12 common & avoidable marketing mistakes I see small businesses repeating.

12 common & avoidable marketing mistakes I see small businesses repeating.

How true is the old chestnut “those who do not know history are destined to repeat it”?

It is an unfortunate truth, but in a business environment where 75% of new businesses fail, and 61% of actively trading businesses have no employees, it may be understandable. The new ‘entrepreneurs’ come and go, many having no background in business for themselves, and little beyond an often significant functional skill that they think will lead customers to their door.

That strategy may have worked in the past, but no longer.

Being an employee is generally a lousy training to be an entrepreneur, of any type.

Following are a number of the most common causes of those failures I see, several on a disturbingly regular basis.

Funding ‘institutional’ advertising & promotion.

Most advertising I see is for an institution, or business, not for  the benefit of the customer and potential customer. The “buy from me, I am better” type advertising. Instead, advertisers should  think about every piece of communication as a piece of direct response advertising, something that requires and points to an action. Advertising should be just a media centric form of direct response, otherwise, why do it? Spending money on advertising without directing people to a course of action  is a waste.

Many will wail at that, and point to the need to build a brand. True. But it gets the order in which things happen back to front. You do  not build a brand just by advertising to attract customers/consumers, you build a brand by performing, delivering value to those who try you out, then come back again and again because the value is terrific, and in the process tell their friends. Advertising is just a tool to apply leverage to this process.

Not testing.

These days everything, or almost everything can be tested. Test so you can generate the maximum leverage for your activity. Any marketing activity costs a fixed amount of money, it is the maths of the responses that give you leverage. Spend $100 on an activity, and you get $150 back might seem OK, but if you got back $300, or $500, or $5,000 how much better would that be? The leverage you are generating from your activity is greater. Test for  the elements that will generate you the leverage, as adverting is just leverage applied in a different form.

Not having some sort of differentiator

Delivering value to your specific target audience that they cannot get elsewhere is essential.  Whatever is your key value, it has to be unique to somebody or you are just competing on price, and when you compete  on price, even if you win, you lose.

Not sufficiently recognising the value of their existing customers.

We all know at some level that is it easier to get more from an existing customer than it is to get a new one, but we still insist on going looking for new customers and to some degree ignoring the value still to be gained from the existing ones. Even if you bring them value for someone else that is complementary to what you can deliver, and perhaps clip the ticket, by bringing them that value you ensure you are  always on their radar, and they are receptive to any offer you make. This applies as much to heavy machinery and capital intensive industries as it does to the way Amazon flogs you more books by knowing what you have bought and looked at in the past, and comparing that to others that seem similar.

Insufficient customer research and understanding.

The clearer the understanding you have of your customers and  prospects needs, the  better able you are able to craft a compelling offer, negate objections, and solve their problems. Once you solve their problems they are yours forever, they will always have you on the short list, if  not be the only choice.

Do not have price as the only motivator to a sale. Winning the race to the bottom of the price curve, you also lose. When you use price as the motivator, as you might if you make a blue  and have a warehouse full of stock you need to flog, find some other way to add value. Provide a a guarantee, or assurance that this cut price is only available for a short time and then only to the most valued customers you have, there are many tried and true tactics . This puts a sense of urgency and exclusivity in the offer which obscures the discount as a motivator, so it does  not erode the full price that you need to be profitable when things return too normal.

Not making it easy to do business  with you.

We all know how annoying it is to be shunted from person to person, not  getting answers, we all hate it, so why do we do it to our customers?? Make it easy to do business with you. Often this requires that you give the decision making power to those at the front lines, those who have the first contact with the customer. Ensure they are sufficiently well trained and informed that they can answer all the questions that may be asked. How bloody annoying is it to ask a question, and be asked to wait while they go and get their supervisor! Make it easy, even fun to do  business with you, find ways to add that bit of extra value that others leave out, the little things make all  the difference.

Not being transparent and answering “Why‘.

‘Why does this cost more than the opposition?’… ‘Because it is hand made from rare materials, not some imitation, or it is twice as durable, so is really cheap at the price’.  Failing to communicate your ‘Why’ is a grave failure. If you have lots of inventory, and want to get rid of it quickly, as often happens in many forms of  retailing, tell them why, that this is a one time only limited to available stock offer, created  by your buying ability with your suppliers. Tell them why, is a very powerful tactic in selling.

Not being persistent 

When you have done the work, be prepared to stick with it, and not change tactics mid stream just because there is a bump in the road. Strategy is about the long term. When activities are consistent with the strategies and add to the long term, be prepared to hang in there, and not be seduced by the newest shiny thing that comes along and seems attractive, Most businesses get tired of their own marketing well before the market does, so stick. An old boss of mine used to say that consumers were just getting to see our advertising about the time we were getting sick of it, and that is so true. Stick with what works, vary the tone and tactics to keep it fresh and new as necessary, but stick to the strategy.

Lack of focus. Any sort of activity should be directed at a specific target, the more focused the better. When others see it and act on it, great, but the clearer the focus on a benefit to a target customer you have the better. This clearly requires that you have a very clear idea of the ‘where what how and why’ of your ideal customer, but without that you are just spraying messages and hoping they hit something that looks like a prospective customer, rather  when focusing on one and ensuring that you are adding value to them.

Not educating your customers.

Never sell to customers, educate them to the benefits they will see by the use of your solution to their problems and opportunities. By setting out to add value to your customers by educating them, you can earn the right to have them buy from you. The old fashioned hard sell rarely works any more.  Instead, educate, appeal to their emotions, and show them the benefits, as did Don Draper in this Man Men classic.

lack of understanding ‘lifetime customer value’.

In most markets, customers are customers more than once, so understanding the arithmetic supporting the value of your customer is crucial. If you spend 150% of the first sales value to acquire a customer who then stays on for a further couple of  sales that cost you little to get, you are way ahead. Never burn off a customer once you have them by failing to live up to expectations. Over-delivering to customers is always a great strategy, and maximises the lifetime value.

Ignoring the value of Social media.

Social media is deceptively hard to get right, and getting it wrong can be a disaster. However, every business should be leveraging the potential power of Social media, recognising the downside. The help of the 14 year old down the street can be useful, but it can also be hugely misleading, and potentially commercially dangerous.

There are many more, but these 12 are the most common marketing mistakes, but I cannot leave without adding another. Know your numbers. Failure to  understand the financial realities of a business brings more unstuck than all the rest put together.

How desperately does politics need a strategic makeover?

How desperately does politics need a strategic makeover?

The train smash that doubled as the recent Australian  federal election, and more tellingly, the ‘cluster-intercourse’ (politeness overcame me) that is the US presidential race have something in common.

They both lack any sort of the foundations for prosperity that we demand, indeed, regulate for, in our corporations.

In a corporation, when you do  not deliver the results, shareholders move their money elsewhere. Not so in Government.

In a corporation, when the leadership fails to deliver promised results they  get fired. Not so in Government, although some do carry the can for the rest, usually on a Last In First Out basis.

In a  corporation, if you tell a lie to shareholders, you can go to gaol. Not so in government.

In a corporation, when you do  not adequately articulate a realistic and achievable financial plan, bankers will not lend you money. Not so in Government.

In a corporation, when there is a noisy minority mouthing nonsense, you ignore them, or make polite fun of  them. Not so in Government, indeed, it seems that the noisy minority often successfully drives the agenda.

How have we allowed this to happen, after all it is supposed to be a democracy, although sometimes I wonder, as who in their right mind would vote for any of the above.

A year ago, the notion that an ego driven billionaire with no experience in government, little affinity to anything beyond his own interests, and little apparent relationship with the truth would be the US President was a laughable prospect. Now he is one of two in a race to the finish.

No laughing matter anymore is it?

How has this happened?

It seems to me that Trump has succeeded wildly where the Liberal party in Australia failed.

He has mastered the tools of immediacy marketing, social media platforms, particularly Twitter, and leveraged the fact that our journalistic capacity has been so  gutted, along with the attention span of the electorate, that the capacity for sensible and measured comment and debate has been removed. Have you noticed that everything anyone on the Democratic party side says gets a Trump response, often an outrageous one, on twitter within 5 minutes. The media picks it up, and in the absence of anyone on the newsrooms not playing Pokemon Go, reprints it in entirety as news. Then a few huff and puff for 24 hours and it is  forgotten or replaced by the next piece of shambolic inconsistent nonsense. By contrast, the Democrats take a day or so when they are awake to comment on the next of Mr Trumps blatherings, and are not nearly as colourful and entertaining when they do so.

And I have not even mentioned Britain’s new Foreign Minister Boris Johnson, whose mastery of the entertaining absurd rivals that of Mr Trump.

The simple fact is that you do not get headlines with measured, thoughtful analysis of the facts, together with projections that are never favourable to everyone, but you do get headlines with sensational brain-farts that disappear almost as fast as they are produced.

Headlines are now news, there seems to be no demand for substance in excess of 140 characters.

However, that current state is no excuse for not trying. Without the effort to reform from the grass roots the way we select our leaders, and demand from them some level of quality in the political and economic debate, on top of a reasonable degree of integrity and transparency, we are all in deep doo-doo, and it is getting progressively deeper the longer we allow this to keep happening.

Is technology killing advertising, and ruining our lives?

Is technology killing advertising, and ruining our lives?

A while ago I asked the question ‘Is the net killing marketing creativity‘ and came to the conclusion that the instant gratification now apparently demanded in all phases of our lives has indeed killed creativity.

Perhaps tritely I put it down to the not so bright amongst the marketing fraternity taking the easy way out, because it was the only one they could see.

However, the question does require some greater consideration.

That technology has overtaken us is indisputable, giving us the potential for focus and reach in addition to great  performance metrics, but creativity requires more than just speed. It requires subtlety, deep understanding of those with whom you are communicating, a capacity to see yourself through the eyes of others, and a willingness to be different and take risks.

It is in these latter areas that advertising is failing, badly.

For the uninitiated, ‘Martech’ seems to have caught on as the phrase of the moment, very intelligently pushed by my colleague Scott Brinker on the Chief Martech blog.

A subset of the Martech environment is the ‘Adtech’ tools, which have automated advertising, the most obvious but far from the only manifestation of creativity. Whether it  be on line or in an analogue environment, only the means of delivery has changed, not the need to engage, entice, intrigue and advise readers.

The ad industry has certainly been damaged, although great swathes of it have just got what they deserved, being mediocre purveyors of wasted investment, and unwilling to see the writing on the wall, although it was their wall.

The technology has been abused, and consumers have turned off it all, and the evidence for  that is everywhere.

Over 400 million people, 22% of smart phone owners use ad blockers to insulate themselves from advertising, and the number is currently higher on desk-top devices.

Web advertising has evolved quickly into the digital version of the crap that fills your letterbox, direct response, discount coupons, price promos, untargeted rubbish. Where is the recognition that advertising has a higher purpose, it is an investment in the long term, things called ‘brands’.

Remember them?

And as for advertisers, they are slowly waking up to the fact that up to 40% of their ads are being seen only by robots, and last I looked they do not buy much. In addition, the media placement is now often done by so called ‘programmatic buying’ which is a way of removing the insight and intuition of people from the process, saving money and pocketing the difference. While sellers tout the value of programmatic buying, and in some circumstances it does have merit, the major benefit is their pockets, not the advertisers marketing outcomes.

More fool the marketers I guess, they are getting what they deserve.

I will show my colors here, as little investigative reporting as we have come to know it being done in the digital space. Where would Australians be without people like Kate McClymont of Sydney’s SMH who almost single handedly, and against great odds provided the impetus that led to the conviction of Eddie Obeid for fraud, and exposed the predation of members of the Catholic church clergy in Newcastle that led to the current Royal Commission. Google and Facebook have no interest in this sort of journalism, paid for by advertising, and benefiting the society we live in.

As for consumers, we have had our privacy thrown against the digital wall. My kids seem less concerned than me, but nevertheless, I am bothered by the implications, as well as those bloody ads for stuff I do not want that follow me wherever I digitally go.

And as for the digital security of us all, when hackers find 138 holes in the pentagon web sites, good luck with the security of your google account.

How to build a sales process for your human salesforce.

How to build a sales process for your human salesforce.

These days great sales people, real ones, those that go and talk to customers and potential  customers are expensive, and hard to find.

Most often in a B2B environment their role is not just closing a sale but developing a relationship that is deeper and longer term than the individual  transaction. Success is measured not just by the transactions, but by the quality of the relationships they build, and the trust, that will take the pressure off price, delivery times, and the other quantitative measures used to judge performance from a distance.

It also true that the first time many sellers know a potential customer is in the market is after that customer has done a considerable amount of research, arrived at a short list, features required and price  point, which gives them the power in the conversation, unless you are able to re-frame it somehow.

The word ‘Process‘  in the headline implies repeatable, subject to continuous improvement, and measureable. In order to achieve these outcomes there are a number of building blocks:

Plan

The old cliché “failing to plan, is planning to fail’ is unfortunately true, that is why it is a cliché.  The caveat of course is that just planning will not generate an outcome, you actually have to implement. The gap between planning and implementation is deceptively wide and full of very hungry crocodiles  that will consume your will, time, and financial resources given the chance.

 

Don’t spend time, Invest it.

We demand a return  on our financial investments, why don’t we do the same for that most valuable of resources, our time? Most of us complete some sort of post capital expenditure review to check that the returns we expected and planned for prior to a capital investment actually materialised.

Why do we not do the same thing without most valuable resource, time?

This may be a challenging idea, but if you allocate your time to the ‘important but not urgent’ category rather than the seemingly urgent, but not important things that consume our lives, the returns will flow.

 

Learn continuously

Being able to learn is a gift, leverage it. Nobody becomes outstandingly good at something without learning from those who have gone before and mastered  the skills. Beyond a base level of skill, you need coaching to learn,  and it is the primary role of a sales manager to coach those in their team, so they learn, do better, effectively leveraging their time and expertise, learnt from those who went before, and their hard won experience.  A core part of learning is being able to be reflective about what worked and what did not, then making those small adjustments, day after day, to test and improve.

 

Be proactive

An old football coach of mine used to bang it into our heads that while defence was a critically important component of any contest, you did not win by preventing the other bloke from scoring, at best, it was a draw.

Being proactive is about experimenting, taking considered risks, searching for opportunities, prospecting for ideas and applications that others have missed, being unafraid of the power of the status quo, and being prepared to ask for forgiveness rather than waiting for permission.

My standard mantra is ‘get out of the building’ meaning nothing different or innovative happens within the context of your normal, routine activities.

 

Follow up obsessively

Few sales are made at the first contact, or second. It takes time and polite persistence mixed with an understanding of why the ‘target’ will benefit from buying from you. Failing to articulate the value of your proposition results in the follow up being Spam, but if the value is genuinely there, follow up builds credibility, and in a small way, a sense of reciprocity or obligation to at least give you the opportunity to make your pitch.

 

Remove ‘busywork’

We all know that work fills the time available, but we also know  that often the stuff being done is just ‘busywork’, stuff that rally makes little difference apart from reassuring yourself that you are needed, and others that you are indispensable. Remove it, ruthlessly, in favour of activity that customers would be prepared to pay for, because that is exactly what they are doing, indirectly.

 

Most of the real work is not digital

It has becomes to easy to rely in digital to do our jobs for us. It won’t, it can only do exactly as it is told. Besides, people buy from those they know like and trust, and I never met a computer I completely trusted, somehow they are not completely human.

 

As noted previously, the term ‘Sales’ is to my mind approaching redundant, as it conjured up in most people minds something less than what it is, or should be. The term I favour is Revenue Generation. This simple semantic change tends to shake perceptions and put the sales function into the spotlight as being vital, not just those people down the hall with company cars who go out to lunch a lot.

Social media, Wholesalers of eyeballs.

Social media, Wholesalers of eyeballs.

The business models  of all major social media platforms require a profit, and they generate that by being wholesalers of eyeballs.

They do not do it for free, any more than your wholesalers of produce at the city markets provides their service for free.

Social media platforms fight for the attention of users, then sell the users attention to advertisers, attracted by the ability to slice and dice the audience in ways almost  unimaginable a decade ago.

However, at the foundation level, little has changed since the dark ages of print media, just a decade ago, when profitability depended on content being sufficiently attractive for buyers to purchase a newspaper or magazine, offering the opportunity to advertisers to show them their advertisements. The only difference is that the media is now run by algorithms and often crowdsourced content, rather than journalists and typesetters.

The objective is unchanged, creating the situation where advertisers are willing to pay for eyeballs.

The fight for this wholesale market share also has not changed much. Newspapers over the years consolidated and generated profits by a combination of scale delivering low cost, and regional eyeball oligopolies, often monopolies.

Now the digital platforms are playing the same game.

Facebook has once again tightened the screws on brand marketers by reducing the eyeballs that will go to their pages. They talk about enhancing the experience for their customers, i.e. those who use Facebook, not the advertisers who are trying to reach users. Controlling access to the newsfeed is a way of controlling supply, and every economics 101 student knows that the intersection of the supply and demand  curves is the price. Build demand, restrict supply, Goldmine.

Microsoft’s purchase of Linkedin for $US 26 billion last month (June 2016), an eye-watering amount, is a similar play for eyeballs, and seems great value when compared to Facebooks purchase of WhatsApp which was still just a startup, for $US19 billion in early 2014. Microsoft had a big hole in their grip on their business customers, now filled by Linkedin. So it seems that even more than ever, Facebook will be the social platform for socialising, and  Linkedin, which includes the Slideshare platform purchased for what now seems a paltry $US119 million back in May 2012, the social platform for business. Given Microsofts power elsewhere in the digital ecosystem, with the ageing cash cow ‘Office’ platform, their enterprise offerings, and Xbox for consumers, it is a logical hole in their range of eyeballs.

All of this leads to the simple conclusion that the marketing priority of businesses should be the building of their own eyeball platform,  their website and own ecosystem that leverages the wholesalers to your benefit, not just theirs. In your own home you can do pretty much what you wish, instead of being at the mercy of the landlord as you are when you rent.