Oct 29, 2014 | Marketing, Small business, Strategy
Any business that has done business with the supermarkets knows that they are not there to do you any favours. They have shareholders to keep happy, customers to sell to at the lowest prices possible consistent with their margin objectives , competitors to beat, and shelf space for sale to their suppliers.
In order to survive and prosper selling via supermarket distribution takes a business model that is tailored to the demands that the retailers make.
Following are 10 strategies that have worked in the past, the more of them you cover off the better, and the first few are mandatory.
- Understand the supermarket business model. The supermarket business model is based on three factors: high volumes, lowest possible supply chain and transaction costs, and low prices. With some minor category exceptions for some retailers, they do not vary from this model, in Australia or overseas. Given the scale of their operations, they get to set the rules, and there is little room for negotiation, even for major suppliers.
- Be savvy with data. Mass market retailing is a data intensive game. The retailers have mountains of data at their disposal, and plenty of suppliers willing and able to interpret it for them, with the obvious disadvantage to those who do not interpret. Scan data, combined with the loyalty card data increasingly being used is a goldmine of demographic, behavioural, and promotional information. Being in a position to present data with your interpretation, and having the credibility to interpret the retailers and your competitors data is a price of success.
- Aggressively execute on Category Management. Category management disciplines are the foundation of the retailers ranging, promotional and in store product placement strategies. It is data intensive, and an integral part of he business model, and as such sufficiently important to be treated as a separate “to do” for those to whom success with supermarkets is essential. Allowing your products to be “category managed” by your competitors is simply not sufficiently competitive , or aggressive. You need to execute on category management in partnership with the retailers, even if you are not in the “category captain” role.
- Build a brand that has relevance and connection to consumers. The alternative to having a brand that has at least a small but demonstrable group of consumers your brand has no effective substitute, and who will perhaps change their choice of retailer for, is essential. To be a price taker with no leverage at all, is to be an irrelevant supplier who is absolutely dispensable.
- Recognise you have two customers. The supermarkets may be your direct customers, but the consumer is also your customer, indirectly. As a part of brand building, you need to open communication channels with consumers, so that they are predisposed to buy your products. This may seem like brand building, and it is, but it is more short term direct, and actionable than building a brand which is a long term investment. Direct promotional and communication activity can now be a part of your tactical marketing plans in a far more directed manner than has ever been possible before.
- Remove transaction costs. Transaction costs have two basic causes, the first is not getting “it right first time” requiring rework to correct, and the second is the penalty of small scale. It costs the same to raise and process an invoice of $1,000 as it does for an invoice of $100,000. To the extent that technology can be applied to process the invoices, the costs will not be material, but if people are involved, the costs of the $1,000 invoice is 100 times as much as the $100,000 invoice. This relationship is reflected throughout the supply and distribution chain, and even minor improvements can deliver substantial savings. The source of Woolworths superior performance over the last decade compared to Coles has been the impact of their reductions in transaction costs that have dropped straight to the profit line. Wal-Mart became the biggest retailer in the world by focussing on the reduction of transaction costs of all types, and passing the savings on to consumers as lower prices.
- Collaborate for scale. Small suppliers to supermarkets have to find ways to apply leverage to their opportunities. Collaborating to reduce various forms of transaction and supply chain costs , as well as pooling data and data capabilities are logical if challenging tasks. Many produce suppliers have found ways to collaborate, but their produce is unbranded, and commoditised by retailers, so it is harder for branded FMCG but nevertheless possible.
- Constantly innovate. It is almost a cliché, but nevertheless true, that to stay still is to be left behind. Innovation is a part of the necessary armoury of success. Not just innovation in the product supplied by the means of its production and supply require constant innovation.
- Build agile value chains. Commercial agility is the ability to alter processes in the face of changed circumstances without resorting to non value adding discussion and debate, and without losing sight of the objective. Agility is not flexibility, which implies that things “bend” then go back to normal. By contrast, agile value chains have the characteristic of being able to evolve rapidly, and improve in the process.
- Do not play. The last and most obvious strategy is to ignore the supermarkets, and play in channels they do not control where the value in the product is able to be recognised in some way that is impossible in the high volume low margin supermarket game. Depending on how you measure, and what category we are talking about, supermarkets control between 50 and 80% of FMCG sales, which leaves some 30 billion of Australian FMCG sales left over, not an insignificant sum.
That is an awful lot to do, and the best time to start was a while ago. However, the second best time is now, so go to it. If you need a bit of assistance, just get in touch, and I will bring along my 35 years of experience with this stuff and put it at your disposal.
Oct 28, 2014 | Change, Small business
You know the old story, the plumber who goes around fixing other peoples dripping taps, but has a houseful of leakers himself.
This site has been my home since march 2009, and it has been full of leaking metaphorical taps. All the things I admonished my clients to do, or not to do were here.
A freebie hosting that prevented a whole host of functionality
No analytics beyond the most basic few measures
A boring and dull site template
Well, all that is in the process of changing, I am taking my own advice, and fixing the leaky taps.
The hosting has been moved, several plugins added, along with an analytics package. Progressively over the near future you will see the changes evolving as I progressively fix the taps.
About time!!
What will not change is the commitment to bring original marketing thinking and ideas to the small businesses that are the lifeblood, the reason for being of this site. I hope you continue to enjoy, comment on, share and learn from the posts and the comments they elicit.
Let me know what you think, your comments are both welcome, and vital to improvement.
Oct 20, 2014 | Customers, Marketing, Small business, Social Media, Strategy
Most Aussies will probably recognise the diagram above, the London Underground.
The first time anyone arrives in London, an underground map is a vital piece of paper, even in these days of mobile phone enabled GPS tools.
The underground system in London is pretty complex until you figure out how it works, and when you take into account the interchanges with London buses and British rail, it is not something you approach without a clear understanding of the details of your intended journey. To get anywhere, you need to know just two things:
Where you are
Where you need to go.
After that, with the map, you can figure out the best way to get there ,what the route options may be, what it will cost, and how long it should take to get to the destination.
Why is it that people understand this instinctively for a sojourn on the underground, but fail to do it for their business?
Social Media is the shiny new toy around at the moment, everyone knows it is there, some dabble in it without a map, and get lost, have their pockets picked, and decide that from now on they will catch a taxi, if they really have to get somewhere. Other wise they will just stay in their hotel.
“Social Media” used as a noun, has some similarity to the underground, in that it is complex, but navigable with a map, where it differs is that it changes, evolves, even mutates, every single day, in some meaningful way. However, if you understand the structure, where and how it all fits together, navigation can become relatively easy, relatively risk free, and open up the opportunities of a wonderful tool.
Need a map?
Oct 17, 2014 | Branding, Marketing, Strategy
Majors Bay Rd Concord, Sydney.
No business can do everything, so the easy way to start is to do the thing you can do well, as long as it is at least partly the thing that also makes you different.
In a suburb not far from me in Sydney, there is a street that over the last 5 years or so has evolved into an eclectic mix of cafes and restaurants, occasionally separated by some other hang-over shop from a previous age. There must be 25 or 30 of them down both sides of the street, each vying for a share of the dollars the punters bring in from all over Sydney.
One of the cafes, on a corner, not only has plenty of outside room on the footpath, friendly service, and a good range of only mildly over priced cafe meals, and treats, they also roast their own coffee beans. This just reinforces that they have the best and freshest coffee experience in the area, supported by a blend of service, location and that aroma as they roast.
Intoxicating.
It also confirms them as “knowing their coffee” an important cache in an environment where coffee-wankery is reaching disturbing proportions, and cafe’s are springing up like mushrooms after rain.
It cannot be too hard to set up a roasting operation, it delivers a great marketing advantage to the cafe, offers an added income stream from bagged coffee sales, and, oh, did I mention the aroma?
Differentiating yourself is a must in this homogenising world, and doing it in a way that reinforces the marketing story in the way this cafe has done merits competitive success, which by my observation every time I go there is substantial.
Oct 15, 2014 | Change, Management, Strategy
There is no such thing as “equalibrium”, just constant change.
I have a mate who is an academic economist, a really smart guy used to arguing a point of view, and with a box of stats on call to support any contention he makes, alternatively to pull down anything that runs contrary to his argument.
He is very convincing.
An ongoing debate has been around the nature of management, and particularly marketing in the face of the changes that have been wrought by the digital revolution. His view, if I can summarise, is that the forces that have emerged will find a new point of equilibrium, and it is our task as managers to identify that point, minimise costs on the path towards it, then be in a position to leverage for the maximum outcome when it is reached.
Economics 101.
My contention is that the assumption that an equilibrium will be found is flawed, and that the better analogy is the ecosystem, constantly evolving and changing in response to the adjustment of the forces that interact on the inhabitants, and the better strategy is to assume that everything will change, some things over night, some with a bit more lead time, and the forces that are interacting to drive the changes are not necessarily evident from wherever it is you sit.
My evidence, in contrast to his is all anecdotal and perspective, challenging for an econometrician.
Often I refer him to the antitrust suit brought by the US government against the “monopoly” that Microsoft had, an action that was finally binned by President Clinton. The equilibrium argument suggested that the Microsoft empire would endure and continue to crush competitors, and that the brakes had to be imposed externally, when the reality is that Linux came along, followed by the rise and rise of Apple, emergence of Android, and within a very few years Microsoft was relegated to the role of an also-ran, albeit one with a mountain of cash.
Enterprises of any type and size that fail to accommodate the ecosystem metaphor, preferring to rely on an emerging equilibrium that they can leverage is in for a long wait, and ultimately a visit to the insolvency practitioner, unless of course they are a public body in which case the just continue to cry poor, and suck at the teat of the taxpayer.
My conclusion therefore is that there is no new equilibrium on the horizon, continuous and pervasive change is with us and the only thing that will change is the speed of the changes themselves, and our ability to respond.
Planning to disrupt your apparent equilibrium, the existing business model that has served well is a confronting undertaking, but a necessary one for commercial survival. A depth of experience an understanding of the traps can save much heartache, so I would be happy to apply my experience to help navigate a path.
