Are the marketing four P’s still relevant?

Are the marketing four P’s still relevant?

 

 

In 1960, E. Jerome McCarthy published his idea of the four foundations of marketing. Price, Promotion, Product, and Place. The world has changed in the intervening 62 years, so you must wonder if this idea is still relevant, let alone a foundation.

To my mind, they are not only relevant, but retain their place as a seminal part of the marketing process, it is just that the context in which we think about marketing has changed radically, so the role the 4 P’s plays has also evolved.

This used to be simple, there was a product, and there was a price. Whether it was a consumer product, or one sold to another business, it was simple, and uncongested with notions of service.

Life, and the environment in which we compete has completely changed. Let’s see.

Product.

The idea of ‘product’ has changed along with everything else. We used to buy a car, increasingly, we are now buying the means to get from point A to point B, and discovering new ways to pay for it beyond the options of cash, or some sort of loan from a bank.

Product rather than being a singular physical product or service delivered has become a system that delivers value. The scope of ‘produc’t has also changed from the immediate geography to global, and the channels by which this is achieved look nothing like those available 62 years ago.

Price.

The exchange of money is how the economy goes round; money is the fuel. However, the articulation of the ‘Price’ of a product/service bundle has changed as much as everything else. Along with the product and delivery options now available are the pricing options. There are now many ways to be paid, only a few of which were available 62 years ago.

In all developed economies to differing degrees, the taxi industry has been regulated over time. Nothing changed from 1962 when the ‘Four P’s were articulated until along came Uber and disrupted the cosy taxi environment. Uber eliminated the uncertainty of how long you had to wait for a ride, creating great psychological value, and introduced surge pricing that would entice more supply into the system at times of high demand.

Surge and subscription pricing have changed the face of commerce globally. Amazon uses both in their operations, adding the willingness of a buyer to pay higher prices based on their browsing and purchase history.

Place.

We used to buy products at a defined place, in a defined manner. No longer. The notion of ‘Place’ has been replaced by one of ‘How’ you buy rather than ‘where you buy’.

The old model of a set of mechanically driven distribution channels has been replaced by a melange of ‘omni channels’ that deliver value in a wide variety of ways.

Control of the channels, formerly in the hands of the sellers has moved into the hands of the buyers, who demand and are given in increasing amounts of transparency backwards into the supply chain. All this is enabled by the explosive growth of digital technology.

Promotion.

If the other factors have changed radically, there are no words to describe the magnitude of the change to the ways promotional activity has evolved.

It used to mean the way we gained attention of potential customers via a limited number of options, engaged them, then sold product through whichever stable distribution channel was available. While the core process is unchanged, how we promote out products has exploded.

This brings us back to the question posed: are the for ‘P’s’ of marketing still relevant.

My answer is ‘Yes’, but the clothes they wear have changed radically and therefore the way we think about then must change.

My response to the change necessary is to look at the marketing process more from the perspective of the customer. This brings me to the view that both customer and supplier can look at the process from within the framework of Objectives, Value proposition, Ideal customer, and the Current state. Each party to a transaction sees these four parameters differently, but they are all relevant to the way the transection and relationship proceeds.

 

Earnouts, payouts and pitfalls of SMEs engaging in M&A.

Earnouts, payouts and pitfalls of SMEs engaging in M&A.

 

 

Covid has led to quite a bit of M&A activity amongst the difficulties of trading. I know several ‘baby boomers’ who have just packed up and left. A number have sold businesses they previously intended to continue for a while, and leave ongoing entities to family, and other shareholders.

Several have sold with an earnout period and discovered too late that there were things in the fine print that tripped them up and reduced the payout to next to nothing.

Poor planning and advice, but most importantly, lack of attention to the implications of the financial detail in the agreements.

Following are a number of the common pitfalls you should be aware of.

However, first and foremost, you must recognise that a payout period is really just a transfer of risk from the buyer to the seller. The degree of this transfer is dependent on the conditions in the contract and actions taken by the buyer post transaction.

Earnout revenue targets.

These come in many forms, often broken into categories.

  • Many purchases are made for the sole reason of gaining access to the seller’s customer list. In this case, the seller is kept on to assure those customers that it is business as usual despite the change in ownership. Many things out of the control of the seller can impact on the attitudes of the customers, and often a change of ownership is just the catalyst customers needed to look around, and do an assessment of the levels of value being delivered. This usually results in revenue being lost.
  • A buyer may cut the sales and marketing expenditure impacting on sales, a decision out of the control of the seller, but potentially impacting on the earnout numbers.
  • A buyer often justifies some of the benefit of a purchase in the ‘back office’ economies they appear to bring. These projected savings can be the result of over optimistic projections around available savings made to fit the guidelines of the purchaser. They can have the impact of reductions in the level and acceptability of the service provided to customers. These can impact revenue and payout numbers while being out of the control of the seller.
  • Post transaction, sellers often lack the drive and commitment they had prior to the sale, despite the earnout terms.

EBIT targets

EBIT targets are even more ‘manageable’ than revenue targets  by a buyer. Being at the bottom of the P&L offers opportunity to load up expense captions from Cost of Goods Sold through trading expenses and fixed costs in all sorts of ways. This will be detrimental to the seller’s payout at the end of the period. Human nature being what it is, there is little motivation for the buyer to maximise the payout to the seller, and conversely, many reasons to take a ‘hit’ in the first periods of ownership that also serve to reduce the payout. Just a few of the many examples I have seen:

  • IT integration costs, often the basis of M&A justification blow out way beyond expectations.
  • One off costs associated with staff redundancies can cost a lot of money. Often there are assurances in place about staff, but who needs two of everything post acquisition, so job losses are frequent and often deep, creating unplanned costs.
  • Changes in accounting practices of the acquired business, for example the valuation of inventory that is applied to the COGS, and unanticipated write-offs of excess inventory, can impact substantially on the payout numbers.
  • Loading up advertising leading up to the end of the buyout period can damage short term EBIT, but benefit the long-term position of the business, post the buyout date.

One way of at least mitigating the potential disagreements and decisions taken outside the parameters of the agreement by the buyer to reduce the payout, is to base the payout numbers on free cash flow. The ways this can be manipulated are easier to define and agree pre-acquisition such that the seller is protected. The buyer still has the ability to make the changes necessary to integrate or take over the business and reshape it. Free cash flow is less complicated than agreeing what a post-acquisition ‘normalised’ P&L would look like, as the variables are reduced, and thus it becomes easier to make transparent and enforceable arrangements.

For many owners of an SME, the value tied up in the business is their superannuation.  It makes sense to be very careful, as it is probably the case that the buyer has way more experience with these types of transaction than you.

Header cartoon credit: Scott Adams and Dilbert

What does the end of cheap money mean to manufacturing SME’s?

What does the end of cheap money mean to manufacturing SME’s?

 

The inflation figures released this morning put the annualised inflation rate at 5.1%, up from 3.5% at the end of the December quarter last year. While it may bounce around given the volatility of fuel and food prices, the trend is very clear, and the current election driven lucky dip of spending promises will not help. This increase in a single quarter is the largest I can remember since the mid eighties.

Australia is in for a rocky ride, and it will not matter who wins on May 21, the impact will be felt in every corner of the economy, and by every Australian.

For SME’s who have weathered the challenges of covid and are now experiencing the added burdens of broken supply chains, and lack of labour, while trying to re-establish some level of certainty in their businesses in an environment where demand has ramped up, the prospects are daunting.

Irrespective of the decision made by the Reserve next Tuesday, to raise the cash rate from the current 0.1% to 0.4% or 0.5% which seem to be the prediction of the majority of economists, the squeeze is on. Raising the rate during an election campaign will test the independence of the reserve bank. I bet there are some phone calls being made!

How will this impact your business?

Those impacts will vary enormously depending on the industry circumstances. The rate that gets all the attention is a weighted average, with the actual sector numbers varying from a slight reduction in communication costs, to a 13.7% increase for transport costs.

  • Labour costs will soar, as the demand for labour continues to grow, while immigration is still constricted, and the cost of living blows out.
  • Transport costs, which most just see in the petrol prices at the local station, which impact everything that moves in the economy will quickly feed into cost of goods sold in every product category.
  • Businesses will see a sudden increase in their accounts receivable days, their cash conversion cycles will become longer.
  • There will be pressure on margins from multiple fronts. Volumes will be constrained as supply chain failures impact, and competitors scrambling for volume will be more likely to reduce prices to grab that extra sale. At the same time, costs are increasing, and price increases will be harder to get, as buyers exercise their buying power and shop around.
  • You will be pressured by your suppliers for quick payments, as they are being squeezed for margin, just as you are.
  • General overheads will increase. We have seen significant increases in lease costs for small factory spaces, insurance costs will be turbo-charged after the floods, fires, and pestilence of the last 2 years, down to the little things like costs of coffee for the lunchroom. All these individually manageable cost increases cumulatively add up to substantial and hard to control increases.

So, what should the SME’s that wish to remain successful be doing?

  • Customers shopping around for a deal in greater numbers can present an opportunity for those who understand the drivers of Value for customers in their specific market.
  • Resist the temptation to cut marketing and selling expenses. History demonstrates with absolute certainty that those that keep marketing when their competitors shut down in tough times not only do better during the tough times but retain their positions after the worm has turned. Optimising your marketing expenditure is not the same as cutting it.
  • Actively engage employees and stakeholders in ways to maintain profitability. This should always be a priority, but is more pressing and visible in tough times.
  • Focus on the 10 tactics outlined in the Inflation Busting Roadmap published previously
  • Consider from the perspective of necessity the five types of cost in your business, with particular attention being  given to the last three, as that is usually where the opportunities hide.

Many have not experienced a spurt of inflation before, the last serious spurt was in the mid-eighties while Paul Keating was treasurer. In management terms, this was over a generation ago. If the experience of those times would be of benefit, give me a call.

The header graph is from the ABS website updated as the announcement of the scary 5.1% heqadline inflation rate was announced.

 

Two key questions to get stuff done.

Two key questions to get stuff done.

 

Do you ever struggle to do something you know how to do, and should be easy, at least that is the way it seems, but never get past the first hurdle.

I do. Disturbingly often.

For some years I have toyed with writing a book, becoming one of those liberated by the web to publish and perhaps generate a return from what I know, the experience I have gathered in a long commercial life.

There are several started lying around, rough drafts, notes, chapter outlines, all the stuff I know I have to do to complete something that may be of value.

I have written 2 or three blog posts every week for many years. I collect lots of ideas, stories, and metaphors from clients, reading, and just rubbing my belly thinking about stuff.

How hard could it be to pull all that together in a book?

Very hard it seems, even when pushed by some of those who know me well.

If I was my own consultant, there would be some tough love and bum-kicking going on.

Like any project, there are a small number of key questions to be asked, and answered which provides a framework for the task, then some logical steps to be taken.

Key questions:

  • Who is it for? The core marketing question, who is it that you want to reach and influence to do what? In the absence of a clear answer, the result will be, at best, muddled. Luckily, I know exactly who I should be writing for.
  • Why should they care? If you expect people to spend money to buy the thing, then invest the time to read it, there had better be a good reason that they should, and that needs to be convincingly communicated.  Again, 25 years of contracting and consulting have given me a pretty good idea of the sort of knowledge and experience I can deliver that will increase the commercial sustainability of the SME manufacturers who are my ‘sweet spot’.

Logical steps:

  • Nail the title, and subtitle. The title is in effect the headline for the book ad. It needs to convey in a few words the objective and drama of the book, provide a ‘hook’ for the intended reader. For the writer, it is the equivalent of the strategic purpose, the question to be asked continuously through the whole book ‘is this taking is closer to the objective?”
  • Write the back cover. This should be the distilled sales pitch to those you want to reach. Often you will see this as an introduction, which to my mind is wasting the reader’s attention when it is the most curious, right at the beginning.  Explain the value to be gained from reading the book, and how will they use this new knowledge? Ideally, this can be written by a third party, someone with real street cred, so it sounds less like self-promotion. I do not really know many people in the category. The one who would have been ideal, my original and great mentor Harvard professor James Hagler, has been sadly gone for some years.
  • Write the Chapter list. This is the skeleton of the book, the bones from which everything hangs. A few sentences that specifically articulate what knowledge will be imparted in each chapter acts as an anchor around which the words and stores can be built. This requires creative thought, as most people will read the chapter list before buying the book, so the more interesting, differentiated, and engaging the better.
  • Write the draft, of at least 1 or 2 chapters, They will be awful, discouraging, but out if it will come the ‘voice’ that you want to use for your audience, and the structure of the chapters. One person I know wrote their whole book as draft, it worked for him, but the added work after the draft completion to redraft the whole thing when he recognised it was rubbish was almost the end.
  • Edit, edit and re-edit. Then get someone else outside to have a shot.  Better if the outsider is on side from the beginning and giving the bad news progressively so you can improve as you go, rather than all at once when the draft you have is in your mind, complete. It is hard to kill off those parts into which you have poured your sweat after the words have dried too hard on the page, and in your mind.
  • Marketing. Then there is the marketing and operational stuff of necessary to get it out there. Worrying about that too soon is just distracting, plenty of time at the end, and plenty of advice and options around on the best way forward.  However, if you are writing the book to make money from the sales, it is entirely different to the situation where you are writing it for credibility, leading to consulting assignments, and perhaps speaking gigs. These two objectives for the book require entirely different marketing strategies.
  • Do it, now. Stop thinking about it, and take action. Now.

Note to self: Read the blog, and take action as advised!

 

 

Top speed is irrelevant

Top speed is irrelevant

 

While contracting as GM of a Federal body some time ago, I used to travel from Canberra to Sydney’s western suburbs on a regular basis.

I had the choice of driving which took a predictable three hours door to door, or catch a cab to Canberra airport, wait, catch the plane to Mascot, then a cab to my Sydney destination. That method took an unpredictable 2 and a half hours to 4 hours depending on all sorts of variables over which I had no control.

My car would happily sit on the speed limit all the way, a far slower speed than the  alternative aeroplane.

Clearly, the top speed of one component of a journey will not determine the time for the whole journey, which is what really matters.

This applies to everything in life and business.

Find a way to remove the bottlenecks and the speed of your journey, whatever that is, will increase.

 

 

The 10 most read StrategyAudit posts of 2021

The 10 most read StrategyAudit posts of 2021

 

At the end of the year, it seems sensible to have a look at the posts that generated the most traffic. Surprisingly, none are posts that have gone up in this most challenging year, not an outcome I anticipated. This demonstrates the long-term value of a blog of this nature. Collecting and curating ideas and perspectives over a long period becomes an investment, certainly for me as the writer, and hopefully for those who choose to follow, or just dip in from time to time.

In order, from the most viewed, the 10 were:

5 key factors to consider when planning your budgeting process. January 2020.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-2sN

This post was the first of 2020, and did generate some traction early on. However, in the early parts of 2021, when suddenly businesses had to rethink their budgeting processes in the face of Covid it took off. It will no doubt kick along again in the early part of 2022, which is unlikely to be much more predictable than the year just finishing.

 

3 essential pieces of the supermarket business model. November 2014.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1pd

First published way back in 2014, this post has been number one or two in the most read posts every year since. Clearly the elements of the supermarket business model retain an abiding interest. Retail is also the core of my corporate experience, now 25 years behind me. Many of the illustrative stories in these pages come from that time, as the lessons are timeless. The tools have changed, the behavioural foundations remain very consistent. Even amongst the massive switch to online retailing in the past year, the foundations of retailing have remained consistent. The pace has increased geometrically, and the logistics are new, but the basic requirement for success, to add value to the consumer, remains exactly as it was.

 

The 4 dimensions of project planning. August 2017.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Gz

Every business is a mass of individual and group projects of various types and importance. This post offers a framework to consider when going about the planning processes. Planning is another form of predicting the future, and as we know, that is not a reliable process. However, planning ensures you are better prepared than just relying on being reactive as circumstances change. As Eisenhower noted just before the Normandy landings in 1944 ‘In preparing for battle, I have always found that plans are useless, but planning is indispensable’

 

The 5 strategic dimensions of price. October 2018.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-2ba

To my mind, this is one of the more important posts I have written amongst the 2100 over 13 years. How to set and maintain optimum price is a challenging, even confronting task, too often not given the strategic importance it deserves. After all, every added dollar of revenue you can extract from the marketplace falls straight to the bottom line, and it is the one driver of profitability over which management has absolute control. It is one of a number of posts around price that are in the archives.

 

A marketer’s explanation of Net Present Value. February 2018

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-20v

Net Present Value, or NPV, is an accounting term thrown around with gay abandon by accountants, assuming everyone understands what it means. Over the years, very few marketers I have known had a clear understanding of NPV. Hopefully, this post helped some in those conversations with their accounting peers, trying to get their own back for all the jargon marketers habitually use, by using a bit of their own.

 

A private note to the chairman. April 2013

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-10x

This one was a surprise. It is an old post from 2013 that paraphrases a conversation I had with the chairman of an organisation on whose board I sat at the time. We had failed to agree for some time over a series of questions that could be characterised as the priority list against which the board should have been making resource allocation decisions for management to execute. At the time I was pretty fired up, and subsequently resigned the role. On rereading the post, I would not resile from any of the items listed, and would offer the same advice were I to be in a similar situation again.

 

How to wield Occam’s Razor to build robust strategy. June 2016.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Rd

Occam’s Razor seems to have become a bit fashionable recently which is perhaps why this post got a guernsey in the top ten, after languishing with the ‘also-rans’ for 5 years. The advice however is sound, seeking the simplest possible explanation that fits all the facts, no matter how unexpected it may be. In a complex and volatile world, simplicity is one the hardest things to achieve.

 

Classic Marketing Strategy: Before and After. September 2016.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Il

The title says it all. Marketing is about delivering a value proposition to those who may engage and make a purchase. Showing how the outcome of the purchase delivers a positive outcome has always been, and will always be a powerful way to communicate. I used myself as the example, having just had a couple of ‘headshots’ to replace the one I had been using, which was ‘homemade’. It might be time for an update, although the years and inactivity of Covid have not done me any favours.

 

Problem solving continuum. June 2010.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-k3

This post was a very early one, proposing the idea that every problem sits somewhere on a continuum that describes the way in which management goes about finding and executing a solution. At one end workarounds are common, to the other end where difficult problems are subjected to continuous improvement processes. There is much more that could be said, and a number of subsequent posts addressed some of these items, but given the interest, this idea will receive greater consideration in 2022.

 

The 7 mental models for Successful marketing. June 2017.

https://wp.me/p5fjXq-1Rw

This 10th inclusion reflects on a very personal experience that highlighted to me the simple fact that while the tools of marketing have changed radically over the last decade, the foundations have not changed at all. It is one of the longer posts in the archives, running to almost 3,000 words, and includes an audio version delivered at a small business seminar tagged on the end.

 

To those who have followed, commented, or just ‘dipped in’ occasionally, I extend my thanks, and hope that you continue to draw some value from my musings.

Have a great 2022, it can only be better than 2021.