Corporate KPI’s should be evolved as a hierarchy, that measures the cause and effect relationships through an organisation, and be largely agnostic to the individual. After they are in place, you can develop the KPI’s for a role to be filled, for which an individual allocated to that position has responsibility.
There are 4 levels in most organisations that I see.
Measures of sustainability.
These measures are connected to the purpose of the enterprise, they answer the question, how do you know if you are successful?. Sustainability is used in it broadest sense, commercial, cultural, and ecological. In effect they are the harbingers of future success as well as current levels. Most organisational KPI’s that I see are all about financial success, which is critical, but is an outcome of success in other areas, not in itself a driver of success.
Measures of strategic success.
These measures are directly related to the strategic priorities set. As strategy is about choices, so the performance measures should reflect the quality of the choices made, and progress towards the agreed objective. Some will be financial, ROI, shareholder value, but the most effective ones will be about customer churn, geographic footprint, innovation, customer satisfaction, reflecting the strategic resource allocation decisions made to prioritise activities.
Process measures.
Process measures are those tactical measures that reflect the performance of the processes in the business that deliver value to customers, and feed the measures of strategic success. These will vary widely dependent on the type of business, but logically they include things like customer satisfaction, delivery performance, lead conversion, revenue, customer profitability, and so on. They tend to be the measures most appropriately reviewed on a shorter time scale than those above.
Operational KPI’s.
Operational measures should deliver a picture of how the individual cogs in the wheel are operating. They should be directed at the items that are at the root of process productivity and efficiency. Measures such as machine availability, lost time injuries, rework, inventory turn, daily output to plan, and so on.
Together these measures should offer a complete picture of the way the separate parts of the organisation mesh together to deliver the enterprise purpose, the ‘Why’ you are here.
Ensuring measures are transparent across and through the organisation gives them ‘life’ beyond the dry review process.
Financial measures play a role at each level. However, because it is generally easier to gather financial information, and they are more commonly understood, they have become the default and only measures many use, which is to their detriment. They also fail the test of telling you why an outcome occurred, they just tell you it did.
Mapping the cause and effect chains summarised as KPI’s is always a useful exercise. Many people learn and understand visually, particularly when they have a role in the process mapping, and such an exercise enables a connection of KPI’s throughout an enterprise to be made. Experience shows it is a great way of generating the strategic alignment and buy-in so hard to find in most businesses.
