Jul 7, 2023 | Branding, Marketing, Sales
A hundred years of practical experience and academic research proves that cutting marketing budgets during tough times is the worst thing you can do. Most do it, simply because it is easy, seems sensible to the uninitiated, and often prevents yelling from the corner office.
This provides great opportunity for those who hold their nerve.
Brands are built by having a ‘share of voice‘ greater than their market share over time. Brand building is a long-term exercise, which becomes cheaper in a recession, as others cut their expenditure, demand for advertising space drops, so does the price as a result, and your customer is more likely to see your ads in a less cluttered environment.
This is a strategic investment.
You should reduce the existing tactical, promotional deals if you can, as they are costs to the bottom line, not investments in your brand. You might get a short-term volume bump, but the added volume rarely replaces the margin lost from the discount.
Do the maths before you agree to the discount.
How much extra volume do you need from the promotion to recover the margin surrendered? Consider also the customers perception of the ‘right price’ for your product. Have you just lowered it?
You can cut yourself to oblivion, easily, while being clapped from the sidelines. Usually those clapping control access to consumers, as do supermarkets, or are those customers who would have been happy to pay more.
Do not miss the opportunity to build your brand while your competitors are hunkered down giving discounts in an effort to maintain volume, while destroying long term commercial sustainability.
Header credit Tom Fishburne at marketoonist, who very effectively pokes fun at marketing hubris.
Jun 19, 2023 | Customers, Sales
Optimising a sales process is not just about the conversion rate, as that is an outcome, a function of many things that come before and contribute to that outcome. The challenge is more about optimising each stage in the process that leads to a maximised conversion rate.
Over the years there have been many tools that assist the process, BANT being one of the best known. All of them in one way or another recognise a progression through a process that should be simple, but which consultants and others have overcomplicated.
The following 3 part qualification process should play a role.
Basic criteria for qualification.
Does the prospect fit the picture of your ideal customer?
Basic criteria + Fit.
Does the prospect have a need for what you have, do they have a problem you can solve better than anyone else? How compelling to them is your value proposition?
Basic criteria + Fit + Intent.
Is the prospect aware of the problem, are they searching for a solution, have they engaged with you in some way? Are they willing and able to pay for your solution? What elements will drive the timing of their decision to buy now, delay, or decide not to buy?
While this may seem too simple, often the best is also the simplest.
May 11, 2023 | Leadership, Small business
SME’s suffer in many ways from the lack of scale when competing against much larger enterprises. However, if you look hard enough, there are always benefits to be found that may outweigh the costs.
- Small budgets mean reliance on qualitative rather than quantitative research and market intelligence, which require deeper pockets. Go out and talk to a few customers, ex customers, and non-customers in your market, you will learn more in a couple of afternoons than the spreadsheet jockeys in the larger companies will learn in a year.
- Make niche choices early. Rather than scanning the horizons for opportunities, pick a niche and own it. Chances are it will be something that the larger companies have overlooked, or is too small for them to allocate resources, but for an SME, they can be a great stepping-stone to profitability and growth.
- Revel in being the underdog. Avis Vs Hertz.: ‘We try harder’ the line Hertz used is the standard bearer for this battle of the underdog. We humans love to support the underdog against the impersonal giants.
- Be very price sensitive. Pricing high is always a good strategy, as it is easier to come down than to go up, and avoid predictable and regular discounting like the plague. Your larger competitor is unlikely to be as sensitive to the difficult task of optimising price as you are, working off price lists that are updated in total, from time to time.
- Pareto the pareto. Focus, focus. Bring all your resource’s to bear on a point of value you can deliver, don’t dissipate them by being all things to all people. This applies to customers, service offerings, communications, everything, focus on the points that will deliver the most bang for the buck. Be the king of ‘No’. Warren Buffet noted that the one common feature of successful people is that they say no a lot. The larger your competitor is, the easier it is for them to be distracted, and gummed up by bureaucracy.
- This point will seem inconsistent with the point above, but watch for anomalies. While focus is essential the risk is that you are so focused that you do not see things that will make an impact when they are just small points on the horizon. These small anomalies are the things that generate change. Large businesses tend to ignore them, or they get lost in the bureaucracy, SME’s have the opportunity to move quickly and decisively.
- Balance the tactical and strategic. Small businesses tend to be seduced by the tactical stuff. Short term this is OK but not a good long-term recipe. Both are necessary, but you must resist the temptation to worry about the future when it comes, as it is already here in some form, so you have to build for it before it gets to you. Be specific about the breakup you deploy, knowing the big blokes are stuck deploying changes in either.
- Be flexible and agile. They are different, flexibility enables you to move with the changes in the market, agility is more short term, enabling you to make choices that are outside the ‘brand architecture’ as they emerge. Pivot in the jargon, your larger competitors will find it hard to get out of their own way.
What have I missed?
Jan 5, 2023 | Customers, Management, Sales
In almost every situation I have ever seen, ‘Sales’ includes all sales, and salespeople are often rewarded via commissions on the total of all those sales.
In many categories of B2B sales, the only time a person does a ‘Sales’ job is to gain that first transaction, after which it is all about retention, a different set of skills.
Assuming the first transaction goes well, the product was delivered on time, in specification, and did the job promised, the chances of a repeat at the appropriate interval is higher, and may not require the ‘sales’ skills of the original salesperson. Rather, it requires the interaction of operational and logistics personnel to manage the relationship, and the transactions that occur within that relationship.
If that is the case, why do we habitually reward salespeople on the total of all sales?
Salespeople are as different as any other group of people. The archetypal ‘Always be Closing’ salesman of the past has now almost disappeared, replaced by a range of people covering differing tasks. This reflects the changed role of sales with the move of information from the hands of the seller to those of the buyer.
Almost every salesperson also sees customers as ‘their’ customers.
Again, if the hypothesis is that they are only necessary for the first transaction holds, this is a mistake.
The logistics and operations people should hold the relationship, assisted by an internal ‘customer service’ person, while the salesperson goes off ‘hunting’ for the next new customer, or indeed, sales in an adjacent product or market area of a current customer not currently serviced. This would be a far better use of the time available to a salesperson than running around at the factory trying to wrangle a preferred spot in the production schedule.
A business I ran as a contractor some years ago had a specialist sales force made up of highly trained technologists. When tracking their activity, it became obvious that most of their time was consumed by tasks other than ‘sales’. These involved interaction with the customers technologists, their operational, marketing and planning personnel. Significant time was also spent at their desks dealing with the complexity of our planning and operational processes in order to meet sometimes impossible delivery promises made under pressure from customers.
This blurred the line between the tasks best undertaken by a specialist technical salesperson, dealing directly with generating more sales, and the tasks that were better done by internal customer service people. The ambiguity of responsibility for specific tasks, and our very malleable processes was hamstringing the productivity of the investment in sales.
The communication tools we have today really mean that we are now able to direct the activities of sales personnel towards where their value lies, identifying and solving customer problems. They do not have to be in the office apart from training and progress sessions. The logistics of providing the products are best managed by those who are hands on in the factory, warehouse and admin functions.
After some changes, sales went up significantly, as did the margins, as the salespeople had more time to spend identifying and solving difficult challenges that naturally brought higher margins.
As you consider the structures necessary for success as the new year opens, you might give some thought to the priorities set for the salespeople, and their support functions in your business.
Header credit: Scott Adams via Dilbert
Oct 28, 2022 | Customers, Marketing
The J. Walter Thompson advertising agency is one of the prototypes for the ‘Madmen’ of advertising, the architype of the explosion of consumer advertising that occurred in the sixties.
The agency was started by James Walter Thompson in 1896, when the ‘advertising’ function was nothing more than a brokerage service for selling space in newspapers.
Advertising in those days, well before even radio and consumer magazines, had only newspapers as their communication medium. It slowly expanded into creating the ‘advertising product’ to make selling the space easier into the expanding range of communication options, all on commission.
Simple days.
Most success relies on simple things, breaking down the complex so they are easily understood. So it was with advertising in those early days, before we were blasted by ever increasingly complex offers and intrusive psychological hooks to sell us more stuff.
It is often useful to go back to these roots, to see what made for success early, what were the simple things that worked.
The ‘Thompson T-Square’ is one such tool in copywriting.
Every successful copywriter used it, a few simple questions to focus the mind on what was really important as they wrote the copy. At J. Walter Thompson, it was pinned to the wall of every copywriters office.
What are we selling?
To whom are we selling it?
Where are we selling it?
When are we selling it?
How are we selling it?
Simplistic yes, but also effective, and leading to the ‘four P’s’ of marketing, articulated by E. Jerome McCarthy in 1960.
Those simple questions lead to the consideration of the most effective articulation of value to the ideal customer, who would be receiving the messages in a manner that made them comfortable, and receptive to the idea of a purchase.
So, the simple answer to the question in the header is ‘Yes, every day”, it still works!
The header is an 1868 portrait of James Walter Thompson, courtesy of Wikipedia.
