7. Relish and learn from competition. Marketplaces are demanding places, and only the best survive and prosper. Watching the steps and missteps of competitors makes brands stronger, and when a strong brand has strong competition, they both get better. That is the nature of competition.
8. Design is crucial. A well designed and executed product, and peripheral material like adverting, packaging, and look and feel of the product itself can deliver a unique message to consumers about the values that their purchase choice is delivering to them. Unmistakable, and remarkable are terms that every brand owner should chase for their offering.
9. Defy conventional wisdom. Unless a brand is distinctive, memorable and creates value, it will go unnoticed, and the best way to be noticed is to defy conventional wisdom. Do not do what everyone else is doing, find a way to add value by being different.
10. Communicate facts that resonate. Today’s smart consumers are less likely to be seduced by flimsy claims their parents accepted, they want solid information, facts that are relevant to them on which to make what they see as rational purchase decisions. They recognise preferences are no longer formed by fancy and extensive advertising, but by the realities that their target customers believe.
11. Design for people. Successful brands are never for everyone, their do not squander scarce resources trying to be so. In contrast, the design the brand experience is designed for the specific people who are most likely to be their loyal and lifelong customers.
A brand is more than a collection of attributes and deliverables, it is a long term strategic platform for growth and profitability. Why would you not invest in that?
May 26, 2015 | Governance, Leadership, Strategy
cartoon courtesy Hugh McLeod www.gapingvoid.com
Part of what I do day to day is made up of business reviews. Whilst every business is different, and the competitive environment is different, there are some common questions to be asked that tend to reveal the effectiveness and impact of strategic and business planning.
Strategic planning has become a cliché, often just meaning the three day off site that stuffs up your week, and takes some preparation in case you are asked some difficult questions, but following is a checklist of things I look for in a plan, which may assist your thinking.
Major trends. What are the external, big picture things that are, or will impact on your business. Trends such as technology, the regulatory environment, trade barriers, et al that have the potential to change the context in which the plan has to live. These are generally much “bigger” than a one year time frame, although the pace of technical change often gives the lie to that generality.
AAR on previous forecasts. “AAR” is an acronym, “After Action Review” which emerged from the US army after the debacle of Vietnam. They sought to quickly, and from a grass roots perspective, understand what went wrong, what worked, and how it could have been improved. In effect is it a continuous improvement cycle. Applying the same thinking to the previous years forecasts and assumptions always reveals opportunities for learning. If it is the first time, do it for the last 2 or three years, and analyse what the businesses did, or should have learnt from these experiences.
How and why the differences. Planning should be a rolling, self improving process, but so often I see planning done in isolation of the opportunities to learn from the past. Understanding the reasons why forecasts are different from one planning period to another requires an explicit understanding of the assumptions made. This step builds on the AAR above.
How would you double the business. Most business planning tends to be incremental, a 3% increase in sales, a 2% decrease in costs, it is all easy to agree to in a planning meeting, after all, who would not agree to increments of improvement? To get away from incrementalism, consider what it would take to double, or triple the business. What would you need to do differently, what new products, markets, customers would you have to acquire. I like to change the perspective to this by adopting a position 3 years down the track, imagining the business has doubled, and imagining what changes had been necessary, and how they had been implemented. With the benefit of imagined hindsight, what did we do right, what mistakes were made, what capabilities and capacities did we have to increase, how did we fund the increase, all sorts of confronting questions that in the answering offer insights to the planning process.
Where is the growth coming from. Everyone predicts growth, it is part of the commercial DNA, but articulating where it is coming from introduces some reality checks. If it is from a competitor, why will they just let the volume go? what will their reactions be, and how will you in turn react to their responses? If it is from new products, why would a customer buy yours instead of the one they had been buying, and if it is a new market you are creating, how is your value proposition sufficiently compelling to get the attention of a potential customer, and how are you going to justify the new expenditure in a market that they are unfamiliar with?
What are your distinctive strengths, and how does the plan leverage them? It is astonishing to me how often when I ask this question that the responses are reflections of the market table stakes the things you have to do well just to survive and be competitive, they are not distinctive. It is like a watchmaker proudly claiming that their watch tells exact time. So what, to be a watch, you have to be able to reliably tell the time, it is not distinctive, it is table stakes. What makes you distinctive, does something really different, passes Seth Godins “purple cow” test. It may be that your watch is waterproof to 200 meters. Not many will take advantage of this strength, but to some, the guarantee of waterproof performance will be distinctive. The problem now becomes how you reach the small number of those who care at the time the are considering a purchase.
What differentiates you from the competition, and importantly, the potential left field competition? This question is often confused with the one above, a strength is not necessarily a distinctive capability that adds value to a customer that would drive them into your arms. To continue the watch analogy, when the Japanese started delivering digital watches, the Swiss that at that time absolutely dominated the watch market failed to recognise the attraction of the differentiation that had just taken place, and were decimated.
What would a private equity owner do with this business?. This can be a confronting question, but a very useful one. If you look at the business from an entirely different perspective, one whose time frame and investment return metrics are both aggressive, and usually entirely different to the prevailing horizons, it can stimulate some thinking that is very useful, and informs the rest of the discussion.
Creating a strategy that has real “grunt” and articulating that plan to all stakeholders that are impacted, and can contribute is a huge challenge, and takes time, commitment and brain power to achieve. Unfortunately, the success rate of strategic planning is very low, testament to the difficulty, and the number of things that can go wrong.
May 21, 2015 | Customers, Sales
Making an offer they cannot refuse is the ultimate selling outcome, notwithstanding the limitations of the law, and common decency.
So how do you make a Godfather offer?
- Know your customer intimately
- Know their business intimately
- Know their pain-points like they were your own
- Create an offer that removes the pain-points for them
- Make the payoff compelling
- Make the payoff unique
- Present the offer like your life depended on it, with passion, conviction, and from the receivers perspective.
- Create tension in the decision by ensuring there is a decision time after which the offer is off the table.
This works pretty much all the time.
When you are able to the identify components of a problem a potential customer has, for which you have a solution that is both valuable to them, and unique, and you clearly understand all the challenges in their situation, why would they not buy from you?
