Plans never reflect what happens, so why bother?

Plans never reflect what happens, so why bother?

 

Commercial success, that which delivers more than a wage, comes from only two places:

    • Critical thinking
    • The ability and willingness to be a bit different, experiment and embrace risk.

Why is it then that the web is full of ‘7 point plans to….’ Templates designed to remove the need to think, and assuring us that if we follow the plan, all will be well.

I have been as guilty as most, reducing some of what I publish on this blog to lists of sequential actions. This sort of headline increases readership of a post significantly, people want packaged solutions that promise an answer to a complex problem but removes the need to think.

I have been as seduced as anyone by the vanity of page views.

The important part of any plan, from the most complex to the mundane list of what you must do today is that it is the result of critical thought.

What is important vs urgent?

Is this the best use of that absolutely finite resource: Your time?

How will this impact on those around me?

General Eisenhower made the observation that ‘plans are worthless, but planning is everything‘.  Eisenhower further noted that emergencies were unexpected, and therefore planning for them was impossible.

Noted philosopher Michael Tyson’s contribution is perhaps the best known “everyone has a plan until they get hit in the mouth”.

Besides, without a plan, and associated goals, how will you ever know how you are performing?

The act of planning should be an act of critical and creative thinking, not filling in a formulaic set of generic questions.

 

Header credit: Scott Adams with an early question from Dilbert.

 

 

 

 

 

Where can a manufacturing business get money for nothing?

Where can a manufacturing business get money for nothing?

 

There is a simple answer, but the money is just a bit harder to find.

It is tied up in your current operations, consumed by all manner of things that do not add value to a customer.

Machine down time, rework, waste, on line inventory, double handling, and a host of other things that get in the way of a steady, predictable and continuous flow through a factory.

Progress to completion through a production process can only go as fast as the slowest point in the process. Working around these choke points entails either building WIP inventory, or slowing the faster parts down to the speed of the slowest part of the process. There is no third internal option, but ‘outsourcing’ the slow bits is sometimes a productive choice.

Progressive removal of any impediment to a predictable even ‘flow’ and you will save money. However, even more importantly, you will free up capacity that will give you the opportunity to sell more from the same fixed cost base.

That is where the gold hides: Money for nothing.

Do you want it?

 

5 ways marketers should respond to disruptive AI.

5 ways marketers should respond to disruptive AI.

In this new world of marketing, being reshaped by Artificial Intelligence, how should those concerned with the longevity and salience of their brands respond?

Innovate.

AI is really good at looking at what has happened in the past, but has yet to develop a crystal ball to tell the future. Marketers key responsibility is to tell the future, then shape the resource allocation decisions their enterprises make to best leverage what they think will happen. No future comes in a linear fashion, but AI can only reflect in a linear way, in response to the algorithms on which it was trained.

Strategise.

Strategy is a game of choice, where what you will not do is at least as important and often more so than what you will do. Again, these choices are based on what you think might happen, and as noted, these are never linear choices. Strategy in a world being homogenised by access to data will be more fundamentally important than ever.

Manage Communication structures.

Yesterday’s world was dominated by silos. The simple fact is that customers do not care about your silos, only how you deliver value to them. Enterprises have evolved hierarchical silo structures as the most efficient way to allocate and manage resources. That remained true until the mid-nineties, and most enterprises still have not got the memo. Today, even any hint of silos and barriers to communication internally, and more importantly with customers, will lead to a rapid and fiery death at the hands of data and its scribe, AI.

Remove marketing complexity.

The last 20 years have seen a multiplication and fragmentation of communication channels to customers and consumers, along with the inevitable silent middlemen and rent seekers who just siphon off dollars with little or no value add. The complexity of the choices and channels has created a situation where the analysis of the value of marketing expenditure is little short of a children’s guessing game. This is despite and partly because of because of the plethora of options and tools. The only way to address this complexity is to cut the gordian know and simplify, simplify, and then simplify some more. In other words, marketing focus driven by strategy. Easy to say, hard to do.

Generate attention.

The main game of being relevant in a huge homogeneous crowd is to first generate attention. You do that by being different, and being different with a big dose of energy being injected into the differences that are relevant to customers and consumers because they solve real problems, delivering them real value.

If you do all that, while leveraging the capabilities of AI, and digital systems generally, it will be your competitors that struggle, while you are ahead of the game.

Header cartoon credit: Tom Gauld

Spectacle is a great content marketing tool.

Spectacle is a great content marketing tool.


 

It seemed impossible to ignore that piece of luxurious marketing content being rammed down our throats over the weekend, after a build-up over previous weeks. After Christianity, the British monarchy is the most successful, long term marketing program on the planet, and what a show they produced on Saturday!.

Like most, I watched bits of the coronation at a mates place, conveniently happening on a Saturday evening. Along with a large and sometimes noisy bunch of friends, piles of delicious nibblies and a mountain of spicey BBQ’d sausages, the debate over the relevance of the occasion raged. There may have also been a few lubricants. My friend and his wife were born in England but came here to escape to the good weather and to dodge the crushing burden of just being English. It was however a big relief when Charlie stepped under the big hat, indicating the excruciatingly boring but for some compulsive watching was nearing an end.

To some it may be interesting to recall that if it were not for deed polls (or the royal equivalent) Charlie Windsor would have been named Charles Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. That mouthful was the family name of his mother Elizabeth, changed to Windsor by her great grandfather King George V in 1917. That change was probably prompted by the fact that London at the time was being bombed by King Georges first cousin Kaiser Wilhelm of Germany, using the first heavy bomber capable of such a mission, the ‘Gotha’.

It seems a bit slow to change your family name from a German one to a British one after almost four years of war. Perhaps it was that Georgie did not want to upset his cousin any more than he already was.

I wonder what the Murdoch press would have made of that at the time. Ruperts father of course had been sending false reports back to George and his cronies from Gallipoli just two years earlier. Fake news reporting must run in the Murdoch family.

Families are often difficult, especially when the tree has grown in an environment insulated from any sort of genetic diversity, which perhaps explains a lot. It is however somewhat pleasing to see that apart from the inheritance of wealth and position at the tip of the artificial British social hierarchy, they are pretty normal. Broken marriages, sibling rivalry, affairs, seedy personal practises, the odd visit to barristers, grifters, and social media advisors, and the never-ending demands from people they do not know to donate money.

All good fun, and we finished the night watching ‘The Windsors’ on Netflix. If you haven’t caught up with it, hurry before it goes away. Satire to some is a documentary to others.

Vive le Republique!

 

 

The two key building blocks of strategy.

The two key building blocks of strategy.

 

Strategy is all about choice: what we will not do is at least as important as what we will do.

When you dig a level deeper into the generic ‘will I or won’t I’, you come to the question of how do you make what are almost always difficult choices between options in the absence of full information.

At a top level, that choice is driven by two factors:

Cost structure.

There is always a cost to delivering product. Understanding the cost drivers associated with your product and business model is essential. You will then be able to make informed choices about how best to minimise those costs without compromising the value you deliver to customers.

Value creation.

Selling a product of any type depends on a buyer seeing the value created by their purchase as being greater than the cost of the purchase. ‘Value’ is a very personal term. The value of an expensive watch is not in the ability of that watch to tell the time, it resides in a range of psychological drivers that drive individual behaviour and choice.

Until recently, most of the costs involved were of a physical nature, now they are increasingly behavioural. Similarly with value creation, in the past it was the utility you got out of a physical purchase, but physical utility has been usurped by digital and emotional utility.

Understanding both is critical to success.